Empirical seismic fragility assessment with explicit modeling of spatial ground motion variability

被引:31
作者
Yazgan, Ufuk [1 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Tech Univ, Earthquake Engn & Disaster Management Inst, TR-34469 Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
Fragility assessment; Ground motion variability; Seismic fragility; Vulnerability; Empirical fragility; Seismic loss estimation; Bayesian analysis; Ground motion uncertainty; Seismic risk assessment; Reinforced concrete buildings; PROBABILISTIC EVALUATION; RESIDUAL DISPLACEMENTS; SIMULATING MAXIMUM; RISK-ASSESSMENT; EARTHQUAKE; FRAMES; SITE;
D O I
10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.06.027
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The earthquake risk to a group of structures can be managed effectively only if accurate fragility models are available. Fragility models are utilized for estimating the likelihood of specific damage states being sustained by the structures given that they are subjected to a specific ground motion intensity. In this study, a new framework is proposed for establishing empirical fragility models for groups of structures based on observed damage distribution. The novelty of the proposed framework method is that it explicitly takes into account the uncertainty arising from the absence of instrumental recordings of the peak motion intensities that had affected the considered structures. Correlation structure of the unknown peak motion intensities experienced by the affected structures and the known peak motions measured at the strong motion stations sites are utilized for this purpose. This correlation structure is established using geospatial ground motion variability models. As an example of the application of the proposed framework, fragility models for multi-story reinforced concrete moment resisting frame buildings are presented. In this application, the damage observations made after the November 17th, 1999 M7.1 Duzce and the May 1st, 2003 M6.4 Bingol earthquakes that occurred in-Turkey are considered. The results from the example application demonstrate the effectiveness of the method in establishing fragility models. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:479 / 489
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Seismic Fragility Curve Assessment Based on Synthetic Ground Motions with Conditional Spectra [J].
Trevlopoulos, Konstantinos ;
Zentner, Irmela .
PURE AND APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2020, 177 (05) :2375-2390
[22]   Fragility-based seismic assessment of traditional masonry buildings on Azores (Portugal) using simulated ground-motion records [J].
Bernardo, Vasco ;
Karimzadeh, Shaghayegh ;
Caicedo, Daniel ;
Hussaini, Sayed Mohammad Sajad ;
Lourenco, Paulo B. .
EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2024, 40 (04) :2836-2861
[23]   An Unbiased Estimation of Empirical Lognormal Fragility Functions with Uncertainties on the Ground Motion Intensity Measure [J].
Ader, Thomas ;
Grant, Damian N. ;
Free, Matthew ;
Villani, Manuela ;
Lopez, Jorge ;
Spence, Robin .
JOURNAL OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2020, 24 (07) :1115-1133
[24]   Fusing physics-based and machine learning models for rapid ground-motion-adaptative probabilistic seismic fragility assessment [J].
Xiong, Qingsong ;
Kong, Qingzhao ;
Yuan, Cheng ;
Li, Ying ;
Ji, Keyan ;
Xiong, Haibei .
JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2024, 87
[25]   Fuzzy seismic fragility analysis of gravity dams considering spatial variability of material parameters [J].
Li, Zefa ;
Wu, Zhenyu ;
Chen, Jiankang ;
Pei, Liang ;
Lu, Xiang .
SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2021, 140
[26]   Empirical fragility assessment using conditional GMPE-based ground shaking fields: application to damage data for 2016 Amatrice Earthquake [J].
Miano, A. ;
Jalayer, F. ;
Forte, G. ;
Santo, A. .
BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2020, 18 (15) :6629-6659
[27]   Seismic fragility analysis of a coupled tank-piping system based on artificial ground motions and surrogate modeling [J].
Abbiati, G. ;
Broccardo, M. ;
di Filippo, R. ;
Stojadinovic, B. ;
Bursi, O. S. .
JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2021, 72
[28]   Seismic Rehabilitation Optimization of Water Pipe Networks Considering Spatial Variabilities of Demand Criticalities and Seismic Ground Motion Intensities [J].
Pudasaini, Binaya ;
Shahandashti, Mohsen .
JOURNAL OF INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS, 2021, 27 (04)
[29]   Mainshock-Aftershock Ground Motion Sequences Selection and its Implication on Bridge Seismic Fragility [J].
Kumar, Vikram ;
Singh, Vivek ;
Shekhar, Shivang .
JOURNAL OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2025, 29 (04) :957-980
[30]   Numerical Modeling of Near Fault Seismic Ground Motion for Denali Fault [J].
Rajaram, Chenna ;
Kumar, Ramancharla Pradeep .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2021, 12 (02) :62-82