Can we differentiate histologic subtypes of neuroendocrine tumour liver metastases at a single phase contrast-enhanced CT-correlation with Ga-68 DOTATATE PET/CT findings

Objective: To assess the usefulness of a single-phase contrast-enhanced CT to differentiate subtypes of neuroendocrine tumour (NET) liver metastases and to evaluate the correlation between CT features and Ga-68 DOTATATE positron emission tomography/CT (PET/CT) findings. Methods: Between December 2017 and April 2019 patients with liver metastases of neuroendocrine tumours who underwent CT and Ga-68 DOTATATE PET/CT were enrolled in the study. All patients involved in the study had undergone a standardised single-phase contrast-enhanced CT. Whole body PET/CT images were obtained with a combined PET/CT scanner. All CT images were retrospectively analysed by two radiologists. Enhancement patterns of lesions were assessed. For quantitative examination; CT attenuation values of metastatic lesions, liver parenchyma and aorta were measured using a freehand ROI and tumour-to-liver ratio [T-L = (Tumour-Liver)/Liver] and tumour-to-aorta ratio [T-A = (Tumour-Aorta)/Aorta] were calculated. The lesion with the highest Ga-68 DOTATATE uptake in the liver was used for calculations. The metabolic tumour volume (MTV), maximum standardised uptake value (SUVmax) and SUVmean were calculated for the target liver lesion. Results: A total of 137 NET liver metastases divided into in three groups: 49 (35.7%) pancreatic, 60 (44.5%) gastroenteric and 26 (18.9%) lung NET liver metastases were analysed. Gastroenteric NET metastases often showed heterogeneous enhancement which was significantly higher than in the pancreas and lung NET liver metastases (p < 0.001). 96.72% (n = 59) of the gastroenteric NET liver metastases were hypoattenuating whereas the most frequent presentation for the pancreatic group was hyperattenuation (63.26%,n = 31). The difference in enhancement patterns of the liver metastases was statistically significant (p < 0.001) with respect to the location of the primary tumour. For quantitative analysis; tumour CT values were significantly different between the groups (p < 0.001). The T-L ratio was statistically different between gastroenteric and pancreatic NET liver metastases and pancreatic and lung NET groups (p < 0.001). The T-A ratio was significantly higher in the pancreatic NET metastases (p < 0.001). SUVmax, SUVmean and MTV values, however, were not significantly different between the subgroups. There was a weak positive correlation between T-L ratio and SUV me values. Conclusion: We noticed statistically significant differences in both qualitative and quantitative CT features between histologic subgroups of neuroendocrine tumour liver metastases at a single phase contrast-enhanced CT. Advances in knowledge: Our study will be the first in the literature which extensively focus on assessing the CT features of liver metastases of NETs at a single phase CT and Ga-68DOTATATE PET/CT. As the different histological subtypes of NET liver metastases exhibit different clinical outcomes, these features might help to identify the primary tumour to provide optimal treatment.