Ancillary services markets in europe: Evolution and regulatory trade-offs

被引:66
作者
Rancilio, G. [1 ]
Rossi, A. [1 ,2 ]
Falabretti, D. [1 ]
Galliani, A. [2 ]
Merlo, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Politecn Milan, Dept Energy, Piazza Leonardo Da Vinci 32, I-20133 Milan, Italy
[2] Autorita Regolaz Energia Reti & Ambiente ARERA, Piazza Cavour 5, I-20121 Milan, Italy
关键词
Balancing markets; Balancing product; BSP; Ancillary services; Frequency regulation; Fast reserve; Trade-offs; Dispatch; NRA; Regulatory barriers; Distributed energy resources; Bid size; Asymmetric; Aggregation; DISTRIBUTED ENERGY-RESOURCES; ELECTRICITY MARKET; BALANCING MARKET; FLEXIBILITY; INTEGRATION; BARRIERS; SYSTEMS; GENERATION; PROVISION; RESERVES;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2021.111850
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The generating power mix has deeply changed in the last years. Especially in Europe, the electric systems are evolving towards a more decentralized architecture, widely penetrated by renewable and distributed energy resources. These resources usually present less predictability and fast dynamics. To avoid jeopardizing the power system, they should be effectively included in the Ancillary Services Markets (ASMs), which procure the resources for balancing and safely dispatching the system. This work presents a meta-analysis of the evolution of ASMs and the underlying regulatory trade-offs. The evolutions are analyzed modularly to clearly investigate the benefit of each one. The analysis aims to provide an evaluation of each trend regarding the architecture, the services, and the products of the ASMs, based on the level of agreement of the two main counterparties: the system operator who manages the system and the Balancing Services Provider that delivers the service. The outcome is a ranking of the possible regulatory evolutions, with the win-win situations at the top and the cases that imply drawbacks for a counterparty at the bottom. The ranking can represent a guideline for regulatory authorities as well as market operators or players to realize effective market arrangements. Finally, a survey of European countries describes the effort of each one towards each evolution.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 99 条
[21]   Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories [J].
Clune, Stephen ;
Crossin, Enda ;
Verghese, Karli .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 140 :766-783
[22]  
Consentec, 2014, DESCR LOAD FREQ CONT
[23]   Impact of harmonised common balancing capacity procurement in selected Central European electricity balancing markets [J].
Dallinger, Bettina ;
Auer, Hans ;
Lettner, Georg .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2018, 222 :351-368
[24]   Sizing and allocation of frequency restoration reserves for LFC Block cooperation [J].
de Haan, J. E. S. ;
Gibescu, M. ;
Klaar, D. A. M. ;
Kling, W. L. .
ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2015, 128 :60-65
[25]   Dynamic dimensioning approach for operating reserves: Proof of concept in Belgium [J].
De Vos, K. ;
Stevens, N. ;
Devolder, O. ;
Papavasiliou, A. ;
Hebb, B. ;
Matthys-Donnadieu, J. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2019, 124 :272-285
[26]   Negative Wholesale Electricity Prices in the German, French and Belgian Day-Ahead, Intra-Day and Real-Time Markets [J].
De Vos, Kristof .
Electricity Journal, 2015, 28 (04) :36-50
[27]  
dena, 2014, DEN ANC SERV STUD 20
[28]   Managing electric flexibility from Distributed Energy Resources: A review of incentives for market design [J].
Eid, Cherrelle ;
Codani, Paul ;
Perez, Yannick ;
Reneses, Javier ;
Hakvoort, Ruth .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2016, 64 :237-247
[29]  
El Chami N, 2020, ENERGY STORAGE NEWS
[30]  
Elering, 2017, DEM RESP AGGR HARM A