Correction of Class II malocclusion with Class II elastics: A systematic review

被引:121
作者
Janson, Guilherme [1 ]
Sathler, Renata [1 ]
Freire Fernandes, Thais Maria [1 ]
Castello Branco, Nuria Cabral [1 ]
de Freitas, Marcos Roberto [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Orthodont, Bauru Dent Sch, BR-17012901 Bauru, SP, Brazil
关键词
FIXED FUNCTIONAL APPLIANCES; ORTHOPEDIC FORCES; DIVISION; NONEXTRACTION; EXTRACTION; ANCHORAGE; EDGEWISE; OCCLUSAL; COMPONENTS; SEVERITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.10.015
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Introduction: Although Class II elastics have been widely used in the correction of Class II malocclusions, there is still a belief that their side effects override the intended objectives. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the true effects of Class II elastics in Class II malocclusion treatment. Methods: A search was performed on PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, Medline, and Cochrane databases, complemented by a hand search. Study eligibility criteria were the application of Class II elastics in Class II malocclusion treatment and the presentation of dental or skeletal outcomes of treatment. All age groups were included. Results: The search indentified 417 articles, of which 11 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Four studied the isolated effects of Class II elastics, and 7 were comparisons between a single use of elastics and another method for Class II malocclusion correction. Because of the differences in treatment modalities in these articles, a meta-analysis was not possible. Conclusions: Based on the current literature, we can state that Class II elastics are effective in correcting Class II malocclusions, and their effects are primarily dentoalveolar. Therefore, they are similar to the effects of fixed functional appliances in the long term, placing these 2 methods close to each other when evaluating treatment effectiveness. Little attention has been given to the effects of Class II elastics on the soft tissues in Class II malocclusion treatment. (Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013;143:383-92)
引用
收藏
页码:383 / 392
页数:10
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
Baccetti T, 2009, AM J ORTHOD DENTOFAC, V135
[2]   Effect of timing on the outcomes of 1-phase nonextraction therapy of Class II malocclusion [J].
Baccetti, Tiziano ;
Franchi, Lorenzo ;
Kim, Ludia H. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2009, 136 (04) :501-509
[3]  
Baccetti T, 2009, AM J ORTHOD DENTOFAC, V135, P698, DOI 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.02.014
[5]   Treatment and posttreatment changes in patients with Class II, Division 1 malocclusion after extraction and nonextraction treatment [J].
Bishara, SE ;
Ortho, D ;
Cummins, DM ;
Zaher, AR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1997, 111 (01) :18-27
[6]  
Buchner HJ, 1949, ANGLE ORTHOD, V19, P231
[7]  
Combrink F J, 2006, SADJ, V61, P344
[8]   CHANGES IN MANDIBULAR LENGTH BEFORE, DURING, AND AFTER SUCCESSFUL ORTHOPEDIC CORRECTION OF CLASS-II MALOCCLUSIONS, USING A FUNCTIONAL APPLIANCE [J].
DEVINCENZO, JP .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1991, 99 (03) :241-257
[9]  
DROSCHL H, 1975, ANGLE ORTHOD, V45, P26
[10]   A comparative study of anchorage in bioprogressive versus standard edgewise treatment in Class II correction with intermaxillary elastic force [J].
Ellen, EK ;
Schneider, BJ ;
Sellke, T .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1998, 114 (04) :430-436