Risk of Metastasis in Men with Grade Group 2 Prostate Cancer Managed with Active Surveillance at a Tertiary Cancer Center

被引:37
作者
Carlsson, Sigrid [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Benfante, Nicole [1 ]
Alvim, Ricardo [1 ]
Sjoberg, Daniel D. [2 ]
Vickers, Andrew [2 ]
Reuter, Victor E. [3 ]
Fine, Samson W. [3 ]
Vargas, Hebert Alberto [4 ]
Wiseman, Michal [1 ]
Mamoor, Maha [1 ]
Ehdaie, Behfar [1 ]
Laudone, Vincent [1 ]
Scardino, Peter [1 ]
Eastham, James [1 ]
Touijer, Karim [1 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, Urol Serv, 353 East 68th St, New York, NY 10065 USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10021 USA
[3] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Pathol, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10021 USA
[4] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Radiol, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10021 USA
[5] Univ Gothenburg, Inst Clin Sci, Dept Urol, Sahlgrenska Acad, Gothenburg, Sweden
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
prostatic neoplasms; watchful waiting; neoplasm grading; TERM OUTCOMES; FOLLOW-UP; INTERMEDIATE; WORLDWIDE; COHORT;
D O I
10.1097/JU.0000000000000742
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: We studied the risk of metastatic prostate cancer development in men with Grade Group 2 disease managed with active surveillance at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Materials and Methods: A total of 219 men with Grade Group 2 prostate cancer had disease managed with active surveillance between 2000 and 2017. Biopsy was performed every 2 to 3 years, or upon changes in magnetic resonance imaging, prostate specific antigen level or digital rectal examination. The primary outcome was development of distant metastasis. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate treatment-free survival. Results: Median age at diagnosis was 67 years (IQR 61-72), median prostate specific antigen was 5 ng/ml (IQR 4-7) and most patients (69%) had nonpalpable disease. During followup 64 men received treatment, including radical prostatectomy in 36 (56%), radiotherapy in 20 (31%), hormone therapy in 3 (5%) and focal therapy in 5 (8%). Of the 36 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy 32 (89%) had Grade Group 2 disease on pathology and 4 (11%) had Grade Group 3 disease. Treatment-free survival was 61% (95% CI 52-70) at 5 years and 49% (95% CI 37-60) at 10 years. Three men experienced biochemical recurrence, no men had distant metastasis and no men died of prostate cancer during the followup. Median followup was 3.1 years (IQR 1.9-4.9). Conclusions: Active surveillance appears to be a safe initial management strategy in the short term for carefully selected and closely monitored men with Grade Group 2 prostate cancer treated at a tertiary cancer center. Definitive conclusions await further followup.
引用
收藏
页码:1117 / 1121
页数:5
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [11] Long-Term Follow-Up of a Large Active Surveillance Cohort of Patients With Prostate Cancer
    Klotz, Laurence
    Vesprini, Danny
    Sethukavalan, Perakaa
    Jethava, Vibhuti
    Zhang, Liying
    Jain, Suneil
    Yamamoto, Toshihiro
    Mamedov, Alexandre
    Loblaw, Andrew
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 33 (03) : 272 - U75
  • [12] Cribriform growth is highly predictive for postoperative metastasis and disease-specific death in Gleason score 7 prostate cancer
    Kweldam, Charlotte F.
    Wildhagen, Mark F.
    Steyerberg, Ewout W.
    Bangma, Chris H.
    van der Kwast, Theodorus H.
    van Leenders, Geert J. L. H.
    [J]. MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2015, 28 (03) : 457 - 464
  • [13] Active Surveillance for Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer: Survival Outcomes in the Sunnybrook Experience
    Musunuru, Hima Bindu
    Yamamoto, Toshihiro
    Klotz, Laurence
    Ghanem, Gabriella
    Mamedov, Alexandre
    Sethukavalan, Peraka
    Jethava, Vibhuti
    Jain, Suneil
    Zhang, Liying
    Vesprini, Danny
    Loblaw, Andrew
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 196 (06) : 1651 - 1657
  • [14] Intermediate-Term Outcomes for Men with Very Low/Low and Intermediate/High Risk Prostate Cancer Managed by Active Surveillance
    Nyame, Yaw A.
    Almassi, Nima
    Haywood, Samuel C.
    Greene, Daniel J.
    Ganesan, Vishnu
    Dai, Charles
    Zabell, Joseph
    Reichard, Chad
    Arora, Hans
    Zampini, Anna
    Crane, Alice
    Hettel, Daniel
    Elshafei, Ahmed
    Fareed, Khaled
    Stein, Robert J.
    Berglund, Ryan K.
    Gong, Michael
    Jones, J. Stephen
    Klein, Eric A.
    Stephenson, Andrew J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 198 (03) : 591 - 598
  • [15] Active surveillance for prostate cancer: current evidence and contemporary state of practice
    Tosoian, Jeffrey J.
    Carter, H. Ballentine
    Lepor, Abbey
    Loeb, Stacy
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS UROLOGY, 2016, 13 (04) : 205 - 215
  • [16] Intermediate and Longer-Term Outcomes From a Prospective Active-Surveillance Program for Favorable-Risk Prostate Cancer
    Tosoian, Jeffrey J.
    Mamawala, Mufaddal
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    Landis, Patricia
    Wolf, Sacha
    Trock, Bruce J.
    Carter, H. Ballentine
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 33 (30) : 3379 - +
  • [17] Historical and contemporary perspectives on cribriform morphology in prostate cancer
    Truong, Matthew
    Frye, Thomas
    Messing, Edward
    Miyamoto, Hiroshi
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS UROLOGY, 2018, 15 (08) : 475 - 482
  • [18] Extended Followup and Risk Factors for Disease Reclassification in a Large Active Surveillance Cohort for Localized Prostate Cancer
    Welty, Christopher J.
    Cowan, Janet E.
    Nguyen, Hao
    Shinohara, Katsuto
    Perez, Nannette
    Greene, Kirsten L.
    Chan, June M.
    Meng, Maxwell V.
    Simko, Jeffry P.
    Cooperberg, Matthew R.
    Carroll, Peter R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 193 (03) : 807 - 811
  • [19] Metastatic Prostate Cancer in Men Initially Treated with Active Surveillance
    Yamamoto, Toshihiro
    Musunuru, Bindu
    Vesprini, Danny
    Zhang, Liying
    Ghanem, Gabriella
    Loblaw, Andrew
    Klotz, Laurence
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 195 (05) : 1409 - 1414