How Do Healthy Women Perceive the Risk of Breast Cancer? The Role of Illness Perceptions and Compared Risk between Portugal and the UAE

被引:1
作者
Figueiras, Maria J. [1 ]
Dias Neto, David [2 ]
Maroco, Joao [3 ]
Carmo, Catarina [4 ]
机构
[1] Zayed Univ, Coll Nat Hlth & Sci, Dept Psychol, POB 144534, Abu Dhabi, U Arab Emirates
[2] ISPA Inst Univ, APPsyCI Appl Psychol Res Ctr Capabil & Inclus, P-1149041 Lisbon, Portugal
[3] ISPA Inst Univ, William James Ctr Res, P-1149041 Lisbon, Portugal
[4] ISPA Inst Univ, Sch Psychol, P-1149041 Lisbon, Portugal
关键词
breast cancer; illness perceptions; risk perception; compared risk; cultural context; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; DIAGNOSIS; METAANALYSIS; DISTRESS; BEHAVIOR; SENSE; WORRY; AGE;
D O I
10.3390/ijerph191912923
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
(1) Background: Breast cancer (BC) shows significant epidemiological differences between Eastern and Western countries. These may arise from socio-cultural factors influencing how healthy young women perceive this condition, their risk of getting cancer, and the implications for preventive screening behaviors. In this study, the illness perceptions, individual risk perception, compared risk, and beliefs about preventive behaviors for BC of female university students were compared using an anonymous online survey between a European country (Portugal) and the United Arab Emirates. (2) Method: A structural equation model (SEM) was developed to investigate the hypothetical relationship between illness perceptions and compared risk as predictors of perceived risk for BC. (3) Results: There were significant differences between the study variables. The SEM was invariant, but the differences between regression coefficients in both countries were highly statistically significant. Mediation analyses revealed a significant indirect effect of compared risk on individual risk and a significantly stronger direct effect for the Emirati sample. (4) Conclusions: These findings suggest that cultural research may help to explain factors that may shape social comparison of individual risk characteristics and influence perceived risk. Moreover, providing culturally appropriate strategies to be designed and implemented can promote early detection behaviors for BC.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
Al-Shamsi HO, 2018, J CANC PREV CURR RES, V9, P123, DOI DOI 10.15406/JCPCR.2018.09.00334
[2]   Breast Cancer Epidemiology in Gulf Cooperation Council Countries: A Regional and International Comparison [J].
Albeshan, Salman M. ;
Mackey, Martin G. ;
Hossain, Syeda Z. ;
Alfuraih, Abdulrahman A. ;
Brennan, Patrick C. .
CLINICAL BREAST CANCER, 2018, 18 (03) :E381-E392
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2011, OXFORD HDB HLTH PSYC, DOI DOI 10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780195342819.013.0013
[4]   Breast cancer knowledge, attitude and practice among medical and non-medical university students [J].
Anwar, Manal Mohamed ;
Khalil, Doaa Mahmoud .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH-HEIDELBERG, 2021, 29 (04) :871-878
[5]  
Badr Lina Kurdahi, 2018, Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, V19, P2109, DOI 10.22034/APJCP.2018.19.8.2109
[6]   Meta-analysis of the relationship between risk perception and health behavior: The example of vaccination [J].
Brewer, Noel T. ;
Chapman, Gretchen B. ;
Gibbons, Frederick X. ;
Gerrard, Meg ;
McCaul, Kevin D. ;
Weinstein, Neil D. .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 26 (02) :136-145
[7]   The Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire [J].
Broadbent, Elizabeth ;
Petrie, Keith J. ;
Main, Jodie ;
Weinman, John .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 2006, 60 (06) :631-637
[8]   A systematic review and meta-analysis of the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire [J].
Broadbent, Elizabeth ;
Wilkes, Carissa ;
Koschwanez, Heidi ;
Weinman, John ;
Norton, Sam ;
Petrie, Keith J. .
PSYCHOLOGY & HEALTH, 2015, 30 (11) :1361-1385
[9]   Risk perceptions, worry, and attitudes about genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility [J].
Cameron, LD ;
Reeve, J .
PSYCHOLOGY & HEALTH, 2006, 21 (02) :211-230
[10]   Illness risk representations and motivations to engage in protective behavior: The case of skin cancer risk [J].
Cameron, Linda D. .
PSYCHOLOGY & HEALTH, 2008, 23 (01) :91-112