Comparing Pediatric Ureteroscopy Outcomes with SuperPulsed Thulium Fiber Laser and Low-Power Holmium:YAG Laser EDITORIAL COMMENT

Purpose:The thulium fiber laser is a promising new lithoptripsy technology never before studied in the pediatric population. Our center adopted the first platform in North America, the SuperPulsed thulium fiber laser (SPTF). We aimed to compare outcomes in pediatric ureteroscopy using the SPTF to those using the gold standard, low-power holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG) laser.Materials and Methods:This is a retrospective, consecutive cohort study of unilateral ureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy performed in pediatric patients from 2016 to 2021 as an early adopter of the SPTF. Thirty-day complications and stone-free status, defined as the absence of a stone fragment on followup imaging within 90 days, were analyzed using logistic regression. Operative times were compared using linear regression. Propensity scores for use of SPTF were used in regression analyses to account for potential cohort imbalance.Results:A total of 125 cases were performed in 109 pediatric patients: 93 with Ho:YAG and 32 with SPTF. No significant difference was noted in age (p=0.2), gender (p=0.6), stone burden (p >0.9) or stone location (p=0.1). The overall stone-free rate was 62%; 70% with SPTF and 59% with Ho:YAG. The odds of having a residual stone fragment were significantly lower with SPTF than with Ho:YAG (OR=0.39, 95% CI: 0.19-0.77, p=0.01). There was no significant difference in operative time (p=0.8). Seven (25%) complications were noted with SPTF and 19 (22%) with Ho:YAG (p=0.6).Conclusions:The SPTF laser was associated with a higher stone-free rate than the low-power Ho:YAG laser without compromising operative time and safety. © 2022 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. All rights reserved.