When Women Run, Voters Will Follow (Sometimes): Examining the Mobilizing Effect of Female Candidates in the 2014 and 2018 Midterm Elections

被引:3
作者
Safarpour, Alauna C. [1 ,4 ]
Gaynor, SoRelle Wyckoff [2 ]
Rouse, Stella M. [2 ]
Swers, Michele L. [3 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[2] Univ Maryland, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[3] Georgetown Univ, Washington, DC USA
[4] Northwestern Univ, Evanston, IL USA
关键词
Female candidates; Gendered electoral context; Midterm elections; Mobilization; Voter turnout; Young voters; Voter files; IMPACT; GENDER; REPRESENTATION; STEREOTYPES; POLITICS; THREAT; MODELS; GAP; US;
D O I
10.1007/s11109-021-09767-x
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
In this paper, we examine whether women candidates are more likely to spur turnout in election years when gender-related issues are central to the national debate. We argue that having women on the ballot in a gendered electoral environment mobilizes specific groups of voters. Utilizing voter files in Pennsylvania and Washington for 2014 and the more gender focused 2018 election, we evaluate this potential mobilizing effect in both primary and general midterm elections. Our results show that both female and male voters were more likely to turn out in the 2018 midterm elections when a woman was on the ballot for the U.S. House of Representatives. In Pennsylvania, which tracks registrants' party affiliation, Democrats, members of third parties, and independents were particularly impacted by the presence of a female candidate. Moreover, in both states, a woman on the ballot was especially important for young people, a group that is traditionally less engaged. Utilizing a difference-in-difference approach, we confirm these results are not due to the endogenous selection of where women choose to run. These findings demonstrate that the mobilizing effect of women candidates is dependent on political context.
引用
收藏
页码:365 / 388
页数:24
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Pew Research Center
[2]   The more things change the more they stay the same - Examining gender differences in political attitude expression, 1952-2000 [J].
Atkeson, LR ;
Rapoport, RB .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 2003, 67 (04) :495-521
[3]   Not all cues are created equal: The conditional impact of female candidates on political engagement [J].
Atkeson, LR .
JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 2003, 65 (04) :1040-1061
[4]  
Bauer NM, 2020, QUALIFICATIONS GAP: WHY WOMEN MUST BE BETTER THAN MEN TO WIN POLITICAL OFFICE, P1, DOI 10.1017/9781108864503
[5]   Unnatural experiments? Estimating the incidence of endogenous policies [J].
Besley, T ;
Case, A .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2000, 110 (467) :F672-F694
[6]   RACE, SOCIOPOLITICAL PARTICIPATION, AND BLACK EMPOWERMENT [J].
BOBO, L ;
GILLIAM, FD .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 1990, 84 (02) :377-393
[7]   Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analyses [J].
Brambor, T ;
Clark, WR ;
Golder, M .
POLITICAL ANALYSIS, 2006, 14 (01) :63-82
[8]   Do female politicians empower women to vote or run for office? A regression discontinuity approach [J].
Broockman, David E. .
ELECTORAL STUDIES, 2014, 34 :190-204
[9]  
Brunner J., 2018, SEATTLE TIMES 1017
[10]   The Power of the State: How Postcards from the State Increased Registration and Turnout in Pennsylvania [J].
Bryant, Lisa A. ;
Hanmer, Michael J. ;
Safarpour, Alauna C. ;
McDonald, Jared .
POLITICAL BEHAVIOR, 2022, 44 (02) :535-549