Impact of Cavity Shave Margins on Margin Status in Patients with Pure Ductal Carcinoma In Situ

被引:14
作者
Howard-McNatt, Marissa [1 ]
Dupont, Elisabeth [2 ]
Tsangaris, Theodore [3 ]
Garcia-Cantu, Carlos [4 ]
Chiba, Akiko [1 ]
Berger, Adam C. [3 ]
Levine, Edward A. [1 ]
Gass, Jennifer S. [5 ]
Ollila, David W. [6 ]
Chagpar, Anees B. [7 ]
机构
[1] Wake Forest Univ, Dept Surg, Winston Salem, NC 27101 USA
[2] Watson Clin, Dept Surg, Lakeland, FL USA
[3] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Dept Surg, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[4] Doctors Hosp Renaissance, Dept Surg, Edinburg, TX USA
[5] Women & Infants Hosp Rhode Isl, Dept Surg, Providence, RI USA
[6] Univ N Carolina, Dept Surg, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[7] Yale Univ, Dept Surg, New Haven, CT USA
关键词
BREAST-CONSERVING SURGERY; 20-YEAR FOLLOW-UP; LUMPECTOMY; MASTECTOMY; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.11.019
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: We examined the impact of cavity shave margins (CSMs) on margin status in patients with pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) undergoing partial mastectomy (PM). METHODS: One hundred and nine patients from 2 multicenter, randomized controlled trials were identified with pure DCIS (no invasive cancer). Surgeons performed their best PM, with specimen radiography and resection of selective margins per surgeon discretion. Patients were then randomized to have CSM resected or not. A positive margin was defined as <2 mm from ink. RESULTS: Median patient age was 63 years; median size of DCIS was 1.20 cm; 43.6% of patients had high-grade DCIS; and 58 (53.2%) patients were randomized to take CSM. The "shave" and "no-shave" groups were well-matched for age, race, ethnicity, palpability, grade, and size of DCIS. Although 33 (56.9%) of the patients in the shave group had a positive margin before randomization, only 12 (20.7%) had a positive margin after randomization to CSM (p < 0.001). In the no-shave group, 17 patients (33.3%) had a positive margin. Controlling for size and grade of DCIS, taking CSM resulted in a nearly 65% reduction in the positivemargin rate (odds ratio 0.366; 95% CI, 0.136 to 0.981; p = 0.046). Size of DCIS remained an independent predictor of positive margins in the model (odds ratio 1.646; 95% CI, 1.227 to 2.209; p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: CSM reduces positive-margin rates in patients with pure DCIS, and can be a practical solution for DCIS patients who tend to have a high rate of margin positivity. ((C) 2020 by the American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
引用
收藏
页码:373 / 378
页数:6
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Cavity Shave Margins in Breast Cancer
    Chagpar, Anees B.
    Killelea, Brigid K.
    Tsangaris, Theodore N.
    Butler, Meghan
    Stavris, Karen
    Li, Fangyong
    Yao, Xiaopan
    Bossuyt, Veerle
    Harigopal, Malini
    Lannin, Donald R.
    Pusztai, Lajos
    Horowitz, Nina R.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2015, 373 (06) : 503 - 510
  • [2] Dupont E, 2019, ANN SURG, V8
  • [3] Faverly DR, 1994, SEMIN DIAGN PATHOL, V11
  • [4] Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer
    Fisher, B
    Anderson, S
    Bryant, J
    Margolese, RG
    Deutsch, M
    Fisher, ER
    Jeong, J
    Wolmark, N
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 347 (16) : 1233 - 1241
  • [5] The Association of Surgical Margins and Local Recurrence in Women with Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancer Treated with Breast-Conserving Therapy: A Meta-Analysis
    Houssami, Nehmat
    Macaskill, Petra
    Marinovich, M. Luke
    Morrow, Monica
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 21 (03) : 717 - 730
  • [6] Excising Additional Margins at Initial Breast-Conserving Surgery (BCS) Reduces the Need for Re-excision in a Predominantly African American Population: A Report of a Randomized Prospective Study in a Public Hospital
    Jones, Veronica
    Linebarger, Jared
    Perez, Sebastian
    Gabram, Sheryl
    Okoli, Joel
    Bumpers, Harvey
    Burns, Brian
    Mosunjac, Marina
    Rizzo, Monica
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 23 (02) : 456 - 464
  • [7] Radioactive Seed Localization or Wire-guided Localization of Nonpalpable Invasive and In Situ Breast Cancer A Randomized, Multicenter, Open-label Trial
    Langhans, Linnea
    Tvedskov, Tove F.
    Klausen, Thomas L.
    Jensen, Maj-Britt
    Talman, Maj-Lis
    Vejborg, Ilse
    Benian, Cemil
    Roslind, Anne
    Hermansen, Jonas
    Oturai, Peter S.
    Bentzon, Niels
    Kroman, Niels
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2017, 266 (01) : 29 - 35
  • [8] Adoption of SSO-ASTRO Margin Guidelines for Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: What Is the Impact on Use of Additional Surgery?
    Mamtani, Anita
    Romanoff, Anya
    Baser, Raymond
    Vincent, Alain
    Morrow, Monica
    Gemignani, Mary L.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 28 (01) : 295 - 302
  • [9] Should New "No Ink On Tumor" Lumpectomy Margin Guidelines be Applied to Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS)? A Retrospective Review Using Shaved Cavity Margins
    Merrill, Andrea L.
    Tang, Rong
    Plichta, Jennifer K.
    Rai, Upahvan
    Coopey, Suzanne B.
    McEvoy, Maureen P.
    Hughes, Kevin S.
    Specht, Michelle C.
    Gadd, Michele A.
    Smith, Barbara L.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 23 (11) : 3453 - 3458
  • [10] Morrow M, 2016, PRACT RADIAT ONCOL, V6, P287, DOI [10.1200/JCO.2016.68.3573, 10.1016/j.prro.2016.06.011]