Exploring socioeconomic inequities in access to palliative and end-of-life care in the UK: a narrative synthesis

被引:15
作者
French, Maddy [1 ]
Keegan, Thomas [2 ]
Anestis, Eleftherios [1 ]
Preston, Nancy [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lancaster, Div Hlth Res, Lancaster, England
[2] Univ Lancaster, Lancaster Med Sch, Lancaster, England
关键词
Socioeconomic position; Healthcare utilisation; Access to healthcare; Palliative care; End-of-life care; ILL CANCER-PATIENTS; GENERAL-PRACTITIONERS; SOCIAL-CLASS; HEALTH; EQUITY; SERVICES; HOSPICE; INTERVENTIONS; EXPERIENCES; COMMUNITY;
D O I
10.1186/s12904-021-00878-0
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Efforts inequities in access to palliative and end-of-life care require comprehensive understanding about the extent of and reasons for inequities. Most research on this topic examines differences in receipt of care. There is a need, particularly in the UK, for theoretically driven research that considers both receipt of care and the wider factors influencing the relationship between socioeconomic position and access to palliative and end-of-life care. Methods This is a mixed studies narrative synthesis on socioeconomic position and access to palliative and end-of-life care in the UK. Study searches were conducted in databases AMED, Medline, Embase, CINAHL, SocIndex, and Academic Literature Search, as well as grey literature sources, in July 2020. The candidacy model of access, which describes access as a seven-stage negotiation between patients and providers, guided study searches and provided a theoretical lens through which data were synthesised. Results Searches retrieved 5303 studies (after de-duplication), 29 of which were included. The synthesis generated four overarching themes, within which concepts of candidacy were evident: identifying needs; taking action; local conditions; and receiving care. Conclusion There is not a consistent or clear narrative regarding the relationship between socioeconomic position and receipt of palliative and end-of-life care in the UK. Attempts to address any inequities in access will require knowledge and action across many different areas. Key evidence gaps in the UK literature concern the relationship between socioeconomic position, organisational context, and assessing need for care.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 78 条
[21]   Socioeconomic position and use of healthcare in the last year of life: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Davies, Joanna M. ;
Sleeman, Katherine E. ;
Leniz, Javiera ;
Wilson, Rebecca ;
Higginson, Irene J. ;
Verne, Julia ;
Maddocks, Matthew ;
Murtagh, Fliss E. M. .
PLOS MEDICINE, 2019, 16 (04)
[22]  
Dixon J., 2015, EQUITY PROVISION PAL
[23]   Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups [J].
Dixon-Woods M. ;
Cavers D. ;
Agarwal S. ;
Annandale E. ;
Arthur A. ;
Harvey J. ;
Hsu R. ;
Katbamna S. ;
Olsen R. ;
Smith L. ;
Riley R. ;
Sutton A.J. .
BMC Medical Research Methodology, 6 (1)
[24]   How many people will need palliative care in 2040? Past trends, future projections and implications for services [J].
Etkind, S. N. ;
Bone, A. E. ;
Gomes, B. ;
Lovell, N. ;
Evans, C. J. ;
Higginson, I. J. ;
Murtagh, F. E. M. .
BMC MEDICINE, 2017, 15
[25]   Assessing and improving out-of-hours palliative care in a deprived community: a rapid appraisal study [J].
Fergus, C. J. Y. ;
Chinn, D. J. ;
Murray, S. A. .
PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2010, 24 (05) :493-500
[26]   Out-of-hours primary care use at the end of life: a descriptive study [J].
Fisher, Rebecca F. R. ;
Lasserson, Daniel ;
Hayward, Gail .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2016, 66 (650) :E654-E660
[27]   Factors supporting good partnership working between generalist and specialist palliative care services: a systematic review [J].
Gardiner, Clare ;
Gott, Merryn ;
Ingleton, Christine .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2012, 62 (598) :e353-e362
[28]   Variation in geographic access to specialist inpatient hospices in England and Wales [J].
Gatrell, Anthony C. ;
Wood, D. Justin .
HEALTH & PLACE, 2012, 18 (04) :832-840
[29]   Heterogeneity and changes in preferences for dying at home: a systematic review [J].
Gomes, Barbara ;
Calanzani, Natalia ;
Gysels, Marjolein ;
Hall, Sue ;
Higginson, Irene J. .
BMC PALLIATIVE CARE, 2013, 12
[30]  
Graham H., 2007, Unequal Lives: Health and Socioeconomic Inequalities