Machine Learning for Risk and Resilience Assessment in Structural Engineering: Progress and Future Trends

被引:93
作者
Wang, Xiaowei [1 ]
Mazumder, Ram K. [2 ]
Salarieh, Babak [3 ]
Salman, Abdullahi M. [3 ]
Shafieezadeh, Abdollah [4 ]
Li, Yue [5 ]
机构
[1] Tongji Univ, Dept Bridge Engn, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Kansas, Dept Civil Environm & Architectural Engn, Lawrence, KS 66045 USA
[3] Univ Alabama, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Huntsville, AL 35899 USA
[4] Ohio State Univ, Dept Civil Environm & Geodet Engn, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[5] Case Western Reserve Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Engn, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Machine learning (ML); Artificial intelligence; Risk; Resilience; Structural engineering; Buildings; Bridges; Pipelines; Electric power systems; PIPELINE INTEGRITY MANAGEMENT; CYBER-PHYSICAL SYSTEMS; FRAGILITY ANALYSIS; SHEAR-STRENGTH; CASCADING FAILURES; STATISTICAL-MODELS; EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE; SUPPORTED BRIDGES; NEURAL-NETWORKS; POWER OUTAGES;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0003392
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Population growth, economic development, and rapid urbanization in many areas have led to increased exposure and vulnerability of structural and infrastructure systems to hazards. Thus, developing risk-based assessment and management tools is crucial for stakeholders and the general public to make informed decisions on prehazard planning and posthazard recovery. To this end, structural risk and resilience assessment has been an ongoing research topic in the past 20 years. Recently, machine learning (ML) techniques have been shown as promising tools for advancing the risk and resilience assessment of structure and infrastructure systems. To date, however, there is a lack of a holistic review on ML progress across various branches of structural engineering; an in-depth analysis of literature that can provide a timely evaluation of risk and resilience assessment methods of the built environment, where different types of structural and infrastructure facilities are interconnected. For this reason, this study conducted a comprehensive review on ML for risk and resilience assessment in four main branches of structural engineering (buildings, bridges, pipelines, and electric power systems). To cover the crucial modules in the prevailing risk and resilience assessment frameworks, existing literature is thoroughly examined and characterized in terms of six attributes of ML, including method, task type, data source, analysis scale, event type, and topic area. Moreover, limitations and challenges are identified, and future research needs are highlighted to move forward the frontiers of ML for structural risk and resilience assessment.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 262 条
  • [1] Solar-powered, wireless smart camera network: An IoT solution for outdoor video monitoring
    Abas, Kevin
    Obraczka, Katia
    Miller, Leland
    [J]. COMPUTER COMMUNICATIONS, 2018, 118 : 217 - 233
  • [2] Administration F.H., 1995, Recording and coding guide for the structure inventory and appraisal of the nation's bridges
  • [3] Toward life-cycle reliability-, risk- and resilience-based design and assessment of bridges and bridge networks under independent and interacting hazards: emphasis on earthquake, tsunami and corrosion
    Akiyama, Mitsuyoshi
    Frangopol, Dan M.
    Ishibashi, Hiroki
    [J]. STRUCTURE AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING, 2020, 16 (01) : 26 - 50
  • [4] Machine-Learning Methods for Earthquake Ground Motion Analysis and Simulation
    Alimoradi, Arzhang
    Beck, James L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MECHANICS, 2015, 141 (04)
  • [5] BACKPROPAGATION AND STOCHASTIC GRADIENT DESCENT METHOD
    AMARI, S
    [J]. NEUROCOMPUTING, 1993, 5 (4-5) : 185 - 196
  • [6] NGA-West2 Database
    Ancheta, Timothy D.
    Darragh, Robert B.
    Stewart, Jonathan P.
    Seyhan, Emel
    Silva, Walter J.
    Chiou, Brian S. -J.
    Wooddell, Katie E.
    Graves, Robert W.
    Kottke, Albert R.
    Boore, David M.
    Kishida, Tadahiro
    Donahue, Jennifer L.
    [J]. EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2014, 30 (03) : 989 - 1005
  • [7] Managing engineering systems with large state and action spaces through deep reinforcement learning
    Andriotis, C. P.
    Papakonstantinou, K. G.
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2019, 191
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2017, Climate Science Special Report: Fourth National Climate Assessment
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2018, INT J ENG TRENDS TEC, DOI DOI 10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V59P225
  • [10] [Anonymous], 2016, KDD16 P 22 ACM, DOI DOI 10.1145/2939672.2939785