Histogram analysis from stretched exponential model on diffusion-weighted imaging: evaluation of clinically significant prostate cancer

被引:8
|
作者
Kim, EunJu [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Chan Kyo [3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Kim, Hyun Soo [7 ]
Jang, Dong Pyo [1 ]
Kim, In Young [1 ]
Hwang, Jinwoo [2 ]
机构
[1] Hanyang Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Philips Healthcare, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Samsung Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Sch Med, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Samsung Med Ctr, Ctr Imaging Sci, Sch Med, Seoul, South Korea
[5] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Dept Med Device Management & Res, SAIHST, Seoul, South Korea
[6] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Dept Digital Hlth, SAIHST, Seoul, South Korea
[7] Kyung Hee Univ, Grad Sch, Dept Med, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; MATHEMATICAL-MODELS; GLEASON SCORE; B-VALUES; MRI; DIFFERENTIATION; REPEATABILITY; DIAGNOSIS; MEN;
D O I
10.1259/bjr.20190757
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the usefulness of histogram analysis of stretched exponential model (SEM) on diffusion-weighted imaging in evaluating clinically significant prostate cancer (CSC). Methods: A total of 85 patients with prostate cancer underwent 3T multiparametric MRI, followed by radical prostatectomy. Histogram parameters of the tumor from the SEM [distributed diffusion coefficient (DDC) and alpha] and the monoexponential model [MEM; apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC)] were evaluated, The associations between parameters and Gleason score or Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System v. 2 were evaluated. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve was calculated to evaluate diagnostic performance of parameters in predicting CSC. Results: The values of histogram parameters of DDC and ADC were significantly lower in patients with CSC than in patients without CSC (p < 0.05), except for skewness and kurtosis. The value of the 25th percentile of alpha was significantly lower in patients with CSC than in patients without CSC (p = claw. Histogram parameters of ADC and DDC had significant weak to moderate negative associations with Gleason score or Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System v. 2 (p < 0.001), except for skewness and kurtosis. For predicting CSC, the area under the curves of mean ADC (0.856), 50th percentile DDC (0.852), and 25th percentile alpha (0.707) yielded the highest values compared to other histogram parameters from each group. Conclusion: Histogram analysis of the SEM on diffusion-weighted imaging may be a useful quantitative tool for evaluating CSC, However, the SEM did not outperform the MEM. Advances in knowledge: Histogram parameters of SEM may be useful for evaluating CSC.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of mono-exponential, bi-exponential, and stretched exponential diffusion-weighted MR imaging models in differentiating hepatic hemangiomas from liver metastases
    Fujimoto, Keita
    Noda, Yoshifumi
    Kawai, Nobuyuki
    Kajita, Kimihiro
    Akamine, Yuta
    Kawada, Hiroshi
    Hyodo, Fuminori
    Matsuo, Masayuki
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 141
  • [42] Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of Prostate Cancer: Correlation Between Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values and Tumor Proliferation
    Wang, Xi Zhen
    Wang, Bin
    Gao, Zhi Qin
    Liu, Jin Gang
    Liu, Zuo Qin
    Niu, Qing Liang
    Sun, Zhen Kui
    Yuan, Yu Xiao
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2009, 29 (06) : 1360 - 1366
  • [43] High and ultra-high b-value diffusion-weighted imaging in prostate cancer: a quantitative analysis
    Wetter, Axel
    Nensa, Felix
    Lipponer, Christine
    Guberina, Nika
    Olbricht, Tobias
    Schenck, Marcus
    Schlosser, Thomas W.
    Gratz, Marcel
    Lauenstein, Thomas C.
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2015, 56 (08) : 1009 - 1015
  • [44] Application of a stretched-exponential model for morphometric analysis of accelerated diffusion-weighted 129Xe MRI of the rat lung
    Ouriadov, Alexei, V
    Fox, Matthew S.
    Lindenmaier, Andras A.
    Stirrat, Elaine
    Serrai, Hacene
    Santyr, Giles
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE MATERIALS IN PHYSICS BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2021, 34 (01) : 73 - 84
  • [45] Comparison of Computed Diffusion-Weighted Imaging b2000 and Acquired Diffusion-Weighted Imaging b2000 for Detection of Prostate Cancer
    Kim, Yeon Jung
    Kim, Seung Ho
    Baek, Tae Wook
    Park, Hyungin
    Lim, Yun-jung
    Jung, Hyun Kyung
    Kim, Joo Yeon
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN SOCIETY OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 83 (05): : 1059 - 1070
  • [46] Combination of Diffusion-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Extended Prostate Biopsy Predicts Lobes Without Significant Cancer: Application in Patient Selection for Hemiablative Focal Therapy
    Matsuoka, Yoh
    Numaoa, Noboru
    Saito, Kazutaka
    Tanaka, Hiroshi
    Kumagai, Jiro
    Yoshida, Soichiro
    Koga, Fumitaka
    Masuda, Hitoshi
    Kawakami, Satoru
    Fujii, Yasuhisa
    Kihara, Kazunori
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2014, 65 (01) : 186 - 192
  • [47] Monoexponential, Biexponential, and stretched-exponential models using diffusion-weighted imaging: A quantitative differentiation of breast lesions at 3.0T
    Jin, Ya-Nan
    Zhang, Yan
    Cheng, Jing-Liang
    Zheng, Dan-Dan
    Hu, Ying
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2019, 50 (05) : 1461 - 1467
  • [48] Diffusion-weighted imaging in the assessment of prostate cancer: Comparison of zoomed imaging and conventional technique
    Brendle, Cornelia
    Martirosian, Petros
    Schwenzer, Nina F.
    Kaufmann, Sascha
    Kruck, Stephan
    Kramer, Ulrich
    Notohamiprodjo, Mike
    Nikolaou, Konstantin
    Schraml, Christina
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2016, 85 (05) : 893 - 900
  • [49] Role of Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Evaluation of Clinically Suspected Cholesteatoma Cases
    Ayyaril, Nazreen Abbass
    Jayasankaran, Sandya Chirukandath
    Menon, Unnikrishnan
    Moorthy, Srikanth
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2022, 74 (SUPPL 1) : 719 - 723
  • [50] Quantitative Evaluation of Computed High b Value Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate
    Maas, Marnix C.
    Futterer, Jurgen J.
    Scheenen, Tom W. J.
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2013, 48 (11) : 779 - 786