Axial vs. equatorial dipolar dynamo models with implications for planetary magnetic fields

被引:47
作者
Aubert, J [1 ]
Wicht, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Aeron, D-37191 Katlenburg Lindau, Germany
关键词
numerical dynamo simulation; axial dipole; equatorial dipole; Uranus; Neptune; magnetic field;
D O I
10.1016/S0012-821X(04)00102-5
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
We present several numerical simulations of a self-consistent dynamo model in a rotating spherical shell. The solutions have two different field configurations. Besides magnetic fields dominated by the axial dipole component, we also find configurations where a dipole in the equatorial plane is the dominating component. Both types are stable in a parameter regime of intermediate shell thickness and Rayleigh numbers close to onset of convection. Axial dipole solutions are subcritical in all the simulations explored while the equatorial dipole cases are supercritical at low Rayleigh numbers but become metastable at higher Rayleigh numbers. The magnetic field strength saturates at a much lower amplitude for the equatorial dipole dynamos, and the Elsasser number is significantly smaller than in the axial configuration. The reason is that the mainly horizontal field in the equatorial dipole solution is incompatible with the motion of convective cyclones and anticyclones. The axial dipole field, on the other hand, is predominantly aligned with the axis of anticyclones, only cyclones are disrupted by horizontal field lines passing through. This configuration can therefore accomodate stronger convective flows and, consequently, is the only one remaining stable at higher Rayleigh numbers. These arguments should pertain in all planetary dynamos that are governed by strong rotational constraints. They offer an explanation why the Elsasser numbers inferred for Uranus and Neptune are much lower than. the Elsasser numbers of Jupiter, Saturn, and Earth. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V: All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:409 / 419
页数:11
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   Quasigeostrophic models of convection in rotating spherical shells [J].
Aubert, J ;
Gillet, N ;
Cardin, P .
GEOCHEMISTRY GEOPHYSICS GEOSYSTEMS, 2003, 4
[2]   Superionic and metallic states of water and ammonia at giant planet conditions [J].
Cavazzoni, C ;
Chiarotti, GL ;
Scandolo, S ;
Tosatti, E ;
Bernasconi, M ;
Parrinello, M .
SCIENCE, 1999, 283 (5398) :44-46
[3]   A 3-DIMENSIONAL SELF-CONSISTENT COMPUTER-SIMULATION OF A GEOMAGNETIC-FIELD REVERSAL [J].
GLATZMAIER, GA ;
ROBERTS, PH .
NATURE, 1995, 377 (6546) :203-209
[4]   Convection-driven quadrupolar dynamos in rotating spherical shells [J].
Grote, E ;
Busse, FH ;
Tilgner, A .
PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 1999, 60 (05) :R5025-R5028
[5]   Kinematic dynamo action in a sphere - II. Symmetry selection [J].
Gubbins, D ;
Barber, CN ;
Gibbons, S ;
Love, JJ .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 2000, 456 (1999) :1669-1683
[6]   The magnetic fields of Uranus and Neptune: Methods and models [J].
Holme, R ;
Bloxham, J .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-PLANETS, 1996, 101 (E1) :2177-2200
[7]   Equatorial magnetic dipole field intensification by convection vortices in a rotating spherical shell [J].
Ishihara, N ;
Kida, S .
FLUID DYNAMICS RESEARCH, 2002, 31 (04) :253-274
[8]   Velocity and magnetic field structures in a magnetohydrodynamic dynamo [J].
Kageyama, A ;
Sato, T .
PHYSICS OF PLASMAS, 1997, 4 (05) :1569-1575
[9]   An earth-like numerical dynamo model [J].
Kuang, WL ;
Bloxham, J .
NATURE, 1997, 389 (6649) :371-374
[10]   From stable dipolar towards reversing numerical dynamos [J].
Kutzner, C ;
Christensen, UR .
PHYSICS OF THE EARTH AND PLANETARY INTERIORS, 2002, 131 (01) :29-45