What is observable from wall data in turbulent channel flow?

被引:21
作者
Wang, Qi [1 ]
Wang, Mengze [1 ]
Zaki, Tamer A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
关键词
variational methods; chaos; ENSEMBLE DATA ASSIMILATION; OSSE-BASED EVALUATION; STATE ESTIMATION; DISCRETE-ADJOINT; BOUNDARY-LAYERS; RECONSTRUCTION; EQUATIONS; DYNAMICS; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1017/jfm.2022.295
中图分类号
O3 [力学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0801 ;
摘要
Estimation of the initial state of turbulent channel flow from spatially and temporally resolved wall data is performed using adjoint-variational data assimilation. The estimated flow fields satisfy the Navier-Stokes equations and minimize a cost function defined as the difference between model predictions and the available observations. The accuracy of the predicted flow deteriorates with distance from the wall, most precipitously across the buffer layer beyond which only large-scale structures are reconstructed. To explain this trend, we examine the domain of dependence of the observations and the Hessian matrix of the state-estimation cost function, both of which are efficiently evaluated using adjoint fields initiated from impulses at wall sensors. Eigenanalysis of the Hessian is performed, and the eigenvalues are related to the capacity to reconstruct flow structures represented by the eigenvectors. Most of the eigenmodes decay beyond the buffer layer, thus demonstrating weak sensitivity of wall observations to the turbulence in the bulk. However, when the measurement time t(m)(+) greater than or similar to 20, some streamwise-elongated Hessian eigenfunctions remain finite in the outer flow, and correspond to the sensitivity of wall observations to outer large-scale motions. At much longer observation times, the adjoint field becomes chaotic as it amplifies exponentially, which is indicative of extreme gradients of the cost function and an ill-conditioned Hessian matrix, and both exacerbate the difficulty of estimating turbulence from wall observations.
引用
收藏
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Very large-scale structures and their effects on the wall shear-stress fluctuations in a turbulent channel flow up to Reτ=640 [J].
Abe, H ;
Kawamura, H ;
Choi, H .
JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2004, 126 (05) :835-843
[2]   STOCHASTIC ESTIMATION OF ORGANIZED TURBULENT STRUCTURE - HOMOGENEOUS SHEAR-FLOW [J].
ADRIAN, RJ ;
MOIN, P .
JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 1988, 190 :531-559
[3]   Skin friction and pressure: the "footprints" of turbulence [J].
Bewley, TR ;
Protas, B .
PHYSICA D-NONLINEAR PHENOMENA, 2004, 196 (1-2) :28-44
[4]   Observation-infused simulations of high-speed boundary-layer transition [J].
Buchta, David A. ;
Zaki, Tamer A. .
JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 2021, 916
[5]  
CANTWELL B, 1978, J FLUID MECH, V87, P641, DOI 10.1017/S0022112078001809
[6]   Feasibility Analysis of Ensemble Sensitivity Computation in Turbulent Flows [J].
Chandramoorthy, Nisha ;
Fernandez, Pablo ;
Talnikar, Chaitanya ;
Wang, Qiqi .
AIAA JOURNAL, 2019, 57 (10) :4514-4526
[7]   4D large scale variational data assimilation of a turbulent flow with a dynamics error model [J].
Chandramouli, Pranav ;
Memin, Etienne ;
Heitz, Dominique .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2020, 412
[8]   State estimation in wall-bounded flow systems. Part 2. Turbulent flows [J].
Chevalier, M ;
Hoepffner, J ;
Bewley, TR ;
Henningson, DS .
JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 2006, 552 :167-187
[9]   State estimation in wall-bounded flow systems. Part 3. The ensemble Kalman filter [J].
Colburn, C. H. ;
Cessna, J. B. ;
Bewley, T. R. .
JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 2011, 682 :289-303
[10]   IS NAVIER-STOKES TURBULENCE CHAOTIC [J].
DEISSLER, RG .
PHYSICS OF FLUIDS, 1986, 29 (05) :1453-1457