The acoustic realization of contrastive focus by 6-year-old Australian English-speaking children

被引:1
作者
Yuen, Ivan [1 ]
Rattanasone, Nan Xu [1 ]
Schmidt, Elaine [2 ]
Holt, Rebecca [1 ]
Demuth, Katherine [1 ]
机构
[1] Macquarie Univ, Dept Linguist, C5A,Balaclava Rd, N Ryde, NSW 2109, Australia
[2] Univ Cambridge, Cambridge Assessment, Cambridge, England
关键词
PITCH ACCENT; STRESS; ACQUISITION; INTONATION; INFORMATION; PROMINENCE; INTENSITY; DURATION; PATTERNS; PROSODY;
D O I
10.1121/10.0016387
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Children as young as five have some ability to produce contrastive focus [Wells et al. (2004) J. Child Lang. 31, 749-778]. However, adult listeners' ability to identify the location of contrastive focus depends on whether the speech came from a 4-, 7-, or 11-year-old [Patel and Brayton (2009) J. Speech. Lang. Hear. Res. 52, 790-801]. Recent acoustic studies have also reported the use of F-0 vs duration in contrastive focus productions by American English-speaking 2-year-olds [Thorson and Morgan (2021) J. Child Lang. 48, 541-568] and 4-year-olds [Wonnacott and Watson (2008) Cognition 107, 1093-1101], respectively. This study, therefore, evaluated the extent to which older 6-year-olds, with more language experience, used F-0 and/or duration when producing contrastive focus, and compared this to adult speech. Monosyllabic and disyllabic adjective + noun targets (e.g., green ball) in utterance medial and final position were elicited from 20 Australian English-speaking 6-year-olds and 14 adults in adjective focus and noun focus conditions. Although both adults and children used high F-0, only adults consistently used word and stressed syllable duration as well. This suggests that children may master the different acoustic cues to contrastive focus at different stages of development, with late cue integration. (C) 2022 Acoustical Society of America.
引用
收藏
页码:3313 / 3322
页数:10
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   USE OF CONTRASTIVE STRESS IN NORMAL, APHASIC, AND AUTISTIC-CHILDREN [J].
BALTAXE, CAM .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING RESEARCH, 1984, 27 (01) :97-105
[2]   Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 [J].
Bates, Douglas ;
Maechler, Martin ;
Bolker, Benjamin M. ;
Walker, Steven C. .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE, 2015, 67 (01) :1-48
[3]  
Boersma P., 2014, Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (version 6.0. 18)
[4]   Acoustic correlates of information structure [J].
Breen, Mara ;
Fedorenko, Evelina ;
Wagner, Michael ;
Gibson, Edward .
LANGUAGE AND COGNITIVE PROCESSES, 2010, 25 (7-9) :1044-1098
[5]  
Chen A., 2009, Phonetics and phonology: Interactions and interrelations, P91
[6]  
Chen A., 2018, The Development of Prosody in First Language Acquisition, P295, DOI DOI 10.1075/TILAR.23.15CHE
[7]   Prosody in context: a review [J].
Cole, Jennifer .
LANGUAGE COGNITION AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2015, 30 (1-2) :1-31
[8]   ACOUSTICAL ASPECTS OF CONTRASTIVE STRESS IN QUESTION ANSWER CONTEXTS [J].
COOPER, WE ;
EADY, SJ ;
MUELLER, PR .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1985, 77 (06) :2142-2156
[9]   Patterns of accentual lengthening in English four-syllable words [J].
Dimitrova, Snezhina ;
Turk, Alice .
JOURNAL OF PHONETICS, 2012, 40 (03) :403-418
[10]   SPEECH INTONATION AND FOCUS LOCATION IN MATCHED STATEMENTS AND QUESTIONS [J].
EADY, SJ ;
COOPER, WE .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1986, 80 (02) :402-415