Urological Education in United States Medical Schools: Where Are We Now and How Can We Do Better?

被引:4
作者
Kreshover, Jessica E. [1 ]
Vanni, Alex J. [2 ]
Sternberg, Kevan M. [3 ]
Bhojani, Naeem [4 ]
Kobashi, Kathleen C. [5 ]
机构
[1] Zucker Sch Med Hofstra Northwell, Lake Success, NY USA
[2] Lahey Hosp & Med Ctr, Burlington, VT USA
[3] Univ Vermont, Burlington, VT USA
[4] Univ Montreal, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[5] Houston Methodist Hosp, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
education; medical; curriculum; urology; STUDENT; DECLINE; BURDEN;
D O I
10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000336
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction:While urological complaints increase in aging populations and conditions commonly require management by multiple physician specialty types, exposure to formal urological education in United States medical schools is limited and has been decreasing over time. We aim to update the current status of urological education in the United States curriculum and delve further into the subject matter being taught and the type and timing of this education. Methods:An 11-question survey was developed to describe the current status of urological education. The survey was distributed using Survey Monkey to the American Urological Association's medical student listserv in November 2021. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize survey findings. Results:Of 879 invitations sent, 173 responded (20%). Most (112/173, 65%) of respondents were in their fourth year. Only 4 (2%) reported that their school had a required clinical urology rotation. Kidney stones (98%) and urinary tract infections (100%) were the most frequent topics taught. The least exposure included infertility (20%), urological emergencies (19%), bladder drainage (17%), and erectile dysfunction (13%). Videos and case vignettes were the preferred learning modalities and the majority (84%) of respondents were familiar with the American Urological Association's medical student curriculum material. Conclusions:The majority of United States medical schools do not have a required clinical urology rotation and some core urological topics are not taught at all. Future incorporation of urological educational material through video and case vignette learning may be the best opportunity to provide exposure to clinical topics that will commonly be encountered regardless of chosen medical discipline.
引用
收藏
页码:581 / 586
页数:8
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
American Urological Association, 2017, STATE UROLOGY WORKFO
[2]   Urologic disease burden in the United States: Veteran users of Department of Veterans Affairs healthcare [J].
Anger, Jennifer T. ;
Saigal, Christopher S. ;
Wang, MingMing ;
Yano, Elizabeth M. .
UROLOGY, 2008, 72 (01) :37-41
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1956, J Urol, V76, P309
[4]  
[Anonymous], COMPLEXITIES PHYS SU
[5]  
[Anonymous], AMBULATORY HLTH CARE
[6]  
Badalato GM, 2012, J Med Person, V10, P25
[7]   THE DECLINE OF UROLOGICAL EDUCATION IN UNITED-STATES MEDICAL-SCHOOLS [J].
BENSON, GS .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1994, 152 (01) :169-170
[8]   The AUA Curriculum for Medical Students: Current Resources and Developments [J].
Cohen, Seth A. .
CURRENT UROLOGY REPORTS, 2019, 20 (12)
[9]   The Inevitable Reimagining of Medical Education [J].
Emanuel, Ezekiel J. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2020, 323 (12) :1127-1128
[10]   What every graduating medical student should know about urology: The stakeholder viewpoint [J].
Kerfoot, B. Price ;
Turek, Paul J. .
UROLOGY, 2008, 71 (04) :549-553