Histogram analysis from stretched exponential model on diffusion-weighted imaging: evaluation of clinically significant prostate cancer

被引:8
|
作者
Kim, EunJu [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Chan Kyo [3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Kim, Hyun Soo [7 ]
Jang, Dong Pyo [1 ]
Kim, In Young [1 ]
Hwang, Jinwoo [2 ]
机构
[1] Hanyang Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Philips Healthcare, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Samsung Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Sch Med, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Samsung Med Ctr, Ctr Imaging Sci, Sch Med, Seoul, South Korea
[5] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Dept Med Device Management & Res, SAIHST, Seoul, South Korea
[6] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Dept Digital Hlth, SAIHST, Seoul, South Korea
[7] Kyung Hee Univ, Grad Sch, Dept Med, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; MATHEMATICAL-MODELS; GLEASON SCORE; B-VALUES; MRI; DIFFERENTIATION; REPEATABILITY; DIAGNOSIS; MEN;
D O I
10.1259/bjr.20190757
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the usefulness of histogram analysis of stretched exponential model (SEM) on diffusion-weighted imaging in evaluating clinically significant prostate cancer (CSC). Methods: A total of 85 patients with prostate cancer underwent 3T multiparametric MRI, followed by radical prostatectomy. Histogram parameters of the tumor from the SEM [distributed diffusion coefficient (DDC) and alpha] and the monoexponential model [MEM; apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC)] were evaluated, The associations between parameters and Gleason score or Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System v. 2 were evaluated. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve was calculated to evaluate diagnostic performance of parameters in predicting CSC. Results: The values of histogram parameters of DDC and ADC were significantly lower in patients with CSC than in patients without CSC (p < 0.05), except for skewness and kurtosis. The value of the 25th percentile of alpha was significantly lower in patients with CSC than in patients without CSC (p = claw. Histogram parameters of ADC and DDC had significant weak to moderate negative associations with Gleason score or Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System v. 2 (p < 0.001), except for skewness and kurtosis. For predicting CSC, the area under the curves of mean ADC (0.856), 50th percentile DDC (0.852), and 25th percentile alpha (0.707) yielded the highest values compared to other histogram parameters from each group. Conclusion: Histogram analysis of the SEM on diffusion-weighted imaging may be a useful quantitative tool for evaluating CSC, However, the SEM did not outperform the MEM. Advances in knowledge: Histogram parameters of SEM may be useful for evaluating CSC.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Diffusion-weighted imaging of prostate cancer using a statistical model based on the gamma distribution
    Shinmoto, Hiroshi
    Oshio, Koichi
    Tamura, Chiharu
    Soga, Shigeyoshi
    Okamura, Teppei
    Yamada, Kentaro
    Kaji, Tastumi
    Mulkern, Robert V.
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2015, 42 (01) : 56 - 62
  • [32] Comparison of Monoexponential, Biexponential, Stretched-Exponential, and Kurtosis Models of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Differentiation of Renal Solid Masses
    Zhang, Jianjian
    Suo, Shiteng
    Liu, Guiqin
    Zhang, Shan
    Zhao, Zizhou
    Xu, Jianrong
    Wu, Guangyu
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2019, 20 (05) : 791 - 800
  • [33] Diffusion-Weighted MRI in the Detection of Prostate Cancer: Meta-Analysis
    Tan, Cher Heng
    Wei, Wei
    Johnson, Valen
    Kundra, Vikas
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2012, 199 (04) : 822 - 829
  • [34] Comparing mono-exponential, bi-exponential, and stretched-exponential diffusion-weighted MR imaging for stratifying non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in a rabbit model
    Li, Chang
    Ye, Jing
    Prince, Martin
    Peng, Yun
    Dou, Weiqiang
    Shang, Songan
    Wu, Jingtao
    Luo, Xianfu
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2020, 30 (11) : 6022 - 6032
  • [35] Characterization of focal liver lesions using the stretched exponential model: comparison with monoexponential and biexponential diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging
    Kim, Hyung Cheol
    Seo, Nieun
    Chung, Yong Eun
    Park, Mi-Suk
    Choi, Jin-Young
    Kim, Myeong-Jin
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2019, 29 (09) : 5111 - 5120
  • [36] MR spectroscopic imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging of prostate cancer with Gleason scores
    Nagarajan, Rajakumar
    Margolis, Daniel
    Raman, Steven
    Sarma, Manoj K.
    Sheng, Ke
    King, Christopher R.
    Verma, Gaurav
    Sayre, James
    Reiter, Robert E.
    Thomas, M. Albert
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2012, 36 (03) : 697 - 703
  • [37] Diffusion-weighted imaging with histogram analysis of the apparent diffusion coefficient maps in the diagnosis of parotid tumours
    Razek, A. A. K. Abdel
    Gadelhak, B. N.
    El Zahabey, I. A.
    Elrazzak, G. A. E. A.
    Mowafey, B.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2022, 51 (02) : 166 - 174
  • [38] Diffusion-weighted Endorectal MR Imaging at 3 T for Prostate Cancer: Tumor Detection and Assessment of Aggressiveness
    Vargas, Hebert Alberto
    Akin, Oguz
    Franiel, Tobias
    Mazaheri, Yousef
    Zheng, Junting
    Moskowitz, Chaya
    Udo, Kazuma
    Eastham, James
    Hricak, Hedvig
    RADIOLOGY, 2011, 259 (03) : 775 - 784
  • [39] Comparison Between Gleason Score and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Obtained from Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of Prostate Cancer Patients
    Caivano, Rocchina
    Rabasco, Paola
    Lotumolo, Antonella
    Cirillo, Patrizia
    D'Antuono, Felice
    Zandolino, Alexis
    Villonio, Antonio
    Macarini, Luca
    Salvatore, Marco
    Cammarota, Aldo
    CANCER INVESTIGATION, 2013, 31 (09) : 625 - 629
  • [40] Accuracy of high b-value diffusion-weighted MRI for prostate cancer detection: a meta-analysis
    Godley, Keith Craig
    Syer, Tom Joseph
    Toms, Andoni Paul
    Smith, Toby Oliver
    Johnson, Glyn
    Cameron, Donnie
    Malcolm, Paul Napier
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2018, 59 (01) : 105 - 113