Ipilimumab alone or ipilimumab plus anti-PD-1 therapy in patients with metastatic melanoma resistant to anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy: a multicentre, retrospective, cohort study

被引:208
作者
Stratigos, Alexander J. [1 ]
Sekulic, Aleksandar [2 ]
Peris, Ketty [3 ,4 ]
Bechter, Oliver [5 ]
Prey, Sorilla [6 ]
Kaatz, Martin [7 ]
Lewis, Karl D. [8 ]
Basset-Seguin, Nicole [9 ]
Chang, Anne Lynn S. [10 ]
Dalle, Stephane [11 ]
Orland, Almudena Fernandez [12 ]
Licitra, Lisa [13 ,14 ]
Robert, Caroline [15 ,16 ]
Ulrich, Claas [17 ]
Hauschild, Axel [18 ]
Migden, Michael R. [19 ]
Dummer, Reinhard [20 ]
Li, Siyu [21 ]
Yoo, Suk-Young [21 ]
Mohan, Kosalai [22 ]
Coates, Ebony [22 ]
Jankovic, Vladimir [22 ]
Fiaschi, Nathalie [22 ]
Okoye, Emmanuel [22 ]
Bassukas, Ioannis D. [23 ]
Loquai, Carmen [24 ]
De Giorgi, Vincenzo [25 ]
Eroglu, Zeynep [26 ]
Gutzmer, Ralf [27 ]
Ulrich, Jens [28 ]
Puig, Susana [29 ,30 ]
Seebach, Frank [22 ]
Thurston, Gavin [22 ]
Weinreich, David M. [22 ]
Yancopoulos, George D. [22 ]
Lowy, Israel [22 ]
Bowler, Timothy [22 ]
Fury, Matthew G. [22 ]
机构
[1] Natl & Kapodistrian Univ Athens, Andreas Syggros Hosp, Dept Dermatol Venereol 1, Athens, Greece
[2] Arizona Mayo Clin, Phoenix, AZ USA
[3] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
[4] Fdn Policlin Univ A Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
[5] Univ Hosp, Dept Gen Med Oncol, Leuven, Belgium
[6] Univ Med Ctr, Dept Dermatol, Bordeaux, France
[7] SRH Wald Klinikum Gera, Gera, Germany
[8] Univ Colorado Canc Ctr, Aurora, CO USA
[9] Hop St Louis, Paris, France
[10] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Dermatol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[11] Lyon Canc Res Ctr, HCL Canc Inst, Dept Dermatol, Lyon, France
[12] Hosp Univ Virgen Macarena, Seville, Spain
[13] Fdn IRCCS, Ist Nazl Tumori, Milan, Italy
[14] Univ Milan, Dept Oncol & Hematol Oncol, Milan, Italy
[15] Gustave Roussy Canc Ctr, Dermatol Unit, Vilkjuif, France
[16] Paris Saclay Univ, Vilkjuif, France
[17] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Berlin, Germany
[18] Univ Kiel, Dept Dermatol, Kiel, Germany
[19] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[20] Univ Hosp Zurich, Dept Dermatol, Zurich, Switzerland
[21] Regeneron Pharmaceut, Basking Ridge, NJ USA
[22] Regeneron Pharmaceut, Tarrytown, NY USA
[23] Univ Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
[24] Univ Med Ctr Mainz, Dept Dermatol, Mainz, Germany
[25] Univ Florence, Dept Dermatol, Florence, Italy
[26] H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr & Res Inst, Dept Cutaneous Oncol, Tampa, FL USA
[27] Hannover Med Sch, Skin Canc Ctr Hannover, Dept Dermatol & Allergy, Hannover, Germany
[28] Harz Clin, Dept Dermatol, Skin Canc Ctr, Quedlinburg, Germany
[29] Univ Barcelona, Inst Invest Biomed August Pi & Sunyer IDIBAPS, Hosp Clin Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
[30] Inst Salud Carlos III, Ctr Invest Biomed Red Enfermedadees Raras CIBERER, Barcelona, Spain
关键词
CUTANEOUS SQUAMOUS-CELL; BASAL-CELL; DOUBLE-BLIND; OPEN-LABEL; VISMODEGIB; EFFICACY; PHASE-2; SAFETY; UPDATE; HUMANIZATION;
D O I
10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00126-1
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Findings We included 355 patients with metastatic melanoma, resistant to anti-PD-(L)1 (nivolumab, pembrolizumab, or atezolizumab), who had been treated with ipilimumab monotherapy (n=162 [46%]) or ipilimumab plus anti-PD-1 (n=193 [54%]) between Feb 1, 2011, and Feb 6, 2020. At a median follow-up of 22 center dot 1 months (IQR 9 center dot 5-30 center dot 9), the objective response rate was higher with ipilimumab plus anti-PD-1 (60 [31%] of 193 patients) than with ipilimumab monotherapy (21 [13%] of 162 patients; p<0 center dot 0001). Overall survival was longer in the ipilimumab plus anti-PD-1 group (median overall survival 20 center dot 4 months [95% CI 12 center dot 7-34 center dot 8]) than with ipilimumab monotherapy (8 center dot 8 months [6 center dot 1-11 center dot 3]; hazard ratio [HR] 0 center dot 50, 95% CI 0 center dot 38-0 center dot 66; p<0 center dot 0001). Progression-free survival was also longer with ipilimumab plus anti-PD-1 (median 3 center dot 0 months [95% CI 2 center dot 6-3 center dot 6]) than with ipilimumab (2 center dot 6 months [2 center dot 4-2 center dot 9]; HR 0 center dot 69, 95% CI 0 center dot 55-0 center dot 87; p=0 center dot 0019). Similar proportions of patients reported grade 3-5 adverse events in both groups (59 [31%] of 193 patients in the ipilimumab plus anti-PD-1 group vs 54 [33%] of 162 patients in the ipilimumab group). The most common grade 3-5 adverse events were diarrhoea or colitis (23 [12%] of 193 patients in the ipilimumab plus anti-PD-1 