Effects of economic policy uncertainty shocks on the interdependence between Bitcoin and traditional financial markets

被引:61
作者
Matkovskyy, Roman [1 ]
Jalan, Akanksha [1 ]
Dowling, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] Rennes Sch Business, Dept Finance & Accounting, 2 Rue Robert dArbrissel,CS 76522, F-35065 Rennes, Ille & Vilaine, France
关键词
Bitcoin; Financial market; Interdependence; Policy uncertainty; Dynamic copula; BVAR; VOLATILITY; RETURNS; CRYPTOCURRENCIES; IMPACT; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.qref.2020.02.004
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper analyses the effects of economic policy uncertainty (hereafter, EPU) on the relationship between Bitcoin and traditional financial markets during the period 27/04/2015 to 25/10/2018, represented by five stock market indices namely the NASDAQ100, S&P500, Euronext100, FTSE100 and NIKKEI225. EPU is measured in terms of economic policy, monetary policy, financial regulation, taxation policy, and the news-based policy uncertainty index for the U.S., U.K., Europe and Japan. By applying a variety of statistical techniques (multivariate EWMA models, Spearman's rho, the Diebold and Yilmaz (2012) spill-over index, GAS models with conditional multivariate Student-t distribution and time-varying scales and correlations, BVAR models with the Litterman/Minnesota priors and nonlinear impulse responses with local projections accounting for different regimes in uncertainty) we estimate interdependence between traditional financial and Bitcoin markets and their reaction to the selected policy shocks. Our findings indicate the investment attractiveness of bitcoin as a hedging tool against shocks in uncertainty in the USA economic policy. The results are significant and potentially useful to researchers, practitioners, and Bitcoin market participants to better understand the nature of Bitcoin and facilitate better portfolio and risk-management decisions. (C) 2020 Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:150 / 155
页数:6
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] Does consumer confidence affect durable goods spending during bad and good economic times equally?
    Ahmedl, M. Iqbal
    Cassou, Steven P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MACROECONOMICS, 2016, 50 : 86 - 97
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2017, CRYPTOCURRENCY REACT
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2018, WORKING PAPER
  • [4] Dynamic co-movements of stock market returns, implied volatility and policy uncertainty
    Antonakakis, Nikolaos
    Chatziantoniou, Ioannis
    Filis, George
    [J]. ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2013, 120 (01) : 87 - 92
  • [5] Arbatli E. C., 2017, WORKING PAPER
  • [6] Economic policy uncertainty and stock markets: Long-run evidence from the US
    Arouri, Mohamed
    Estay, Christophe
    Rault, Christophe
    Roubaud, David
    [J]. FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2016, 18 : 136 - 141
  • [7] Auerbach A. J., 2013, NBER WORKING PAPER S, V17447
  • [8] Measuring the Output Responses to Fiscal Policy
    Auerbach, Alan J.
    Gorodnichenko, Yuriy
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-ECONOMIC POLICY, 2012, 4 (02) : 1 - 27
  • [9] The impact of uncertainty shocks on the volatility of commodity prices
    Bakas, Dimitrios
    Triantafyllou, Athanasios
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MONEY AND FINANCE, 2018, 87 : 96 - 111
  • [10] Measuring Economic Policy Uncertainty
    Baker, Scott R.
    Bloom, Nicholas
    Davis, Steven J.
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2016, 131 (04) : 1593 - 1636