Generation expansion planning with revenue adequacy constraints

被引:10
作者
Guo, Cheng [1 ]
Bodur, Merve [1 ]
Papageorgiou, Dimitri J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Mech & Ind Engn, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] ExxonMobil Res & Engn Co, Corp Strateg Res, Houston, TX USA
关键词
OR in Energy; Generation expansion; Mixed-integer bilinear programming; Power system planning; Profitability; ELECTRICITY MARKET DESIGN; PART I; ENERGY; MODEL; TOOLS;
D O I
10.1016/j.cor.2022.105736
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Generation capacity expansion models have traditionally taken the vantage point of a centralized planner seeking to find cost-optimal generation capacity to reliably meet load over decadal time scales. Often assuming perfectly competitive players, these models attempt to provide guidance for system planners without necessarily ensuring that individual generators recover all of their costs from market revenues during their lifetime. In this work, we incorporate revenue adequacy constraints in a two-stage generation expansion planning model. After making generation investment decisions in the first stage, day-ahead unit commitment (UC) and dispatch decisions are made in the second stage, along with market-clearing pricing decisions. To approximate a market equilibrium, the duality gap between the second-stage non-convex UC problem and its linearly-relaxed dual is used as a regularizer. Case studies are presented to contrast a traditional planning model with our revenue adequacy-constrained model, which find that our model leads to different planning decisions. More specifically, our model invests in more renewable generation capacity by incurring a small increase in the total costs.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 40 条
[11]   PRIMAL-RELAXED DUAL GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION APPROACH [J].
FLOUDAS, CA ;
VISWESWARAN, V .
JOURNAL OF OPTIMIZATION THEORY AND APPLICATIONS, 1993, 78 (02) :187-225
[12]  
Frew B.A., 2016, REV SUFFICIENCY RELI
[13]   A comprehensive review on expansion planning: Models and tools for energy policy analysis [J].
Gacitua, L. ;
Gallegos, P. ;
Henriquez-Auba, R. ;
Lorca, A. ;
Negrete-Pincetic, M. ;
Olivares, D. ;
Valenzuela, A. ;
Wenzel, G. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2018, 98 :346-360
[14]  
Geoffrion A. M., 1972, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, V10, P237, DOI 10.1007/BF00934810
[15]  
Gurobi Optimization L, 2020, GUROBI OPTIMIZER REF
[16]  
Hogan W., 1992, Contract networks for electric power transmission: Technical reference
[17]   A Convex Primal Formulation for Convex Hull Pricing [J].
Hua, Bowen ;
Baldick, Ross .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2017, 32 (05) :3814-3823
[18]   Generation Investment Equilibria With Strategic Producers-Part I: Formulation [J].
Kazempour, S. Jalal ;
Conejo, Antonio J. ;
Ruiz, Carlos .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2013, 28 (03) :2613-2622
[19]   State-of-the-art generation expansion planning: A review [J].
Koltsaklis, Nikolaos E. ;
Dagoumas, Athanasios S. .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2018, 230 :563-589
[20]   Deterministic electric power infrastructure planning: Mixed-integer programming model and nested decomposition algorithm [J].
Lara, Cristiana L. ;
Mallapragada, Dharik S. ;
Papageorgiou, Dimitri J. ;
Venkatesh, Aranya ;
Grossmann, Ignacio E. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2018, 271 (03) :1037-1054