Performance following ability-focused physical therapy intervention in individuals with severely limited physical and cognitive abilities

被引:14
作者
Brown, DA
Effgen, SK
Palisano, RJ
机构
[1] Univ New England, Dept Phys Therapy, Biddeford, ME 04005 USA
[2] Allegheny Univ Hlth Sci, Pediat Phys Therapy Program, Philadelphia, PA 19102 USA
[3] Allegheny Univ Hlth Sci, Program Movement Sci, Philadelphia, PA 19102 USA
[4] McMaster Univ, Neurodev Clin Res Unit, Hamilton, ON, Canada
来源
PHYSICAL THERAPY | 1998年 / 78卷 / 09期
关键词
ability-focused physical therapy; generalization; goal attainment scaling; motor learning; severe physical and cognitive disability; transfer;
D O I
10.1093/ptj/78.9.934
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Purpose. Do individuals with severely limited physical and cognitive abilities improve their gross motor abilities when given physical therapy intervention, and does improvement transfer to nontreatment settings? Subjects. The subjects were 24 individuals (10 female, 14 female), aged 3 to 30 years ((X) over bar = 20.1, SD = 8.1), who were nonambulatory and had limited adaptive behavior. Methods. Change in gross motor ability during 18 weeks of twice-weekly therapy was measured using goal attainment scaling (GAS). Three gross motor goals were developed for each subject based on individual or caregiver needs, with one goal randomly selected as a control. Physical impairments were treated, and behavioral management principles, low-level communication approaches, high-repetition practice of goals, and a progressive reduction of both physical assistance and multisensory cues were used. An independent rater scored goal level from randomly ordered videotapes recorded during therapy and in recess and home settings. Results. Mean GAS T scores were higher for treatment goals ((X) over bar = 45.6, SD = 10.5) compared with control goals ((X) over bar = 34.6, SD = 11.8). When the expected goal level (50) was met during therapy, mean GAS T scores in recess settings ((X) over bar = 42.2, SD = 12.2) were lower. At the conclusion of therapy, there were no differences in goal levels between treatment and control in both the recess and home settings. Conclusion and Discussion. The subjects demonstrated improvement of gross motor abilities practiced during therapy. Level of ability during therapy, however, did not consistently transfer to the recess and home settings.
引用
收藏
页码:934 / 947
页数:14
相关论文
共 62 条
  • [1] ADLER SS, 1993, PNF PRACTICE
  • [2] Alberto P. S., 1979, TEACHING EXCEPTIONAL, V12, P16, DOI [10.1177/004005997901200105, DOI 10.1177/004005997901200105]
  • [3] ALBERTO PA, 1986, APPL BEHAV ANAL TEAC, P220
  • [4] [Anonymous], STROKE REHABILITATIO
  • [5] [Anonymous], MOVEMENT SCI FDN PHY
  • [6] [Anonymous], GEN MAINTENANCE LIFE
  • [7] AYERS J, 1972, SENSORY INTEGRATION, P120
  • [8] THE NEGATIVE EFFECTS OF POSITIVE REINFORCEMENT IN TEACHING-CHILDREN WITH DEVELOPMENTAL DELAY
    BIEDERMAN, GB
    DAVEY, VA
    RYDER, C
    FRANCHI, D
    [J]. EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN, 1994, 60 (05) : 458 - 465
  • [9] BILLINGSLEY FF, 1988, GEN STUDENTS SEVERE, P73
  • [10] Bishop B, 1975, Phys Ther, V55, P139