Ancillary services markets in europe: Evolution and regulatory trade-offs

被引:66
作者
Rancilio, G. [1 ]
Rossi, A. [1 ,2 ]
Falabretti, D. [1 ]
Galliani, A. [2 ]
Merlo, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Politecn Milan, Dept Energy, Piazza Leonardo Da Vinci 32, I-20133 Milan, Italy
[2] Autorita Regolaz Energia Reti & Ambiente ARERA, Piazza Cavour 5, I-20121 Milan, Italy
关键词
Balancing markets; Balancing product; BSP; Ancillary services; Frequency regulation; Fast reserve; Trade-offs; Dispatch; NRA; Regulatory barriers; Distributed energy resources; Bid size; Asymmetric; Aggregation; DISTRIBUTED ENERGY-RESOURCES; ELECTRICITY MARKET; BALANCING MARKET; FLEXIBILITY; INTEGRATION; BARRIERS; SYSTEMS; GENERATION; PROVISION; RESERVES;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2021.111850
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The generating power mix has deeply changed in the last years. Especially in Europe, the electric systems are evolving towards a more decentralized architecture, widely penetrated by renewable and distributed energy resources. These resources usually present less predictability and fast dynamics. To avoid jeopardizing the power system, they should be effectively included in the Ancillary Services Markets (ASMs), which procure the resources for balancing and safely dispatching the system. This work presents a meta-analysis of the evolution of ASMs and the underlying regulatory trade-offs. The evolutions are analyzed modularly to clearly investigate the benefit of each one. The analysis aims to provide an evaluation of each trend regarding the architecture, the services, and the products of the ASMs, based on the level of agreement of the two main counterparties: the system operator who manages the system and the Balancing Services Provider that delivers the service. The outcome is a ranking of the possible regulatory evolutions, with the win-win situations at the top and the cases that imply drawbacks for a counterparty at the bottom. The ranking can represent a guideline for regulatory authorities as well as market operators or players to realize effective market arrangements. Finally, a survey of European countries describes the effort of each one towards each evolution.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 99 条
[1]  
Ackermann T, 2002, IEEE/PES TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION CONFERENCE AND EXHIBITION 2002: ASIA PACIFIC, VOLS 1-3, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, P1357, DOI 10.1109/TDC.2002.1177677
[2]  
Ahlqvist V, 2019, CENTRAL VERSUS SELF
[3]   Integrating distributed generation: Regulation and trends in three leading countries [J].
Anaya, Karim L. ;
Pollitt, Michael G. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2015, 85 :475-486
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Energy storage in PJM: Exploring frequency regulation market transformation
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2017, System Needs and Product Strategy 2017
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2016, 2016 13 INT C EUR EN, DOI DOI 10.1109/EEM.2016.7521271
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1997, Socioecon. Plann. Sci, DOI [10.1016/S0038-0121(96)00034-1, DOI 10.1016/S0038-0121(96)00034-1]
[8]  
ARERA, 2020, REL 320 2020 I EEL
[9]   Critical evaluation of European balancing markets to enable the participation of Demand Aggregators [J].
Barbero, Mattia ;
Corchero, Cristina ;
Canals Casals, Lluc ;
Igualada, Lucia ;
Heredia, F-Javier .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2020, 264 (264)
[10]  
Baritaud M, 2012, SECURING POWER TRANS, DOI [10.1787/5k3wb8fmsz6h-en, DOI 10.1787/5K3WB8FMSZ6H-EN]