Facultative pupal mating in Heliconius erato: Implications for mate choice, female preference, and speciation

被引:14
|
作者
Thurman, Timothy J. [1 ,2 ]
Brodie, Emily [1 ,4 ]
Evans, Elizabeth [1 ,3 ]
McMillan, William Owen [1 ]
机构
[1] Smithsonian Trop Res Inst, Panama City, Panama
[2] McGill Univ, Dept Biol & Redpath Museum, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] Univ Puerto Rico, Dept Biol, San Juan, PR 00936 USA
[4] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Environm Sci & Policy, One Shields Ave, Davis, CA 95616 USA
来源
ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION | 2018年 / 8卷 / 03期
关键词
Heliconius; mate choice; mating system; pupal mating; sexual conflict; SEXUAL SELECTION; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; BUTTERFLIES; LEPIDOPTERA; ATTRACTION; PATTERN; PLANTS; NYMPHALIDAE; EVOLUTION; CONFLICT;
D O I
10.1002/ece3.3624
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Mating systems have broad impacts on how sexual selection and mate choice operate within a species, but studies of mating behavior in the laboratory may not reflect how these processes occur in the wild. Here, we examined the mating behavior of the neotropical butterfly Heliconius erato in the field by releasing larvae and virgin females and observing how they mated. H.erato is considered a pupal-mating species (i.e., males mate with females as they emerge from the pupal case). However, we observed only two teneral mating events, and experimentally released virgins were almost all mated upon recapture. Our study confirms the presence of some pupal-mating behavior in H.erato, but suggests that adult mating is likely the prevalent mating strategy in this species. These findings have important implications for the role of color pattern and female mate choice in the generation of reproductive isolation in this diverse genus.
引用
收藏
页码:1882 / 1889
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Female mate choice is a reproductive isolating barrier in Heliconius butterflies
    Southcott, Laura
    Kronforst, Marcus R.
    ETHOLOGY, 2018, 124 (12) : 862 - 869
  • [2] Evaluating female remating rates in light of spermatophore degradation in Heliconius butterflies: pupal-mating monandry versus adult-mating polyandry
    Walters, James R.
    Corbin, Chris
    Hardcastle, Thomas J.
    Jiggins, Chris D.
    ECOLOGICAL ENTOMOLOGY, 2012, 37 (04) : 257 - 268
  • [3] An experimental test to separate the effects of male age and mating history on female mate choice
    Aich, Upama
    Bonnet, Timothee
    Fox, Rebecca J.
    Jennions, Michael D.
    Candolin, Ulrika
    BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY, 2020, 31 (06) : 1353 - 1360
  • [4] Male Mating History Influences Female Mate Choice in the Trinidadian Guppy (Poecilia reticulata)
    Scarponi, Valentina
    Chowdhury, Deepro
    Godin, Jean-Guy J.
    ETHOLOGY, 2015, 121 (11) : 1091 - 1103
  • [5] Female mating status affects mating and male mate-choice in the copepod genus Acartia
    Burris, Z. P.
    Dam, H. G.
    JOURNAL OF PLANKTON RESEARCH, 2015, 37 (01) : 183 - 196
  • [6] Female receptivity affects subsequent mating effort and mate choice in male guppies
    Guevara-Fiore, P.
    Endler, J. A.
    ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2018, 140 : 73 - 79
  • [7] Female mate choice in convict cichlids is transitive and consistent with a self-referent directional preference
    Dechaume-Moncharmont, Francois-Xavier
    Freychet, Marine
    Motreuil, Sebastien
    Cezilly, Frank
    FRONTIERS IN ZOOLOGY, 2013, 10
  • [8] Frequencies of alternative mating strategies influence female mate preference in the swordtail Xiphophorus multilineatus
    Tudor, M. Scarlett
    Morris, Molly R.
    ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2011, 82 (06) : 1313 - 1318
  • [9] Female preference and fitness benefits of mate choice in a species with dissociated sperm transfer
    Zizzari, Z. Valentina
    Braakhuis, Annika
    van Straalen, Nico M.
    Ellers, Jacintha
    ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2009, 78 (05) : 1261 - 1267
  • [10] Mate Choice versus Mate Preference: Inferences about Color-Assortative Mating Differ between Field and Lab Assays of Poison Frog Behavior
    Yang, Yusan
    Blomenkamp, Simone
    Dugas, Matthew B.
    Richards-Zawacki, Corinne L.
    Proehl, Heike
    AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2019, 193 (04) : 598 - 607