Natural History of Post-Treatment Kidney Stone Fragments: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:44
作者
Brain, Eleanor [1 ]
Geraghty, Robert M. [2 ,3 ]
Lovegrove, Catherine E. [4 ,5 ]
Yang, Bingyuan [4 ]
Somani, Bhaskar K. [6 ]
机构
[1] Newcastle Med Sch, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
[2] Freeman Rd Hosp, Dept Urol, Freeman Rd, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
[3] Newcastle Univ, Fac Med Sci, Int Ctr Life, Translat & Clin Res Inst, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
[4] Churchill Hosp, Dept Urol, Oxford, England
[5] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Surg, Oxford, England
[6] Univ Hosp Southampton, Dept Urol, Southampton, Hants, England
关键词
ureteroscopy; lithotripsy; nephrolithotomy; percutaneous; urolithiasis; treatment outcome; INSIGNIFICANT RESIDUAL FRAGMENTS; EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCKWAVE LITHOTRIPSY; TERM FOLLOW-UP; PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY; DISEASE; RISK; POPULATION; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1097/JU.0000000000001836
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: We assessed the literature around post-treatment asymptomatic residual stone fragments and performed a meta-analysis. The main outcomes were intervention rate and disease progression. Materials and Methods: We searched Ovid (R), MEDLINE (R), Embase (R), the Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrials.gov using search terms: "asymptomatic", "nephrolithiasis", "ESWL", "PCNL", "URS" and "intervention." Inclusion criteria were all studies with residual renal fragments following treatment (shock wave lithotripsy, ureteroscopy or percutaneous nephrolithotomy). Analysis was performed using 'metafor' in R and bias determined using Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Results: From 273 articles, 18 papers (2,096 patients) had details of intervention rate for residual fragments. Aggregate intervention rates for <= 4 mm fragments rose from 19% (20 months) to 22% (50 months), while >4 mm fragments rose from 22% to 47%. Aggregate disease progression rates for <= 4 mm rose from 25% to 47% and >4 mm rose from 26% to 88%. However, there was substantial difference in definition of "disease progression." Meta-analysis comparing >4 mm against <= 4 mm fragments: intervention rate for >4 mm (vs <= 4 mm): OR=1.50 (95% CI 0.70-2.30), p <0.001, I-2=67.6%, tau(2)=0.48, Cochran's Q=11.4 (p=0.02) and Egger's regression: z=3.11, p=0.002. Disease progression rate for >4 mm: OR=0.06 (95% CI -0.98-1.10), p=0.91, I-2=53.0%, tau(2)=0.57, Cochran's Q=7.11 (p=0.07) and Egger's regression: z=-0.75, p=0.45. Bias analysis demonstrated a moderate risk. Conclusions: Larger post-treatment residual fragments are significantly more likely to require further intervention especially in the long term. Smaller fragments, although less likely to require further intervention, still carry that risk. Notably, there is no significant difference in disease progression between fragment sizes. Patients with residual fragments should be appropriately counselled and informed decision-making regarding further management should be done.
引用
收藏
页码:527 / 536
页数:10
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] Clinically Insignificant Residual Fragments After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Medium-Term Follow-Up
    Altunrende, Fatih
    Tefekli, Ahmet
    Stein, Robert J.
    Autorino, Riccardo
    Yuruk, Emrah
    Laydner, Humberto
    Binbay, Murat
    Muslumanoglu, Ahmet Y.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2011, 25 (06) : 941 - 945
  • [2] Minor residual fragments after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy: Spontaneous clearance or risk factor for recurrent stone formation?
    Buchholz, NP
    MeierPadel, S
    Rutishauser, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 1997, 11 (04) : 227 - 232
  • [3] Natural history of residual renal stone fragments after ESWL
    Candau, C
    Saussine, C
    Lang, H
    Roy, C
    Faure, F
    Jacqmin, D
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2000, 37 (01) : 18 - 22
  • [4] Natural History, Complications and Re-Intervention Rates of Asymptomatic Residual Stone Fragments after Ureteroscopy: a Report from the EDGE Research Consortium
    Chew, Ben H.
    Brotherhood, Hilary L.
    Sur, Roger L.
    Wang, An Qi
    Knudsen, Bodo E.
    Yong, Courtney
    Marien, Tracy
    Miller, Nicole L.
    Krambeck, Amy E.
    Charchenko, Cameron
    Humphreys, Mitchell R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 195 (04) : 982 - 986
  • [5] Cribari-Neto F, 2010, J STAT SOFTW, V34, P1
  • [6] Predictors of clinical significance of residual fragments after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for renal stones
    El-Nahas, Ahmed R.
    El-Assmy, Ahmed M.
    Madbouly, Khaled
    Sheir, Khaled Z.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2006, 20 (11) : 870 - 874
  • [7] Complications, Re-Intervention Rates, and Natural History of Residual Stone Fragments After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
    Emmott, Anthony S.
    Brotherhood, Hilary L.
    Paterson, Ryan F.
    Lange, Dirk
    Chew, Ben H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2018, 32 (01) : 28 - 32
  • [8] Fate of Residual Stones After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Critical Analysis
    Ganpule, Arvind
    Desai, Mahesh
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2009, 23 (03) : 399 - 403
  • [9] Does chronic hyperglycaemia increase the risk of kidney stone disease? results from a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Geraghty, Robert
    Abdi, Abdihakim
    Somani, Bhaskar
    Cook, Paul
    Roderick, Paul
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (01):
  • [10] Regarding "Derivation and validation of genome-wide polygenic score for urinary tract stone diagnosis"
    Geraghty, Robert M.
    Wilson, Ian
    Sayer, John A.
    [J]. KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 98 (05) : 1347 - 1347