Intranasal spray medications for maintenance therapy of allergic rhinitis

被引:24
作者
Berger, William E. [1 ,2 ]
Meltzer, Eli O. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Irvine, Sch Med, Div Basic & Clin Immunol, Mission Viejo, CA 92691 USA
[2] Allergy & Asthma Associates, Mission Viejo, CA 92691 USA
[3] Univ Calif San Diego, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Div Immunol & Allergy, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
[4] Allergy & Asthma Med Grp & Res Ctr, San Diego, CA USA
关键词
DIPROPIONATE NASAL AEROSOL; PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL; ONCE-DAILY TREATMENT; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; MOMETASONE FUROATE; DOUBLE-BLIND; AZELASTINE HYDROCHLORIDE; FLUTICASONE PROPIONATE; ECONOMIC-IMPACT; UNITED-STATES;
D O I
10.2500/ajra.2015.29.4215
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Background: Intranasal sprays are recommended as targeted therapy for allergic rhinitis (AR) by providing direct delivery of medication to the nasal mucosa, reducing the potential for systemic adverse effects, decreasing burden of disease, and improving quality of life. Objective: To review currently available intranasal sprays indicated for maintenance therapy of AR in the United States: intranasal antihistamines (INAH); intranasal corticosteroids (INCS); and MP-AzeFlu, a single formulation nasal spray of the INAH, azelastine hydrochloride, and the INCS, fluticasone propionate. Methods: MEDLINE searches were conducted to identify placebo-controlled studies of commercially available prescription nasal sprays at U.S.-approved doses and indications, and published after an earlier systematic review of AR treatment. Inclusion criteria were >= 20 subjects; duration of >= 2 weeks for seasonal (or episodic) AR, >= 4 weeks for perennial (or persistent) AR, and reporting a total nasal symptom score as a primary or secondary outcome. Results: Twenty studies met the inclusion criteria: 4 pediatric, 16 adult/adolescent. There were 4 perennial AR studies (381 children, 1607 adults) and 16 seasonal AR trials (3081 children, 6548 adults). In these studies, 2451 subjects (481 children, 1970 adults) received an INCS, 3001 (1116 children, 1885 adults) received an INAH, and 346 adult subjects received MP-AzeFlu. All active treatments were well tolerated and effective as measured by the reduction in nasal symptoms. Head-to-head comparisons were only available for MP-AzeFlu versus the individual active agent components. MP-AzeFlu provided significantly greater symptom relief than either azelastine or fluticasone propionate alone and with an onset starting at 30 minutes after the dose. Conclusion: The most recent addition to intranasal sprays for the maintenance therapy of AR is MP-AzeFlu, a single formulation nasal spray of azelastine hydrochloride and fluticasone propionate in an advanced delivery system. Analysis of clinical data showed this to be the first new intranasal medication that provides greater clinical benefit than an INCS in treating AR.
引用
收藏
页码:273 / 282
页数:10
相关论文
共 58 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2007, VITAL HLTH STAT
  • [2] Efficacy and long-term safety of mometasone furoate nasal spray in children with perennial allergic rhinitis
    Baena-Cagnani, Carlos E.
    Patel, Piyush
    [J]. CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2010, 26 (09) : 2047 - 2055
  • [3] Evaluating approved medications to treat allergic rhinitis in the United States: an evidence-based review of efficacy for nasal symptoms by class
    Benninger, Michael
    Farrar, Judith R.
    Blaiss, Michael
    Chipps, Bradley
    Ferguson, Berrylin
    Krouse, John
    Marple, Bradley
    Storms, William
    Kaliner, Michael
    [J]. ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY, 2010, 104 (01) : 13 - 29
  • [4] MP29-02 for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis: a review of clinical pharmacology, efficacy and safety
    Berger, William E.
    [J]. EXPERT REVIEW OF CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2013, 9 (09) : 803 - 811
  • [5] A 26-week tolerability study of ciclesonide nasal aerosol in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis
    Berger, William E.
    Mohar, Dale E.
    LaForce, Craig
    Raphael, Gordon
    Desai, Shailesh Y.
    Huang, Holly
    Hinkle, Joseph
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RHINOLOGY & ALLERGY, 2012, 26 (04) : 302 - 307
  • [6] Safety and efficacy of olopatadine hydrochloride nasal spray 0.6% in pediatric subjects with allergic rhinitis
    Berger, William E.
    Ratner, Paul H.
    Casale, Thomas B.
    Meltzer, Eli O.
    Wall, G. Michael
    [J]. ALLERGY AND ASTHMA PROCEEDINGS, 2009, 30 (06) : 612 - 623
  • [7] MP29-02: a breakthrough for the treatment of allergic rhinitis
    Bernstein, Jonathan A.
    [J]. EXPERT OPINION ON PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2013, 14 (15) : 2101 - 2113
  • [8] Double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of reformulated azelastine nasal spray in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis
    Bernstein, Jonathan A.
    Prenner, Bruce
    Ferguson, Berrylin J.
    Portnoy, Jay
    Wheeler, William J.
    Sacks, Harry J.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RHINOLOGY & ALLERGY, 2009, 23 (05) : 512 - 517
  • [9] Ocular and nasal allergy symptom burden in America: The Allergies, Immunotherapy, and RhinoconjunctivitiS (AIRS) surveys
    Bielory, Leonard
    Skoner, David P.
    Blaiss, Michael S.
    Leatherman, Bryan
    Dykewicz, Mark S.
    Smith, Nancy
    Ortiz, Gabriel
    Hadley, James A.
    Walstein, Nicole
    Craig, Timothy J.
    Allen-Ramey, Felicia
    [J]. ALLERGY AND ASTHMA PROCEEDINGS, 2014, 35 (03) : 211 - 218
  • [10] Allergic rhinitis: Direct and indirect costs
    Blaiss, Michael S.
    [J]. ALLERGY AND ASTHMA PROCEEDINGS, 2010, 31 (05) : 375 - 380