Formal vs. Informal Coach Education: A Response to Commentaries

被引:171
作者
Lyle, John [1 ]
Mallett, Clifford J. [1 ]
Trudel, Pierre [2 ]
Rynne, Steven B. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Human Movement Studies, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia
[2] Univ Ottawa, Sch Human Kinet, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada
[3] Australian Sports Commiss, Coaching & Officiating Unit, Bruce Act 2616, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1260/174795409789623883
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The training of coaches is considered central to sustaining and improving the quality of sports coaching and the ongoing process of professionalisation. Sports coaches participate in a range of learning opportunities (informal to formal) that contribute to their development to varying degrees. In this article, we present our collective understanding on the varying types of learning opportunities and their contribution to coach accreditation and development. The authors presented these views (from a sports pedagogy perspective) as part of a workshop entitled "Formal vs. Informal Coach Education" at the 2007 International Council of Coach Education Master Class in Beijing. These reflections seek to stimulate the on-going, and often sterile, debate about formal versus informal coach education/learning in order to progress scholarship in coaching.
引用
收藏
页码:359 / 364
页数:6
相关论文
共 7 条
[1]   Sport experiences, milestones, and educational activities associated with high-performance coaches' development [J].
Erickson, Karl ;
Cote, Jean ;
Fraser-Thomas, Jessica .
SPORT PSYCHOLOGIST, 2007, 21 (03) :302-316
[2]  
FULLER A, 2003, J ED WORK, V16, P408
[3]  
Gilbert W., 2006, International Journal of Sports Science Coaching, V1, P69, DOI [DOI 10.1260/17479540, DOI 10.1260/174795406776338526]
[4]  
Hodkinson H., 2005, RES PAP EDUC, V20, P109
[5]  
Lynch M., 2006, Modern Athlete and Coach, V44, P15
[6]  
TRUDEL P, SPORTS COAC IN PRESS
[7]  
WERTHNER P, INT J SPORT IN PRESS