Validation of the 3M™ Molecular Detection Assay 2-STEC Gene Screen (stx) for the Detection of Shiga Toxin Gene (stx1 and/or stx2) in Additional Matrixes: AOAC Performance Tested MethodSM 071903

被引:1
作者
Rosauer, Micki L. [1 ]
Barnes, Christina [1 ]
Silbernagel, Karen M. [1 ]
Koch, Kateland M. [2 ]
Thompson-Strehlow, Leslie [3 ]
机构
[1] 3M Co, Food Safety Dept, St Paul, MN 55144 USA
[2] Q Labs, Microbiol Res & Dev Lab, Cincinnati, OH 45204 USA
[3] SGS Vanguard Sci Inc, Res & Dev, North Sioux City, SD USA
关键词
ESCHERICHIA-COLI; INFECTIONS;
D O I
10.1093/jaoacint/qsac014
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Background The 3M (TM) Molecular Detection Assay 2 - STEC Gene Screen (stx) method is based on gene amplification by the use of real-time loop-mediated isothermal amplification when used with the 3M Molecular Detection System for the rapid and specific detection of Shiga toxin gene (stx1 and/or stx2) from Shiga toxin-producing enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli (STEC) in enriched foods. Objective The 3M Molecular Detection Assay 2 - STEC Gene Screen (stx) method was evaluated as a Level 2 method modification to add new matrixes to the certified claim: 25 g fresh raw ground beef (approximately 75% lean), 375 g raw beef trim (approximately 75% lean), 375 g fresh raw ground pork (approximately 70% lean), 375 g fresh raw poultry parts, and 25 g sprouts. Methods Matrix studies were conducted to assess the method's performance compared to the US Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Microbiology Laboratory Guidebook, 5C.00 for meat and poultry, and to the US Food and Drug Administration Bacteriological Analytical Manual, Ch. 4A for sprouts, using an unpaired study design. Results The 3M Molecular Detection Assay 2 - STEC Gene Screen (stx) method demonstrated no significant differences between presumptive and confirmed results or between candidate and reference method results for any of the matrices tested.
引用
收藏
页码:1126 / 1135
页数:10
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Microbiology of Food and Animal Feeding StuffsGeneral Requirements and Guidance for Microbiological Examinations
[3]  
[Anonymous], 170252017 ISO IEC
[4]  
CDC Division of Health Informatics and Surveillance, 2018, NAT NOT DIS SURV SYS
[5]  
FDA (U.S. Food and Drug Administration), 2001, Bacteriology Analytical Manual (BAM) Chapter 3: Aerobic Plate Count
[6]   Transmission pathways for sporadic Shiga-toxin producing E. coli infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Kintz, Erica ;
Brainard, Julii ;
Hooper, Lee ;
Hunter, Paul .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYGIENE AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, 2017, 220 (01) :57-67
[7]   Global Incidence of Human Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli Infections and Deaths: A Systematic Review and Knowledge Synthesis [J].
Majowicz, Shannon E. ;
Scallan, Elaine ;
Jones-Bitton, Andria ;
Sargeant, Jan M. ;
Stapleton, Jackie ;
Angulo, Frederick J. ;
Yeung, Derrick H. ;
Kirk, Martyn D. .
FOODBORNE PATHOGENS AND DISEASE, 2014, 11 (06) :447-455
[8]  
National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2006, EST FOODB ILLN UN ST
[9]  
Stop Foodborne Illness, 2019, WHAT IS FOOD POISONI
[10]   Shiga-toxin-producing Escherichia coli and haemolytic uraemic syndrome [J].
Tarr, PI ;
Gordon, CA ;
Chandler, WL .
LANCET, 2005, 365 (9464) :1073-1086