Machine Learning for Risk and Resilience Assessment in Structural Engineering: Progress and Future Trends

被引:93
作者
Wang, Xiaowei [1 ]
Mazumder, Ram K. [2 ]
Salarieh, Babak [3 ]
Salman, Abdullahi M. [3 ]
Shafieezadeh, Abdollah [4 ]
Li, Yue [5 ]
机构
[1] Tongji Univ, Dept Bridge Engn, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Kansas, Dept Civil Environm & Architectural Engn, Lawrence, KS 66045 USA
[3] Univ Alabama, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Huntsville, AL 35899 USA
[4] Ohio State Univ, Dept Civil Environm & Geodet Engn, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[5] Case Western Reserve Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Engn, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Machine learning (ML); Artificial intelligence; Risk; Resilience; Structural engineering; Buildings; Bridges; Pipelines; Electric power systems; PIPELINE INTEGRITY MANAGEMENT; CYBER-PHYSICAL SYSTEMS; FRAGILITY ANALYSIS; SHEAR-STRENGTH; CASCADING FAILURES; STATISTICAL-MODELS; EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE; SUPPORTED BRIDGES; NEURAL-NETWORKS; POWER OUTAGES;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0003392
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Population growth, economic development, and rapid urbanization in many areas have led to increased exposure and vulnerability of structural and infrastructure systems to hazards. Thus, developing risk-based assessment and management tools is crucial for stakeholders and the general public to make informed decisions on prehazard planning and posthazard recovery. To this end, structural risk and resilience assessment has been an ongoing research topic in the past 20 years. Recently, machine learning (ML) techniques have been shown as promising tools for advancing the risk and resilience assessment of structure and infrastructure systems. To date, however, there is a lack of a holistic review on ML progress across various branches of structural engineering; an in-depth analysis of literature that can provide a timely evaluation of risk and resilience assessment methods of the built environment, where different types of structural and infrastructure facilities are interconnected. For this reason, this study conducted a comprehensive review on ML for risk and resilience assessment in four main branches of structural engineering (buildings, bridges, pipelines, and electric power systems). To cover the crucial modules in the prevailing risk and resilience assessment frameworks, existing literature is thoroughly examined and characterized in terms of six attributes of ML, including method, task type, data source, analysis scale, event type, and topic area. Moreover, limitations and challenges are identified, and future research needs are highlighted to move forward the frontiers of ML for structural risk and resilience assessment.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 262 条
  • [21] Practical Resilience Metrics for Planning, Design, and Decision Making
    Ayyub, Bilal M.
    [J]. ASCE-ASME JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY IN ENGINEERING SYSTEMS PART A-CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2015, 1 (03):
  • [22] Comparison of statistical and machine learning approaches to modeling earthquake damage to water pipelines
    Bagriacik, Adam
    Davidson, Rachel A.
    Hughes, Matthew W.
    Bradley, Brendon A.
    Cubrinovski, Misko
    [J]. SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2018, 112 : 76 - 88
  • [23] Parameterized fragility models for multi-bridge classes subjected to hurricane loads
    Balomenos, Georgios P.
    Kameshwar, Sabarethinam
    Padgett, Jamie E.
    [J]. ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2020, 208
  • [24] Multihazard resilience of highway bridges and bridge networks: a review
    Banerjee, Swagata
    Vishwanath, B. Sharanbaswa
    Devendiran, Dinesh Kumar
    [J]. STRUCTURE AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING, 2019, 15 (12) : 1694 - 1714
  • [25] Performance-Based Hurricane Engineering (PBHE) framework
    Barbato, Michele
    Petrini, Francesco
    Unnikrishnan, Vipin U.
    Ciampoli, Marcello
    [J]. STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2013, 45 : 24 - 35
  • [26] Convergent Agency: Encouraging Transdisciplinary Approaches for Effective Climate Change Adaptation and Disaster Risk Reduction
    Bendito, America
    Barrios, Edmundo
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK SCIENCE, 2016, 7 (04) : 430 - 435
  • [27] Berry M., 2004, PEER STRUCTURAL PERF
  • [28] Biringer B., 2013, CRC PRESS, DOI [10.1201/b14566, DOI 10.1201/B14566]
  • [29] MULTI-FACTOR EXPERIMENTAL-DESIGNS FOR EXPLORING RESPONSE SURFACES
    BOX, GEP
    HUNTER, JS
    [J]. ANNALS OF MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS, 1957, 28 (01): : 195 - 241
  • [30] Bramer M., 2013, PRINCIPLES DATA MINI, P121, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-1-4471-7493-6_9, DOI 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.10.019]