Histogram analysis from stretched exponential model on diffusion-weighted imaging: evaluation of clinically significant prostate cancer

被引:8
|
作者
Kim, EunJu [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Chan Kyo [3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Kim, Hyun Soo [7 ]
Jang, Dong Pyo [1 ]
Kim, In Young [1 ]
Hwang, Jinwoo [2 ]
机构
[1] Hanyang Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Philips Healthcare, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Samsung Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Sch Med, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Samsung Med Ctr, Ctr Imaging Sci, Sch Med, Seoul, South Korea
[5] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Dept Med Device Management & Res, SAIHST, Seoul, South Korea
[6] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Dept Digital Hlth, SAIHST, Seoul, South Korea
[7] Kyung Hee Univ, Grad Sch, Dept Med, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; MATHEMATICAL-MODELS; GLEASON SCORE; B-VALUES; MRI; DIFFERENTIATION; REPEATABILITY; DIAGNOSIS; MEN;
D O I
10.1259/bjr.20190757
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the usefulness of histogram analysis of stretched exponential model (SEM) on diffusion-weighted imaging in evaluating clinically significant prostate cancer (CSC). Methods: A total of 85 patients with prostate cancer underwent 3T multiparametric MRI, followed by radical prostatectomy. Histogram parameters of the tumor from the SEM [distributed diffusion coefficient (DDC) and alpha] and the monoexponential model [MEM; apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC)] were evaluated, The associations between parameters and Gleason score or Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System v. 2 were evaluated. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve was calculated to evaluate diagnostic performance of parameters in predicting CSC. Results: The values of histogram parameters of DDC and ADC were significantly lower in patients with CSC than in patients without CSC (p < 0.05), except for skewness and kurtosis. The value of the 25th percentile of alpha was significantly lower in patients with CSC than in patients without CSC (p = claw. Histogram parameters of ADC and DDC had significant weak to moderate negative associations with Gleason score or Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System v. 2 (p < 0.001), except for skewness and kurtosis. For predicting CSC, the area under the curves of mean ADC (0.856), 50th percentile DDC (0.852), and 25th percentile alpha (0.707) yielded the highest values compared to other histogram parameters from each group. Conclusion: Histogram analysis of the SEM on diffusion-weighted imaging may be a useful quantitative tool for evaluating CSC, However, the SEM did not outperform the MEM. Advances in knowledge: Histogram parameters of SEM may be useful for evaluating CSC.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] An Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Study of Prostate Cancer
    Shinmoto, Hiroshi
    Tamura, Chiharu
    Soga, Shigeyoshi
    Shiomi, Eisuke
    Yoshihara, Nobuyuki
    Kaji, Tatsumi
    Mulkern, Robert V.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2012, 199 (04) : W496 - W500
  • [22] Usefulness of Diffusion-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer
    Wu, Lian-Ming
    Xu, Jian-Rong
    Gu, Hai-Yan
    Hua, Jia
    Chen, Jie
    Zhang, Wei
    Zhu, Jiong
    Ye, Yong-Quan
    Hu, Jiani
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2012, 19 (10) : 1215 - 1224
  • [23] Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Evaluation of Prostate Cancer: Optimal B Value at 3T
    Koo, Ii Hyun
    Kim, Chan Kyo
    Choi, Dongil
    Park, Byung Kwan
    Kwon, Ghee Young
    Kim, Bohyun
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2013, 14 (01) : 61 - 69
  • [24] Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in lymph node staging for prostate cancer
    Caglic, Iztok
    Barrett, Tristan
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2018, 7 (05) : 814 - 823
  • [25] Stretched-exponential model diffusion-weighted imaging as a potential imaging marker in preoperative grading and assessment of proliferative activity of gliomas
    Chen, Xiaowei
    Jiang, Jingjing
    Shen, Nanxi
    Zhao, Lingyun
    Zhang, Jiaxuan
    Qin, Yuanyuan
    Zhang, Shun
    Li, Li
    Zhu, Wenzhen
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH, 2018, 10 (08): : 2659 - 2668
  • [26] Histogram analysis in prostate cancer: a comparison of diffusion kurtosis imaging model versus monoexponential model
    Jiang, Yuwei
    Li, Chunmei
    Liu, Ying
    Shi, Kaining
    Zhang, Wei
    Liu, Ming
    Chen, Min
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2020, 61 (10) : 1431 - 1440
  • [27] Differentiation of Prostate Cancer and Stromal Hyperplasia in the Transition Zone With Monoexponential, Stretched-Exponential Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging in a Reduced Number of b Values: Correlation With Whole-Mount Pathology
    Zhou, Bingni
    Liu, Xiaohang
    Gan, Hualei
    Gao, Hongbo
    Zhang, Yong
    Zhou, Liangping
    Gu, Yajia
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2022, 46 (04) : 545 - 550
  • [28] The value of diffusion-weighted imaging in the detection of prostate cancer: a meta-analysis
    Chen Jie
    Liu Rongbo
    Tan Ping
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2014, 24 (08) : 1929 - 1941
  • [29] Prostate Cancer Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Does the Choice of Diffusion-Weighting Level Matter?
    Maier, Stephan E.
    Wallstrom, Jonas
    Langkilde, Fredrik
    Johansson, Jens
    Kuczera, Stefan
    Hugosson, Jonas
    Hellstrom, Mikael
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2022, 55 (03) : 842 - 853
  • [30] Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in patients with prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy
    Iannelli, Giancarlo
    Caivano, Rocchina
    Rago, Luciana
    Simeon, Vittorio
    Lotumolo, Antonella
    Rabasco, Paola
    Villonio, Antonio
    Gioioso, Matilde
    Mastrangelo, Pietro
    Barchetti, Flavio
    Panebianco, Valeria
    Macarini, Luca
    Guglielmi, Giuseppe
    Cammarota, Aldo
    TUMORI JOURNAL, 2016, 102 (01): : 71 - 76