Reinforcement Rate and the Balance Between Excitatory and Inhibitory Learning: Insights From Deletion of the GluA1 AMPA Receptor Subunit

被引:3
作者
Austen, Joseph M. [1 ]
Sprengel, Rolf [1 ]
Sanderson, David J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Durham, Dept Psychol, South Rd, Durham DH1 3LE, England
基金
英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会;
关键词
pavlovian conditioning; mice; conditioned inhibition; summation test; prediction error; INTERTRIAL DURATIONS; SPATIAL MEMORY; TRIAL; TIME; NUMBER; TERM;
D O I
10.1037/xan0000336
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Conditioned responding is sensitive to reinforcement rate. This rate-sensitivity is impaired in genetically modified mice that lack the GluA1 subunit of the AMPA receptor. A time-dependent application of the Rescorla-Wagner learning rule can be used to derive an account of rate-sensitivity by reflecting the balance of excitatory and inhibitory associative strength over time. By applying this analysis, the impairment in GluA1 knockout mice may be explained by reduced sensitivity to negative prediction error and thus, impaired inhibitory learning, such that excitatory associative strength is not reduced during the nonreinforced periods of a conditioned stimulus. The article describes a test of the role of GluA1 in inhibitory learning that requires summing of the associative strengths of cues presented in compound. Mice were trained on a feature negative discrimination of the form Athorn/AX-. GluA1 knockout mice acquired the discrimination to a similar extent as controls. The inhibitory properties of cue X were verified in a summation test that included a control for nonassociative, external inhibition. The performance of GluA1 knockout mice was similar to that of controls. However, in line with previous findings, GluA1 deletion impaired the precision of timing of conditioned responding. These results provide further evidence that impaired sensitivity to reinforcement rate is not a consequence of impaired inhibitory learning. The results may more readily fit with accounts of rate sensitivity that propose that it reflects encoding of temporal and numeric information rather than being a consequence of changes in associative strength over time.
引用
收藏
页码:307 / 314
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Dissociating Representations of Time and Number in Reinforcement-Rate Learning by Deletion of the GluA1 AMPA Receptor Subunit in Mice [J].
Austen, Joseph M. ;
Pickering, Corran ;
Sprengel, Rolf ;
Sanderson, David J. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 32 (02) :204-217
[2]   Some appetitive procedures for examining associative learning in the mouse: Implications for psychopathology [J].
Bonardi, Charlotte ;
Bartle, Craig ;
Bowles, Kathryn ;
de Pulford, Felicity ;
Jennings, Domhnall J. .
BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2010, 211 (02) :240-247
[3]   Extinction of Pavlovian conditioning: The influence of trial number and reinforcement history [J].
Chan, C. K. J. ;
Harris, Justin A. .
BEHAVIOURAL PROCESSES, 2017, 141 :19-25
[4]   An evaluation of conditioned inhibition as defined by Rescorla's two-test strategy [J].
Cole, RP ;
Barnet, RC ;
Miller, RR .
LEARNING AND MOTIVATION, 1997, 28 (03) :323-341
[5]   Time, rate, and conditioning [J].
Gallistel, CR ;
Gibbon, J .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2000, 107 (02) :289-344
[6]   TRIAL AND INTERTRIAL DURATIONS IN AUTOSHAPING [J].
GIBBON, J ;
BALDOCK, MD ;
LOCURTO, C ;
GOLD, L ;
TERRACE, HS .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-ANIMAL BEHAVIOR PROCESSES, 1977, 3 (03) :264-284
[7]   The Importance of Trials [J].
Harris, Justin A. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-ANIMAL LEARNING AND COGNITION, 2019, 45 (04) :390-404
[8]   Time, Trials, and Extinction [J].
Harris, Justin A. ;
Andrew, Benjamin J. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-ANIMAL LEARNING AND COGNITION, 2017, 43 (01) :15-29
[9]   Pavlovian Conditioning and Cumulative Reinforcement Rate [J].
Harris, Justin A. ;
Patterson, Angela E. ;
Gharaei, Saba .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-ANIMAL LEARNING AND COGNITION, 2015, 41 (02) :137-151
[10]   Response Rate and Reinforcement Rate in Pavlovian Conditioning [J].
Harris, Justin A. ;
Carpenter, Joanne S. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-ANIMAL BEHAVIORAL PROCESSES, 2011, 37 (04) :375-384