Towards sustainability of marine governance: Challenges and enablers for stakeholder integration in transboundary marine spatial planning in the Baltic Sea

被引:60
作者
Morf, Andrea [1 ,2 ]
Moodie, John [2 ]
Gee, Kira [3 ]
Giacometti, Alberto [2 ]
Kull, Michael [2 ]
Piwowarczyk, Joanna [4 ]
Schiele, Kerstin [5 ]
Zaucha, Jacek [6 ]
Kellecioglu, Ilhan [2 ]
Luttmann, Anne [5 ]
Strand, Helena [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gothenburg, Swedish Inst Marine Environm, Box 260, SE-40530 Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Nordregio, Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Helmholtz Zentrwn Mat & Kustenforsch GmbH, Geesthacht, Germany
[4] Polish Acad Sci, Inst Oceanol, Sopot, Poland
[5] Leibniz Inst Balt Sea Res Warnemunde, Leibniz, Germany
[6] Maritime Inst Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
Marine/maritime spatial planning; Stakeholder; Participation; Integration; Transboundary; PARTICIPATION; ENGAGEMENT; LADDER; POWER;
D O I
10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.04.009
中图分类号
P7 [海洋学];
学科分类号
0707 ;
摘要
Integrating stakeholder knowledge, views and needs in marine or maritime spatial planning (MSP) processes is important from a governance and social sustainability perspective both for MSP practitioners and for the evolving field of MSP research. Transboundary MSP appears particularly challenging for participation, which is why it is important to identify opportunities and address obstacles for stakeholder integration in this specific context. This article examines how stakeholder integration is currently practiced in the Baltic Sea Region (BSR), an enclosed sea where policy coherence and addressing conflicting interests across borders are especially relevant. It synthesises a range of challenges and enablers for stakeholder participation and mobilisation that have emerged from two transboundary MSP research and development projects, BaltSpace and Baltic SCOPE. The article finds that with the exception of statutory authorities, stakeholder engagement in the BSR is mostly limited to self-motivated stakeholders and consultation rather than more inclusive forms of participation. This can reduce the quality and legitimacy of MSP processes and risks to concentrate power in the hands of a small group of actors. For transboundary stakeholder integration to become more interactive and effective, five types of challenges need attention, regarding a) timing, b) governance systems, c) capacity and processes, d) stakeholder characteristics and e) knowledge and language. These obstacles can be addressed by (1) a dedicated research and development agenda that critically reflects on integrative tools and processes, and (2) by encouraging transnational institutions in the BSR to devote more resources to transboundary stakeholder integration and adopt flexible and adaptive strategies and tools that can facilitate stakeholder involvement throughout the MSP policy cycle.
引用
收藏
页码:200 / 212
页数:13
相关论文
共 79 条
[1]  
Aarhus Convention, 1998, UNECE CONV ACC INF
[2]  
Allmendinger P., 2001, PLANNING POSTMODERN
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2008, PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
[4]  
[Anonymous], PAN BALTIC CASE STUD
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2016, BONUS BALTSPACE DELI
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2005, POWER RADICAL VIEW O
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2017, COHERENT CROSS BORDE
[8]   LADDER OF CITIZEN PARTICIPATION [J].
ARNSTEIN, SR .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF PLANNERS, 1969, 35 (04) :216-224
[9]  
Baltic SCOPE, 2017, REC MAR SPAT PLANN B
[10]   Public governance: balancing stakeholder power in a network society [J].
Bovaird, T .
INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES, 2005, 71 (02) :217-228