Development of a Taxonomy of Keywords for Engineering Education Research

被引:0
作者
Finelli, Cynthia J. [1 ,2 ]
Borrego, Maura [3 ,4 ]
Rasoulifar, Golnoosh [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Elect Engn & Comp Sci, 208 Gorguze Family Lab,2609 Draper Dr, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Ctr Res Learning & Teaching Engn, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Univ Texas Austin, Mech Engn, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[4] Univ Texas Austin, Curriculum & Instruct, Austin, TX 78712 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
educational level; educational setting; outcomes; research approaches; theoretical frameworks; DISCIPLINE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The diversity of engineering education research provides an opportunity for cross-fertilization of ideas and creativity, but it also can result in fragmentation of the field and duplication of effort. One solution is to establish a standardized taxonomy of engineering education terms to map the field and communicate and connect research initiatives. This report describes the process for developing such a taxonomy, the EER Taxonomy. Although the taxonomy focuses on engineering education research in the United States, inclusive efforts have engaged 266 individuals from 149 cities in 30 countries during one multiday workshop, seven conference sessions, and several other virtual and in-person activities. The resulting taxonomy comprises 455 terms arranged in 14 branches and six levels. This taxonomy was found to satisfy four criteria for validity and reliability: (1) keywords assigned to a set of abstracts were reproducible by multiple researchers, (2) the taxonomy comprised terms that could be selected as keywords to fully describe 243 articles in three journals, (3) the keywords for those 243 articles were evenly distributed across the branches of the taxonomy, and (4) the authors of 31 conference papers agreed with 90% of researcher-assigned keywords. This report also describes guidelines developed to help authors consistently assign keywords for their articles by encouraging them to choose terms from three categories: (1) context/focus/topic, (2) purpose/target/motivation, and (3) research approach.
引用
收藏
页码:219 / 241
页数:23
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Engineering education in research-intensive universities [J].
Alpay, E. ;
Jones, M. E. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2012, 37 (06) :609-626
[2]   Changing Engineering Education: Views of US Faculty, Chairs, and Deans [J].
Besterfield-Sacre, Mary ;
Cox, Monica F. ;
Borrego, Maura ;
Beddoes, Kacey ;
Zhu, Jiabin .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2014, 103 (02) :193-219
[3]  
Bishop M., 2014, HDB RES ED COMMUNICA, P565
[4]  
Borrego M., 2013, WORKSH 2013 EUR SOC
[5]  
Borrego M., 2011, Journal of Engineering Education, V100, P14, DOI [DOI 10.1002/J.2168-9830.2011.TB00003.X, 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00003.x]
[6]   Development of engineering education as a rigorous discipline: A study of the publication patterns of four coalitions [J].
Borrego, Maura .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2007, 96 (01) :5-18
[7]  
Case J., 2011, Journal of Engineering Education, V100, P186, DOI [10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00008.x, DOI 10.1002/J.2168-9830.2011.TB00008.X]
[8]  
Finelli C., 2015, EER TAXONOMY VERSION
[9]  
Finelli C. J., 2014, P 2014 ASEE ANN C IN
[10]  
Finelli C.J., 2014, FRONTIERS ED ANN C M, DOI DOI 10.1109/FIE.2014.7044084