Risk of Metastasis in Men with Grade Group 2 Prostate Cancer Managed with Active Surveillance at a Tertiary Cancer Center

被引:37
作者
Carlsson, Sigrid [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Benfante, Nicole [1 ]
Alvim, Ricardo [1 ]
Sjoberg, Daniel D. [2 ]
Vickers, Andrew [2 ]
Reuter, Victor E. [3 ]
Fine, Samson W. [3 ]
Vargas, Hebert Alberto [4 ]
Wiseman, Michal [1 ]
Mamoor, Maha [1 ]
Ehdaie, Behfar [1 ]
Laudone, Vincent [1 ]
Scardino, Peter [1 ]
Eastham, James [1 ]
Touijer, Karim [1 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, Urol Serv, 353 East 68th St, New York, NY 10065 USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10021 USA
[3] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Pathol, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10021 USA
[4] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Radiol, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10021 USA
[5] Univ Gothenburg, Inst Clin Sci, Dept Urol, Sahlgrenska Acad, Gothenburg, Sweden
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
prostatic neoplasms; watchful waiting; neoplasm grading; TERM OUTCOMES; FOLLOW-UP; INTERMEDIATE; WORLDWIDE; COHORT;
D O I
10.1097/JU.0000000000000742
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: We studied the risk of metastatic prostate cancer development in men with Grade Group 2 disease managed with active surveillance at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Materials and Methods: A total of 219 men with Grade Group 2 prostate cancer had disease managed with active surveillance between 2000 and 2017. Biopsy was performed every 2 to 3 years, or upon changes in magnetic resonance imaging, prostate specific antigen level or digital rectal examination. The primary outcome was development of distant metastasis. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate treatment-free survival. Results: Median age at diagnosis was 67 years (IQR 61-72), median prostate specific antigen was 5 ng/ml (IQR 4-7) and most patients (69%) had nonpalpable disease. During followup 64 men received treatment, including radical prostatectomy in 36 (56%), radiotherapy in 20 (31%), hormone therapy in 3 (5%) and focal therapy in 5 (8%). Of the 36 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy 32 (89%) had Grade Group 2 disease on pathology and 4 (11%) had Grade Group 3 disease. Treatment-free survival was 61% (95% CI 52-70) at 5 years and 49% (95% CI 37-60) at 10 years. Three men experienced biochemical recurrence, no men had distant metastasis and no men died of prostate cancer during the followup. Median followup was 3.1 years (IQR 1.9-4.9). Conclusions: Active surveillance appears to be a safe initial management strategy in the short term for carefully selected and closely monitored men with Grade Group 2 prostate cancer treated at a tertiary cancer center. Definitive conclusions await further followup.
引用
收藏
页码:1117 / 1121
页数:5
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] Active Surveillance for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Worldwide: The PRIAS Study
    Bul, Meelan
    Zhu, Xiaoye
    Valdagni, Riccardo
    Pickles, Tom
    Kakehi, Yoshiyuki
    Rannikko, Antti
    Bjartell, Anders
    van der Schoot, Deric K.
    Cornel, Erik B.
    Conti, Giario N.
    Boeve, Egbert R.
    Staerman, Frederic
    Vis-Maters, Jenneke J.
    Vergunst, Henk
    Jaspars, Joris J.
    Stroelin, Petra
    van Muilekom, Erik
    Schroder, Fritz H.
    Bangma, Chris H.
    Roobol, Monique J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2013, 63 (04) : 597 - 603
  • [2] Feasibility study: Watchful waiting for localized low to intermediate grade prostate carcinoma with selective delayed intervention based on prostate specific antigen, histological and/or clinical progression
    Choo, R
    Klotz, L
    Danjoux, C
    Morton, GC
    DeBoer, G
    Szumacher, E
    Fleshner, N
    Bunting, P
    Hruby, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 167 (04) : 1664 - 1669
  • [3] Active surveillance for intermediate-risk prostate cancer
    Dall'Era, M. A.
    Klotz, L.
    [J]. PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2017, 20 (01) : 1 - 6
  • [4] Clinical Usefulness of Total Length of Gleason Pattern 4 on Biopsy in Men with Grade Group 2 Prostate Cancer
    Dean, Lucas W.
    Assel, Melissa
    Sjoberg, Daniel D.
    Vickers, Andrew J.
    Al-Ahmadie, Hikmat A.
    Chen, Ying-Bei
    Gopalan, Anuradha
    Sirintrapun, S. Joseph
    Tickoo, Satish K.
    Eastham, James A.
    Scardino, Peter T.
    Reuter, Victor E.
    Ehdaie, Behfar
    Fine, Samson W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 201 (01) : 77 - 82
  • [5] A Contemporary Prostate Cancer Grading System: A Validated Alternative to the Gleason Score
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    Zelefsky, Michael J.
    Sjoberg, Daniel D.
    Nelson, Joel B.
    Egevad, Lars
    Magi-Galluzzi, Cristina
    Vickers, Andrew J.
    Parwani, Anil V.
    Reuter, Victor E.
    Fine, Samson W.
    Eastham, James A.
    Wiklund, Peter
    Han, Misop
    Reddy, Chandana A.
    Ciezki, Jay P.
    Nyberg, Tommy
    Klein, Eric A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 69 (03) : 428 - 435
  • [6] Magnetic resonance imaging in active surveillance-a modern approach
    Giganti, Francesco
    Moore, Caroline M.
    [J]. TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2018, 7 (01) : 116 - 131
  • [7] Multiparametric 3T MRI for the prediction of pathological downgrading after radical prostatectomy in patients with biopsy-proven Gleason score 3+4 prostate cancer
    Gondo, Tatsuo
    Hricak, Hedvig
    Sala, Evis
    Zheng, Junting
    Moskowitz, Chaya S.
    Bernstein, Melanie
    Eastham, James A.
    Vargas, Hebert Alberto
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2014, 24 (12) : 3161 - 3170
  • [8] Active surveillance for prostate cancer: a systematic review of contemporary worldwide practices
    Kinsella, Netty
    Helleman, Jozien
    Bruinsma, Sophie
    Carlsson, Sigrid
    Cahill, Declan
    Brown, Christian
    Van Hemelrijck, Mieke
    [J]. TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2018, 7 (01) : 83 - 97
  • [9] Active Surveillance for Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer
    Klotz, Laurence
    [J]. CURRENT UROLOGY REPORTS, 2017, 18 (10)
  • [10] Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer
    Klotz, Laurence
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2017, 27 (03) : 225 - 230