group vs 33 [20%] of 162 patients in the ipilimumab group) and increased alanine aminotransferase or aspartate aminotransferase (24 [12%] vs 15 [9%]). One death occurred with ipilimumab 26 days after the last treatment: a colon perforation due to immune-related pancolitis. Summary Background Anti-PD-1 therapy (hereafter referred to as anti-PD-1) induces long-term disease control in approximately 30% of patients with metastatic melanoma; however, two-thirds of patients are resistant and will require further treatment. We aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of ipilimumab plus anti-PD-1 (pembrolizumab or nivolumab) compared with ipilimumab monotherapy in patients who are resistant to anti-PD-(L)1 therapy (hereafter referred to as anti-PD-[L]1). Methods This multicentre, retrospective, cohort study, was done at 15 melanoma centres in Australia, Europe, and the USA. We included adult patients (aged >= 18 years) with metastatic melanoma (unresectable stage III and IV), who were resistant to anti-PD-(L)1 (innate or acquired resistance) and who then received either ipilimumab monotherapy or ipilimumab plus anti-PD-1 (pembrolizumab or nivolumab), based on availability of therapies or clinical factors determined by the physician, or both. Tumour response was assessed as per standard of care (CT or PET-CT scans every 3 months). The study endpoints were objective response rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety of ipilimumab compared with ipilimumab plus anti-PD-1. Findings We included 355 patients with metastatic melanoma, resistant to anti-PD-(L)1 (nivolumab, pembrolizumab, or atezolizumab), who had been treated with ipilimumab monotherapy (n=162 [46%]) or ipilimumab plus anti-PD-1 (n=193 [54%]) between Feb 1, 2011, and Feb 6, 2020. At a median follow-up of 22 & middot;1 months (IQR 9 & middot;5-30 & middot;9), the objective response rate was higher with ipilimumab plus anti-PD-1 (60 [31%] of 193 patients) than with ipilimumab monotherapy (21 [13%] of 162 patients; p<0 & middot;0001). Overall survival was longer in the ipilimumab plus anti-PD-1 group (median overall survival 20 & middot;4 months [95% CI 12 & middot;7-34 & middot;8]) than with ipilimumab monotherapy (8 & middot;8 months [6 & middot;1-11 & middot;3]; hazard ratio [HR] 0 & middot;50, 95% CI 0 & middot;38-0 & middot;66; p<0 & middot;0001). Progression-free survival was also longer with ipilimumab plus anti-PD-1 (median 3 & middot;0 months [95% CI 2 & middot;6-3 & middot;6]) than with ipilimumab (2 & middot;6 months [2 & middot;4-2 & middot;9]; HR 0 & middot;69, 95% CI 0 & middot;55-0 & middot;87; p=0 & middot;0019). Similar proportions of patients reported grade 3-5 adverse events in both groups (59 [31%] of 193 patients in the ipilimumab plus anti-PD-1 group vs 54 [33%] of 162 patients in the ipilimumab group). The most common grade 3-5 adverse events were diarrhoea or colitis (23 [12%] of 193 patients in the ipilimumab plus anti-PD-1 group vs 33 [20%] of 162 patients in the ipilimumab group) and increased alanine aminotransferase or aspartate aminotransferase (24 [12%] vs 15 [9%]). One death occurred with ipilimumab 26 days after the last treatment: a colon perforation due to immune-related pancolitis. Interpretation In patients who are resistant to anti-PD-(L)1, ipilimumab plus anti-PD-1 seemed to yield higher efficacy than ipilimumab with a higher objective response rate, longer progression-free, and longer overall survival, with a similar rate of grade 3-5 toxicity. Ipilimumab plus anti-PD-1 should be favoured over ipilimumab alone as a second-line immunotherapy for these patients with advanced melanoma. Funding None. Copyright (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Methods This multicentre, retrospective, cohort study, was done at 15 melanoma centres in Australia, Europe, and the USA. We included adult patients (aged >= 18 years) with metastatic melanoma (unresectable stage III and IV), who were resistant to anti-PD-(L)1 (innate or acquired resistance) and who then received either ipilimumab monotherapy or ipilimumab plus anti-PD-1 (pembrolizumab or nivolumab), based on availability of therapies or clinical factors determined by the physician, or both. Tumour response was assessed as per standard of care (CT or PET-CT scans every 3 months). The study endpoints were objective response rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety of ipilimumab compared with ipilimumab plus anti-PD-1.
引用
收藏
页码:848 / 857
页数:10
相关论文
共 31 条
[31]   Basal-Cell Carcinoma Incidence and Associated Risk Factors in US Women and Men [J].
Wu, Shaowei ;
Han, Jiali ;
Li, Wen-Qing ;
Li, Tricia ;
Qureshi, Abrar A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2013, 178 (06) :890-897