Randomized controlled trial of virtual reality and hybrid simulation for robotic surgical training

被引:24
作者
Feifer, Andrew [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Al-Ammari, Adel [2 ,3 ]
Kovac, Evan [2 ,3 ]
Delisle, Josee [2 ,3 ]
Carrier, Serge [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Anidjar, Maurice [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Urol Surg, New York, NY 10065 USA
[2] McGill Univ, Dept Surg, Div Urol, Ctr Hlth, Montreal, PQ H3A 2T5, Canada
[3] McGill Univ, Ctr Hlth, Bernstein Ctr Minimally Invas Surg, Montreal, PQ H3A 2T5, Canada
[4] Sir Mortimer B Davis Jewish Hosp, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
robotics; laparoscopy; computer simulation; clinical competence; LAPAROSCOPIC SKILLS; OUTCOMES; SURGERY; PROSTATECTOMY; PSYCHOMOTOR; PERFORMANCE; VALIDATION; VALIDITY; SYSTEM; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.10060.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE To evaluate if two commonly used laparoscopic simulators could be adapted and used successfully for the robotics platform in a laparoscopic and roboticnaive medical student population. MATERIALS AND METHODS We identified two widely validated laparoscopic simulation programs, LapSim (R) (Surgical Science Sweden AB), and ProMIS (R) (Haptica, Ireland) for inclusion in the study. The McGill Inanimate System for Training and Evaluation of Laparoscopic Skills (R) task set was used for ProMIS, and adapted for the DaVinci (R) console (Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA) robotic platform. We then randomized 20 naive medical students to receive training on either LapSimor ProMIS, both or neither, and evaluated them beforeand aftertraining. RESULTS When the groups were compared at baseline, there were no statistical differences in mean scores amongst the groups in univariate analysis (alpha = 0.05). Whencomparing mean scores within groups before and after training sessions, statistically significant performance enhancement in all four robotic tasks were identified in the groups receiving dual training. CONCLUSION We have shownthat the use of ProMIS hybrid and LapSimvirtual reality (VR) simulators in conjunction with each other can considerable improve robotic console performance in novice medical students compared with hybrid and VR simulation alone.
引用
收藏
页码:1652 / 1656
页数:5
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Virtual reality-assisted robotic surgery simulation [J].
Albani, Justin M. ;
Lee, David I. .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2007, 21 (03) :285-287
[2]   Robotic prostatectomy: A review of outcomes compared with laparoscopic and open approaches [J].
Berryhill, Roy, Jr. ;
Jhaveri, Jay ;
Yadav, Rajiv ;
Leung, Robert ;
Rao, Sandhya ;
El-Hakim, Assaad ;
Tewari, Ashutosh .
UROLOGY, 2008, 72 (01) :15-23
[3]   Critical appraisal of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy [J].
Brandina, Ricardo ;
Berger, Andre ;
Kamoi, Kazumi ;
Gill, Inderbir S. .
CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2009, 19 (03) :290-296
[4]   Do hybrid simulator-generated metrics correlate with content-valid outcome measures? [J].
Cesanek, Paul ;
Uchal, Miroslav ;
Uranues, Selman ;
Patruno, Joseph ;
Gogal, Christina ;
Kimmel, Sharon ;
Bergamaschi, Roberto .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2008, 22 (10) :2178-2183
[5]   Validity of the MISTELS simulator for laparoscopy training in urology [J].
Dauster, B ;
Steinberg, AP ;
Vassiliou, MC ;
Bergman, S ;
Stanbridge, DD ;
Feldman, LS ;
Fried, GM .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2005, 19 (05) :541-545
[6]   Robotic surgery and resident training [J].
De Ugarte, DA ;
Etzioni, DA ;
Gracia, C ;
Atkinson, JB .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2003, 17 (06) :960-963
[7]  
Donias HW, 2002, AM SURGEON, V68, P177
[8]   Oncologic and functional outcomes after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy [J].
Drouin, S. -J. ;
Vaessen, C. ;
Misrai, V. ;
Ferhi, K. ;
Bitker, M. -O. ;
Chartier-Kastler, E. ;
Haertig, A. ;
Richard, F. ;
Roupret, M. .
PROGRES EN UROLOGIE, 2009, 19 (03) :158-164
[9]   Survey of residency training in laparoscopic and robotic surgery [J].
Duchene, David A. ;
Moinzadeh, Alireza ;
Gill, Inderbir S. ;
Clayman, Ralph V. ;
Winfield, Howard N. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 176 (05) :2158-2166
[10]   Construct validity for the LAPSIM laparoscopic surgical simulator [J].
Duffy, AJ ;
Hogle, NJ ;
McCarthy, H ;
Lew, JI ;
Egan, A ;
Christos, P ;
Fowler, DL .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2005, 19 (03) :401-405