Contextualism and a puzzle about seeing

被引:7
作者
Neta, Ram [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
关键词
contextualism; perception;
D O I
10.1007/s11098-006-9021-8
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
Contextualist solutions to skeptical puzzles have recently been subjected to various criticisms. In this paper, I will defend contextualism against an objection pressed by Jason Stanley. In the course of doing so, I argue that either semantic context-sensitivity is very widespread in natural language, or else Stanley's "binding'' test for the presence of hidden variables in logical form is not a good test.
引用
收藏
页码:53 / 63
页数:11
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]  
BLACK M, 1964, PHILOS AM
[2]  
CLARKE T, 1964, SEEING SURFACES PHYS
[3]  
COHEN S, 1999, CONTEXTUALISM SKEPTI
[4]   The ordinary language basis for contextualism, and the new invariantism [J].
DeRose, K .
PHILOSOPHICAL QUARTERLY, 2005, 55 (219) :172-198
[5]   DISCRIMINATION AND PERCEPTUAL KNOWLEDGE [J].
GOLDMAN, AI .
JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 1976, 73 (20) :771-791
[6]  
LUDLOW P, 2005, CONTEXTUALISM NEW LI
[7]  
Pietroski Paul., 2005, Contextualism in Philosophy: Knowledge, Meaning, and Truth
[8]   From contextualism to contrastivism [J].
Schaffer, J .
PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES, 2004, 119 (1-2) :73-103
[9]   Context and logical form [J].
Stanley, J .
LINGUISTICS AND PHILOSOPHY, 2000, 23 (04) :391-434
[10]  
TOMBERLIN J, 1999, PHILOS PERSPECTIVES, V13