Experimental Seismic Response of a Full-Scale Cold-Formed Steel-Framed Building. I: System-Level Response

被引:55
|
作者
Peterman, Kara D. [1 ,2 ]
Stehman, Matthew J. J. [2 ,3 ]
Madsen, Rob L. [4 ]
Buonopane, Stephen G. [5 ]
Nakata, Narutoshi [6 ]
Schafer, Benjamin W. [7 ]
机构
[1] Northeastern Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
[3] Environm Engn SpaceX, 1 Rocket Rd, Hawthorne, CA 90250 USA
[4] Devco Engn, 245 NE Conifer Blvd, Corvallis, OR 97330 USA
[5] Bucknell Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Lewisburg, PA 17837 USA
[6] Clarkson Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Potsdam, NY 13699 USA
[7] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
关键词
Metal and composite structures; Cold-formed steel; Light-framed construction; Shake table testing; PERFORMANCE; CONNECTIONS; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001577
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The objective of this paper is to provide details of the design and response of a full-scale cold-formed steel (CFS)-framed building that was tested under a series of dynamic excitations during different phases of construction. The seismic response of complete buildings framed from CFS is essentially unexplored, although significant work on the behavior of CFS members and subsystems, particularly shear walls has been conducted. The experiments described herein are the first tests of a CFS-framed building designed to North American seismic standards. Seismic testing was conducted using the twin shake tables at the University at Buffalo through the U.S. National Science Foundation Network for Earthquake Engineering Simulation program. The project was conducted in two phases. In the first phase, the building specimen was constructed and tested with only the structural components in place: CFS shear walls sheathed with oriented strand board (OSB), CFS gravity walls (unsheathed), and CFS-framed floor and roof diaphragms sheathed with OSB. Nondestructive testing and design basis earthquake-level testing were performed in this phase. In the second phase, a second building specimen was constructed, to identical specifications as in the first phase. However, the second building specimen was finished with nonstructural components including exterior sheathing of the perimeter gravity walls, gypsum-board sheathing of the interior of the perimeter gravity and shear walls, interior partition walls, ceilings, staircases, and exterior weatherproofing. Nondestructive testing was conducted at construction milestones, and the finished second-phase specimen was destructively tested at the maximum considered earthquake level. This paper presents the fundamental system-level response of these building specimens: period, percent damping, drift, and accelerations. The companion paper details component-level response. Overall, the work demonstrates the excellent performance of these structures under seismic excitation, while highlighting that this performance is related to the full system-level response and not just the designated elements in the lateral-force-resisting system.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Modeling seismic response of a full-scale cold-formed steel-framed building
    Leng, Jiazhen
    Peterman, Kara D.
    Bian, Guanbo
    Buonopane, Stephen G.
    Schafer, Benjamin W.
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2017, 153 : 146 - 165
  • [2] Earthquake and Postearthquake Fire Testing of a Midrise Cold-Formed Steel-Framed Building. I: Building Response and Physical Damage
    Hutchinson, Tara C.
    Wang, Xiang
    Hegemier, Gilbert
    Kamath, Praveen
    Meacham, Brian
    JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2021, 147 (09)
  • [3] Blast Testing of a Cold-Formed Steel-Framed Building with a Roof Truss System: I. Design, Characterization of Blast Pressures, and System-Level Response
    Weggel, David C.
    Whelan, Matthew J.
    Moss, Jonathan
    Rahman, Nabil
    Khalil, Ahmed
    JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2025, 151 (02)
  • [4] Seismic Performance of Cold-Formed Steel Wall Systems in a Full-Scale Building
    Wang, X.
    Pantoli, E.
    Hutchinson, T. C.
    Restrepo, J. I.
    Wood, R. L.
    Hoehler, M. S.
    Grzesik, P.
    Sesma, F. H.
    JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2015, 141 (10)
  • [5] Blast Testing of a Cold-Formed Steel-Framed Building with a Roof Truss System: II. Component-Level Response
    Whelan, Matthew J.
    Weggel, David C.
    Moss, Jonathan
    Rahman, Nabil
    Khalil, Ahmed
    JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2025, 151 (02)
  • [6] Seismic Response and Engineering of Cold-formed Steel Framed Buildings
    Schafer, B. W.
    Ayhan, D.
    Leng, J.
    Liu, P.
    Padilla-Llano, D.
    Peterman, K. D.
    Stehman, M.
    Buonopane, S. G.
    Eatherton, M.
    Madsen, R.
    Manley, B.
    Moen, C. D.
    Nakata, N.
    Rogers, C.
    Yu, C.
    STRUCTURES, 2016, 8 : 197 - 212
  • [7] Seismic Design Strength of Cold-Formed Steel-Framed Shear Walls
    Serrette, Reynaud
    JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 2010, 136 (09): : 1123 - 1130
  • [8] Behavior and performance of cold-formed steel-framed houses under seismic action
    Dubina, Dan
    JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIONAL STEEL RESEARCH, 2008, 64 (7-8) : 896 - 913
  • [9] Practice-oriented numerical model for seismic response of cold-formed steel-framed mid-rise buildings
    Singh, Amanpreet
    Zhang, Zhidong
    Wang, Xiang
    Schafer, Benjamin W.
    Hutchinson, Tara C.
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2024, 319
  • [10] Experimental fragility analysis of cold-formed steel-framed partition wall systems
    Jenkins, Craig
    Soroushian, Siavash
    Rahmanishamsi, Esmaeel
    Maragakis, E. Manos
    THIN-WALLED STRUCTURES, 2016, 103 : 115 - 127