Efficacy of preoperative combined 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography for assessing primary rectal cancer response to neoadjuvant therapy - Discussion

被引:69
作者
Dayton, M.
机构
[1] Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD 21287
[2] Department of Nuclear Medicine, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
关键词
FDG-PET/CT; Neoadjuvant therapy; Rectal cancer;
D O I
10.1007/s11605-007-0170-7
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Efficacy of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) for determining neoadjuvant therapy response in rectal cancer is not well established. We sought to evaluate serial FDG-PET/CT for assessing tumor down-staging, percentage residual tumor, and complete response or microscopic disease with rectal cancer neoadjuvant therapy. Patients with rectal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant therapy, definitive surgical resection, and FDG-PET/CT before and 4-6 weeks after neoadjuvant treatment were included. Tumors were evaluated pretreatment and on final pathology for size and stage. FDG-PET/CT parameters assessed were visual response score (VRS), standardized uptake value (SUV), PET-derived tumor volume (PETvol), CT-derived tumor volume (CTvol), and total lesion glycolysis (δTLG). Twenty-one rectal cancer patients over 3 years underwent neoadjuvant treatment, serial FDG-PET/CT, and resection. Complete response or microscopic disease (n∈=∈7, 33%) was associated with higher ΔCTvol (AUC∈=∈0.82, p∈=∈0.004) and ΔSUV (AUC∈=∈0. 79, p∈=∈0.01). Tumor down-staging (n∈=∈14, 67%) was associated with greater ΔPETvol (AUC∈=∈0.82, p∈<∈0.001) and ΔSUV (AUC∈=∈0.82, p∈<∈0.001). Pathologic lymph node disease (n∈=∈7, 33%) correlated with ΔCTvol (AUC∈=∈0.75, p∈=∈0.03) and ΔPETvol (AUC∈=∈0.70, p∈=∈0.08). FDG-PET/CT parameters were best for assessing tumor down-staging and percentage of residual tumor after neoadjuvant treatment of rectal cancer and can potentially assist in treatment planning. © 2007 The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract.
引用
收藏
页码:969 / 969
页数:1
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Response prediction by FDG-PET after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy and combined regional hyperthermia of rectal cancer:: correlation with endorectal ultrasound and histopathology [J].
Amthauer, H ;
Denecke, T ;
Rau, B ;
Hildebrandt, B ;
Hünerbein, M ;
Ruf, J ;
Schneider, U ;
Gutberlet, M ;
Schlag, PM ;
Felix, R ;
Wust, P .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2004, 31 (06) :811-819
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2002, AJCC CANC STAG MAN
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1997, Nonparametric methods for quantitative analysis
[4]  
Antoch G, 2004, J NUCL MED, V45, P357
[5]   A phase I-II study of weekly oxaliplatin, 5-fiuorouracil continuous infusion and preoperative radiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer [J].
Aschele, C ;
Friso, ML ;
Pucciarelli, S ;
Lonardi, S ;
Sartor, L ;
Fabris, G ;
Urso, EDL ;
Del Bianco, P ;
Sotti, G ;
Lise, M ;
Monfardini, S .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2005, 16 (07) :1140-1146
[6]  
Brücher BLDM, 2001, ANN SURG, V233, P300
[7]   18F-FDG positron emission tomography staging and restaging in rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiation [J].
Calvo, FA ;
Domper, M ;
Matute, R ;
Martínez-Lázaro, R ;
Arranz, JA ;
Desco, M ;
Alvarez, E ;
Carreras, JL .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2004, 58 (02) :528-535
[8]  
Camilleri-Brennan J., 2002, Colorectal Dis, V4, P61, DOI 10.1046/j.1463-1318.2002.00300.x
[9]   Restaging after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal adenocarcinoma: role of F18-FDG PET [J].
Capirci, C ;
Rubello, D ;
Chierichetti, F ;
Crepaldi, G ;
Carpi, A ;
Nicolini, A ;
Mandoliti, G ;
Polico, C .
BIOMEDICINE & PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2004, 58 (08) :451-457
[10]   The accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography with fine-needle aspiration, integrated positron emission tomography with computed tomography, and computed tomography in restaging patients with esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy [J].
Cerfolio, RJ ;
Bryant, AS ;
Ohja, B ;
Bartolucci, AA ;
Eloubeidi, MA .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2005, 129 (06) :1232-1241