Systematic review and meta-analysis of tick-borne disease risk factors in residential yards, neighborhoods, and beyond

被引:40
作者
Fischhoff, Ilya R. [1 ]
Bowden, Sarah E. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Keesing, Felicia [4 ]
Ostfeld, Richard S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cary Inst Ecosyst Studies, 2801 Sharon Turnpike, Millbrook, NY 12545 USA
[2] Eagle Med Serv LLC, 2835 Brandywine Rd,Suite 200, Atlanta, GA 30341 USA
[3] Ctr Dis Control, Div Global Migrat & Quarantine, 1600 Clifton Rd, Atlanta, GA 30329 USA
[4] Bard Coll, POB 5000, Annandale on Hudson, NY 12504 USA
关键词
Peri-domestic; Ixodes scapularis; Lyme disease; Babesiosis; Anaplasmosis; Tick bites; Spatial scale; LYME-DISEASE; UNITED-STATES; LANDSCAPE; EXPOSURE; COUNTY; SURVEILLANCE; ENVIRONMENT; PREVENTION; BABESIOSIS; BEHAVIORS;
D O I
10.1186/s12879-019-4484-3
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Background Exposure to blacklegged ticks Ixodes scapularis that transmit pathogens is thought to occur peri-domestically. However, the locations where people most frequently encounter infected ticks are not well characterized, leading to mixed messages from public health officials about where risk is highest. Methods We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on spatial risk factors for tick-borne disease and tick bites in eastern North America. We examined three scales: the residential yard, the neighborhood surrounding (but not including) the yard, and outside the neighborhood. Nineteen eligible studies represented 2741 cases of tick-borne illness and 1447 tick bites. Using random effects models, we derived pooled odds ratio (OR) estimates. Results The meta-analysis revealed significant disease risk factors at the scale of the yard (OR 2.60 95% CI 1.96 - 3.46), the neighborhood (OR 4.08 95% CI 2.49 - 6.68), and outside the neighborhood (OR 2.03 95% CI 1.59 - 2.59). Although significant risk exists at each scale, neighborhood scale risk factors best explained disease exposure. Analysis of variance revealed risk at the neighborhood scale was 57% greater than risk at the yard scale and 101% greater than risk outside the neighborhood. Conclusions This analysis emphasizes the importance of understanding and reducing tick-borne disease risk at the neighborhood scale. Risk-reducing interventions applied at each scale could be effective, but interventions applied at the neighborhood scale are most likely to protect human health.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Prevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi in Ixodidae Tick around Asia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Ji, Zhenhua
    Jian, Miaomiao
    Yue, Peng
    Cao, Wenjing
    Xu, Xin
    Zhang, Yu
    Pan, Yingyi
    Yang, Jiaru
    Chen, Jingjing
    Liu, Meixiao
    Fan, Yuxin
    Su, Xuan
    Wen, Shiyuan
    Kong, Jing
    Li, Bingxue
    Dong, Yan
    Zhou, Guozhong
    Liu, Aihua
    Bao, Fukai
    [J]. PATHOGENS, 2022, 11 (02):
  • [32] Systematic review and meta-analysis of church-based interventions to improve cardiovascular disease risk factors
    Maroney, Kieran
    Laurent, Jodie
    Alvarado, Flor
    Gabor, Alexandra
    Bell, Caryn
    Ferdinand, Keith
    He, Jiang
    Mills, Katherine T.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2023, 366 (03) : 199 - 208
  • [33] Are interventions to increase the uptake of screening for cardiovascular disease risk factors effective? A systematic review and meta-analysis
    AT Cheong
    SM Liew
    EM Khoo
    NF Mohd Zaidi
    K Chinna
    [J]. BMC Family Practice, 18
  • [34] Birth prevalence and risk factors of neural tube defects in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tesfay, Neamin
    Hailu, Girmay
    Habtetsion, Medhanye
    Woldeyohannes, Fistum
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (11):
  • [35] Are interventions to increase the uptake of screening for cardiovascular disease risk factors effective? A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Cheong, A. T.
    Liew, S. M.
    Khoo, E. M.
    Zaidi, N. F. Mohd
    Chinna, K.
    [J]. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE, 2017, 18
  • [36] Occupational Noise and Hypertension Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Bolm-Audorff, Ulrich
    Hegewald, Janice
    Pretzsch, Anna
    Freiberg, Alice
    Nienhaus, Albert
    Seidler, Andreas
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (17) : 1 - 24
  • [37] Health outcomes in redlined versus non-redlined neighborhoods: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Donley, Gwendolyn
    Ciesielski, Timothy H. H.
    Gill, India
    Yamoah, Owusua
    Roche, Abigail
    Martinez, Roberto
    Freedman, Darcy A. A.
    Lee, Eun Kyung
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2022, 294
  • [38] Risk factors for sporadic Yersinia enterocolitica infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Guillier, Laurent
    Fravalo, Philippe
    Leclercq, Alexandre
    Thebault, Anne
    Kooh, Pauline
    Cadavez, Vasco
    Gonzales-Barron, Ursula
    [J]. MICROBIAL RISK ANALYSIS, 2021, 17
  • [39] Identification of risk factors for falls in postmenopausal women: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhao, J.
    Liang, G.
    Huang, H.
    Zeng, L.
    Yang, W.
    Pan, J.
    Liu, J.
    [J]. OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 31 (10) : 1895 - 1904
  • [40] Incidence and risk factors for colorectal cancer in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tazinkeng, Nkengeh N.
    Pearlstein, Ethan F.
    Manda-Mapalo, Martha
    Adekunle, Ayooluwatomiwa D.
    Monteiro, Joao Filipe G.
    Sawyer, Kelsey
    Egboh, Stella-Maris C.
    Bains, Kanwal
    Chukwudike, Evaristus S.
    Mohamed, Mouhand F.
    Asante, Comfort
    Ssempiira, Julius
    Asombang, Akwi W.
    [J]. BMC GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2024, 24 (01)