Is the Affinity Column-Mediated Immunoassay Method Suitable as an Alternative to the Microparticle Enzyme Immunoassay Method as a Blood Tacrolimus Assay?

被引:19
作者
Ju, M. K. [1 ,2 ]
Chang, H. K. [1 ,2 ]
Kim, H. J. [2 ]
Huh, K. H. [2 ]
Ahn, H. J. [2 ]
Kim, M. S. [1 ,2 ]
Kim, S. I. [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Y. S. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Dept Surg, Seoul 120752, South Korea
[2] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Res Inst Transplantat, Seoul 120752, South Korea
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.transproceed.2008.04.019
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background. Tacrolimus is a potent immunosuppressive drug used in organ transplantation. Because of its substantial toxic effects, narrow therapeutic index, and interindividual pharmacokinetic variability, therapeutic drug monitoring of whole-blood tacrolimus concentrations has been recommended. We investigated the comparability of the results of 2 immunoassay systems, affinity column-mediated immunoassay (ACMIA) and microparticle enzyme immunoassay (MEIA), comparing differences in the tacrolimus concentrations measured by the 2 methods in relation to the hematologic and biochemical values of hepatic and renal functions. Methods. A total of 154 samples from kidney or liver transplant recipients were subjected to Dimension RxL HM with a tacrolimus Flex reagent cartilage for the ACMIA method and IMx tacrolimus 11 for the META method. Results. Tacrolimus concentrations measured by the ACMIA method (n = 154) closely correlated with those measured by the META method (r = 0.84). The Bland-Altman plot using concentration differences between the 2 methods and the average of the 2 methods showed no specific trends. The tacrolimus levels determined by both the META method and the ACMIA method were not influenced by hematocrit levels, but the difference between the 2 methods (ACMIA - META) tended to be larger in low hematocrit samples (P < .001). Conclusion, The ACMIA method used for a tacrolimus assay is precise and has advantages, including the lack of a required pretreatment procedure. Furthermore, it is only slightly influenced by the hematologic or biochemical status of the samples.
引用
收藏
页码:3673 / 3678
页数:6
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
Armstrong VW, 1998, CLIN CHEM, V44, P2516
[2]  
Chow FS, 1997, DRUG METAB DISPOS, V25, P610
[3]  
Cogill JL, 1998, CLIN CHEM, V44, P1942
[4]   CYCLOSPORINE CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS [J].
FAHR, A .
CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS, 1993, 24 (06) :472-495
[5]   Performance of a no-pretreatment tacrolimus assay on the Dade Behring Dimension RxL clinical chemistry analyzer [J].
Griffey, Megan A. ;
Hock, Karl G. ;
Kilgore, Daniel C. ;
Wei, Tie Q. ;
Duh, Show-Hong ;
Christenson, Robert ;
Scott, Mitchell G. .
CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2007, 384 (1-2) :48-51
[6]   False positive blood tacrolimus concentration in microparticle enzyme immunoassay [J].
Homma, M ;
Tomita, T ;
Yuzawa, K ;
Takada, Y ;
Kohda, Y .
BIOLOGICAL & PHARMACEUTICAL BULLETIN, 2002, 25 (08) :1119-1120
[7]   Interference of hematocrit in the tacrolimus II microparticle enzyme immunoassay [J].
Kuzuya, T ;
Ogura, Y ;
Motegi, Y ;
Moriyama, N ;
Nabeshima, T .
THERAPEUTIC DRUG MONITORING, 2002, 24 (04) :507-511
[8]   DISTRIBUTION AND PROTEIN-BINDING OF FK506, A POTENT IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE MACROLIDE LACTONE, IN HUMAN BLOOD AND ITS UPTAKE BY ERYTHROCYTES [J].
NAGASE, K ;
IWASAKI, K ;
NOZAKI, K ;
NODA, K .
JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 1994, 46 (02) :113-117
[9]  
NIGEL WB, 2005, CLIN CHEM, V51, P586
[10]  
OCONNOR M, 0606 TACR