Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic low anterior resection with DST anastomosis

被引:175
作者
Kawada, Kenji [1 ]
Hasegawa, Suguru [1 ]
Hida, Koya [1 ]
Hirai, Kenjiro [1 ]
Okoshi, Kae [2 ]
Nomura, Akinari [3 ]
Kawamura, Junichiro [4 ]
Nagayama, Satoshi [5 ]
Sakai, Yoshiharu [1 ]
机构
[1] Kyoto Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Surg, Sakyo Ku, Kyoto 6068507, Japan
[2] Japan Baptist Hosp, Dept Surg, Kyoto, Japan
[3] Saga Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Surg, Saga 840, Japan
[4] Shiga Med Ctr Adults, Dept Surg, Moriyama, Japan
[5] Japanese Fdn Canc Res, Canc Inst Hosp, Dept Surg Gastroenterol, Gastroenterol Ctr, Tokyo, Japan
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2014年 / 28卷 / 10期
关键词
Rectal cancer; Anastomotic leakage; Double-stapling technique; Laparoscopic low anterior resection; TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION; RECTAL-CANCER SURGERY; DOUBLE-STAPLING TECHNIQUE; MULTICENTER ANALYSIS; DEFUNCTIONING STOMA; COLORECTAL-SURGERY; TRIAL; METAANALYSIS; TRANSECTION; DRAINAGE;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-014-3564-0
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Laparoscopic rectal surgery involving rectal transection and anastomosis with stapling devices is technically difficult. The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk factors for anastomotic leakage (AL) after laparoscopic low anterior resection (LAR) with double-stapling technique (DST) anastomosis. Methods This was a retrospective single-institution study of 154 rectal cancer patients who underwent laparoscopic LAR with DST anastomosis between June 2005 and August 2013. Patient-, tumor-, and surgery-related variables were examined by univariate and multivariate analyses. The outcome of interest was clinical AL. Results The overall AL rate was 12.3 % (19/154). In univariate analysis, tumor size (P = 0.001), operative time (P = 0.049), intraoperative bleeding (P = 0.037), lateral lymph node dissection (P = 0.009), multiple firings of the linear stapler (P = 0.041), and precompression before stapler firings (P = 0.008) were significantly associated with AL. Multivariate analysis identified tumor size (odds ratio [OR] 4.01; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.25-12.89; P = 0.02) and precompression before stapler firings (OR 4.58; CI 1.22-17.20; P = 0.024) as independent risk factors for AL. In particular, precompression before stapler firing tended to reduce the AL occurring in early postoperative period. Conclusions Using appropriate techniques, laparoscopic LAR with DST anastomosis can be performed safely without increasing the risk of AL. Important risk factors for AL were tumor size and precompression before stapler firings.
引用
收藏
页码:2988 / 2995
页数:8
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Incidence of and risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic anterior resection with intracorporeal rectal transection and double-stapling technique anastomosis for rectal cancer [J].
Akiyoshi, Takashi ;
Ueno, Masashi ;
Fukunaga, Yosuke ;
Nagayama, Satoshi ;
Fujimoto, Yoshiya ;
Konishi, Tsuyoshi ;
Kuroyanagi, Hiroya ;
Yamaguchi, Toshiharu .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2011, 202 (03) :259-264
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, JAP CLASS COL CARC
[3]   Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: A meta-analysis [J].
Aziz, O ;
Constantinides, V ;
Tekkis, PP ;
Athanasiou, T ;
Purkayastha, S ;
Paraskeva, P ;
Darzi, AW ;
Heriot, AG .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 13 (03) :413-424
[4]   Prognosis after anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery [J].
Branagan, G ;
Finnis, D .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2005, 48 (05) :1021-1026
[5]   Transanal stent in anterior resection does not prevent anastomotic leakage [J].
Bülow, S ;
Bulut, O ;
Christensen, IJ ;
Harling, H .
COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2006, 8 (06) :494-496
[6]   Multicentre analysis of oncological and survival outcomes following anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery [J].
den Dulk, M. ;
Marijnen, C. A. M. ;
Collette, L. ;
Putter, H. ;
Pahlman, L. ;
Folkesson, J. ;
Bosset, J. -F. ;
Roedel, C. ;
Bujko, K. ;
van de Velde, C. J. H. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2009, 96 (09) :1066-1075
[7]   Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection for rectal cancer [J].
Eberl, Thomas ;
Jagoditsch, Michaei ;
Klingler, Anton ;
Tschmelitsch, Joerg .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2008, 196 (04) :592-598
[8]  
Enker WE, 1999, ANN SURG, V230, P544, DOI 10.1097/00000658-199910000-00010
[9]   Anastomotic leakage following routine mesorectal excision for rectal cancer in a national cohort of patients [J].
Eriksen, MT ;
Wibe, A ;
Norstein, J ;
Haffner, J ;
Wiig, JN .
COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2005, 7 (01) :51-57
[10]   Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial [J].
Guillou, PJ ;
Quirke, P ;
Thorpe, H ;
Walker, J ;
Jayne, DG ;
Smith, AMH ;
Heath, RM ;
Brown, JM .
LANCET, 2005, 365 (9472) :1718-1726