The development of the concept of return-on-investment from large-scale quality improvement programmes in healthcare: an integrative systematic literature review (vol 22, 1492, 2022)

被引:1
作者
Thusini, S'thembile [1 ]
Milenova, Maria [1 ]
Nahabedian, Noushig [2 ]
Grey, Barbara [2 ]
Soukup, Tayana [1 ]
Chua, Kia-Chong [1 ]
Henderson, Claire [1 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll London, London, England
[2] South London & Maudsley NHS Fdn Trust, London, England
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会; 英国惠康基金;
关键词
Benefit; Mental health; Quality Improvement; ROI; Value;
D O I
10.1186/s12913-022-08978-0
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Return on Investment (ROI) is increasingly being used to evaluate financial benefits from healthcare Quality Improvement (QI). ROI is traditionally used to evaluate investment performance in the commercial field. Little is known about ROI in healthcare. The aim of this systematic review was to analyse and develop ROI as a concept and develop a ROI conceptual framework for large-scale healthcare QI programmes. Methods: We searched Medline, Embase, Global health, PsycInfo, EconLit, NHS EED, Web of Science, Google Scholar using ROI or returns-on-investment concepts (e.g., cost–benefit, cost-effectiveness, value). We combined this terms with healthcare and QI. Included articles discussed at least three organisational QI benefits, including financial or patient benefits. We synthesised the different ways in which ROI or return-on-investment concepts were used and discussed by the QI literature; first the economically focused, then the non-economically focused QI literature. We then integrated these literatures to summarise their combined views. Results: We retrieved 10 428 articles. One hundred and two (102) articles were selected for full text screening. Of these 34 were excluded and 68 included. The included articles were QI economic, effectiveness, process, and impact evaluations as well as reports and conceptual literature. Fifteen of 68 articles were directly focused on QI programme economic outcomes. Of these, only four focused on ROI. ROI related concepts in this group included cost-effectiveness, cost–benefit, ROI, cost-saving, cost-reduction, and cost-avoidance. The remaining articles mainly mentioned efficiency, productivity, value, or benefits. Financial outcomes were not the main goal of QI programmes. We found that the ROI concept in healthcare QI aligned with the concepts of value and benefit, both monetary and non-monetary. Conclusion: Our analysis of the reviewed literature indicates that ROI in QI is conceptualised as value or benefit as demonstrated through a combination of significant outcomes for one or more stakeholders in healthcare organisations. As such, organisations at different developmental stages can deduce benefits that are relevant and legitimate as per their contextual needs. Trial registration: Review registration: PROSPERO; CRD42021236948. © 2022, The Author(s).
引用
收藏
页数:1
相关论文
empty
未找到相关数据