Theories of the Right of Secession: A Republican Analysis

被引:0
作者
Perez-Lozano, Lluis [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pompeu Fabra, Fac Polit & Social Sci, Dept Polit & Social Sci, Barcelona, Spain
来源
TORRES DE LUCCA-REVISTA INTERNACIONAL DE FILOSOFIA POLITICA | 2021年 / 10卷 / 18期
关键词
Adscriptivism; Factions; Plebiscitarianism; Remedialism; Republicanism; Secession; LIBERAL THEORY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
Republican theorists have paid little attention to the normative problems of secession conflicts. So far, there is no such thing as a democratic republican theory of the right of secession (TRS), nor any comprehensive analysis of current TRS has ever been undertaken from a democratic republican point of view. This article tries to fill this second gap as a previous step in order to approach the first one. In doing so, it is shown how secession conflicts pose threats for two core democratic republican values: freedom and inclusion. The threats are, concretely, those of exclusion, blackmailing minorities, arbitrary permanent majorities, and instability. The article also shows how, due to their respective pro-unionist or pro-secessionist biases, no current TRS seems to be able to handle those threats, and briefly outlines how a democratic republican TRS, based on a non-unilateralist logic, could be developed.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 87
页数:19
相关论文
共 41 条
[21]  
Ovejero F, 2006, CROMAGNON NACL CIUDA CROMAGNON NACL CIUDA
[22]  
Ovejero Felix, 2011, TRAMA ESTERIL IZQUIE
[23]   Democratic secession from a multinational state [J].
Patten, A .
ETHICS, 2002, 112 (03) :558-586
[24]  
Pavkovic Aleksandar., 2007, CREATING NEW STATES
[25]  
Pettit P., 1997, REPUBLICANISM THEORY
[26]  
Pettit P., 2012, PEOPLES TERMS REPUBL, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139017428
[27]  
Philpott Daniel., 1998, NATL SELF DETERMINAT, P79, DOI DOI 10.1093/0198293844.001.0001
[28]  
Renan Ernest., 1996, BECOMING NATL READER
[29]  
Requejo Ferran, 2011, POLITICAL LIBERALISM, P1
[30]  
Rokkan S., 1983, EC TERRITORY IDENTIT