Prostate-specific Antigen Density Toward a Better Cutoff to Identify Better Candidates for Active Surveillance

被引:28
作者
Ha, Yun-Sok
Yu, Jihyeong
Salmasi, Amirali Hassanzadeh
Patel, Neal
Parihar, Jaspreet
Singer, Eric A.
Kim, Jeong Hyun
Kwon, Tae Gyun
Kim, Wun-Jae
Kim, Isaac Yi [1 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers State Univ, Rutgers Canc Inst New Jersey, Sect Urol Oncol, New Brunswick, NJ 08903 USA
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
AFRICAN-AMERICAN MEN; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; LOW-RISK; PATHOLOGICAL OUTCOMES; CANCER PATIENTS; VOLUME; FEATURES; PROGRAM;
D O I
10.1016/j.urology.2014.02.038
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE To investigate the impact of prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) on existing prostate cancer (PCa) active surveillance (AS) protocols. METHODS Prospectively maintained database on men with PCa who underwent radical prostatectomy was reviewed retrospectively. Demographic data and pathologic characteristics of patients who fulfilled the AS inclusion criteria under the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), Prostate Cancer Research International Active Surveillance (PRIAS), and University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) guidelines were examined. RESULTS Of 930 patients, 231, 280, and 325 fulfilled the NCCN, PRIAS, and UCSF AS criteria, respectively. The frequencies of advanced disease on surgical pathology (upstaging and/or upgrading) were 31.6% (NCCN), 35.4% (PRIAS), and 34.2% (UCSF) of the study cohorts. PSAD was significantly higher in patients with advanced disease compared with that in patients with nonadvanced disease in all 3 AS schemas. Modifying the PRIAS and UCSF criteria using the NCCN's lower PSAD cutoff of 0.15 ng/mL(2) decreased the rates of the advanced disease significantly to 33.5% and 31.4%, respectively. Using the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the optimal PSAD cutoff level for the prediction of advanced disease was 0.085 ng/mL(2) (sensitivity/specificity of 76.7%/ 50.6% in NCCN and 75.6%/ 49.7% in PRIAS). CONCLUSION Among patients with low-risk PCa who underwent radical prostatectomy, PSAD is a predictor of advanced disease at the time of surgery. Adopting a lower PSAD threshold of 0.085 ng/mL(2) decreased the risk of the advanced disease to 17.5%-21.7%. Therefore, PSAD should be part of all AS guidelines. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:365 / 371
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Role of Prostate Specific Antigen and Immediate Confirmatory Biopsy in Predicting Progression During Active Surveillance for Low Risk Prostate Cancer
    Adamy, Ari
    Yee, David S.
    Matsushita, Kazuhito
    Maschino, Alexandra
    Cronin, Angel
    Vickers, Andrew
    Guillonneau, Bertrand
    Scardino, Peter T.
    Eastham, James A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 185 (02) : 477 - 482
  • [2] Active Surveillance for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Worldwide: The PRIAS Study
    Bul, Meelan
    Zhu, Xiaoye
    Valdagni, Riccardo
    Pickles, Tom
    Kakehi, Yoshiyuki
    Rannikko, Antti
    Bjartell, Anders
    van der Schoot, Deric K.
    Cornel, Erik B.
    Conti, Giario N.
    Boeve, Egbert R.
    Staerman, Frederic
    Vis-Maters, Jenneke J.
    Vergunst, Henk
    Jaspars, Joris J.
    Stroelin, Petra
    van Muilekom, Erik
    Schroder, Fritz H.
    Bangma, Chris H.
    Roobol, Monique J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2013, 63 (04) : 597 - 603
  • [3] Pathological Outcomes of Candidates for Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer
    Conti, Simon L.
    Dall'Era, Marc
    Fradet, Vincent
    Cowan, Janet E.
    Simko, Jeffery
    Carroll, Peter R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 181 (04) : 1628 - 1633
  • [4] Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: Progress and Promise
    Cooperberg, Matthew R.
    Carroll, Peter R.
    Klotz, Laurence
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 29 (27) : 3669 - 3676
  • [5] Active surveillance for the management of prostate cancer in a contemporary cohort
    Dall'Era, Marc A.
    Konety, Badrinath R.
    Cowan, Janet E.
    Shinohara, Katsuto
    Stauf, Frank
    Cooperberg, Matthew R.
    Meng, Maxwell V.
    Kane, Christopher J.
    Perez, Nanette
    Master, Viraj A.
    Carroll, Peter R.
    [J]. CANCER, 2008, 112 (12) : 2664 - 2670
  • [6] PATHOLOGICAL AND CLINICAL FINDINGS TO PREDICT TUMOR EXTENT OF NONPALPABLE (STAGE-T1C) PROSTATE-CANCER
    EPSTEIN, JI
    WALSH, PC
    CARMICHAEL, M
    BRENDLER, CB
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1994, 271 (05): : 368 - 374
  • [7] Comparison of preoperative prostate specific antigen density and prostate specific antigen for predicting recurrence after radical prostatectomy: Results from the search data base
    Freedland, SJ
    Kane, CJ
    Presti, JC
    Terris, MK
    Amling, CL
    Dorey, F
    Aronson, WJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 169 (03) : 969 - 973
  • [8] Ganz Patricia A, 2011, NIH Consens State Sci Statements, V28, P1
  • [9] Increased Incidence of Pathologically Nonorgan Confined Prostate Cancer in African-American Men Eligible for Active Surveillance
    Ha, Yun-Sok
    Salmasi, Amirali
    Karellas, Michael
    Singer, Eric A.
    Kim, Jeong Hyun
    Han, Misop
    Partin, Alan W.
    Kim, Wun-Jae
    Lee, Dong Hyeon
    Kim, Isaac Yi
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2013, 81 (04) : 831 - 835
  • [10] EAU Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Clinically Localised Disease
    Heidenreich, Axel
    Bellmunt, Joaquim
    Bolla, Michel
    Joniau, Steven
    Mason, Malcolm
    Matveev, Vsevolod
    Mottet, Nicolas
    Schmid, Hans-Peter
    van der Kwast, Theo
    Wiegel, Thomas
    Zattoni, Filliberto
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2011, 59 (01) : 61 - 71