The development of the concept of return-on-investment from large-scale quality improvement programmes in healthcare: an integrative systematic literature review

被引:8
|
作者
Thusini, S. 'thembile [1 ]
Milenova, Maria [1 ]
Nahabedian, Noushig [2 ]
Grey, Barbara [2 ]
Soukup, Tayana [1 ]
Chua, Kia-Chong [1 ]
Henderson, Claire [1 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll London, London, England
[2] South London & Maudsley NHS Fdn Trust, London, England
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
ROI; Quality Improvement; Value; Benefit; Mental health; WARD RELEASING TIME; INSTITUTIONAL LOGICS; ECONOMIC-EVALUATION; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; PUBLIC-VALUE; 6; SIGMA; MANAGEMENT; STANDARDS; PRODUCTIVITY; CHALLENGES;
D O I
10.1186/s12913-022-08832-3
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Return on Investment (ROI) is increasingly being used to evaluate financial benefits from healthcare Quality Improvement (QI). ROI is traditionally used to evaluate investment performance in the commercial field. Little is known about ROI in healthcare. The aim of this systematic review was to analyse and develop ROI as a concept and develop a ROI conceptual framework for large-scale healthcare QI programmes. Methods: We searched Medline, Embase, Global health, PsycInfo, EconLit, NHS EED, Web of Science, Google Scholar using ROI or returns-on-investment concepts (e.g., cost-benefit, cost-effectiveness, value). We combined this terms with healthcare and QI. Included articles discussed at least three organisational QI benefits, including financial or patient benefits. We synthesised the different ways in which ROI or return-on-investment concepts were used and discussed by the QI literature; first the economically focused, then the non-economically focused QI literature. We then integrated these literatures to summarise their combined views. Results: We retrieved 10 428 articles. One hundred and two (102) articles were selected for full text screening. Of these 34 were excluded and 68 included. The included articles were QI economic, effectiveness, process, and impact evaluations as well as reports and conceptual literature. Fifteen of 68 articles were directly focused on QI programme economic outcomes. Of these, only four focused on ROI. ROI related concepts in this group included cost-effectiveness, cost-benefit, ROI, cost-saving, cost-reduction, and cost-avoidance. The remaining articles mainly mentioned efficiency, productivity, value, or benefits. Financial outcomes were not the main goal of QI programmes. We found that the ROI concept in healthcare QI aligned with the concepts of value and benefit, both monetary and non-monetary. Conclusion: Our analysis of the reviewed literature indicates that ROI in QI is conceptualised as value or benefit as demonstrated through a combination of significant outcomes for one or more stakeholders in healthcare organisations. As such, organisations at different developmental stages can deduce benefits that are relevant and legitimate as per their contextual needs.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] The development of the concept of return-on-investment from large-scale quality improvement programmes in healthcare: an integrative systematic literature review
    S’thembile Thusini
    Maria Milenova
    Noushig Nahabedian
    Barbara Grey
    Tayana Soukup
    Kia-Chong Chua
    Claire Henderson
    BMC Health Services Research, 22
  • [2] Identifying and understanding benefits associated with return-on-investment from large-scale healthcare Quality Improvement programmes: an integrative systematic literature review
    Thusini, S'thembile
    Milenova, Maria
    Nahabedian, Noushig
    Grey, Barbara
    Soukup, Tayana
    Henderson, Claire
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [3] Identifying and understanding benefits associated with return-on-investment from large-scale healthcare Quality Improvement programmes: an integrative systematic literature review
    S’thembile Thusini
    Maria Milenova
    Noushig Nahabedian
    Barbara Grey
    Tayana Soukup
    Claire Henderson
    BMC Health Services Research, 22
  • [4] How is return on investment from quality improvement programmes conceptualised by mental healthcare leaders and why: a qualitative study
    Thusini, S'thembile
    Soukup, Tayana
    Chua, Kia-Chong
    Henderson, Claire
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [5] What influences perceptions about the concept of return on investment from healthcare quality improvement programmes? An institutional theory perspective
    Thusini, S'thembile
    Soukup, Tayana
    Henderson, Claire
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH GOVERNANCE, 2024, 29 (03) : 213 - 228
  • [6] How is return on investment from quality improvement programmes conceptualised by mental healthcare leaders and why: a qualitative study
    S’thembile Thusini
    Tayana Soukup
    Kia-Chong Chua
    Claire Henderson
    BMC Health Services Research, 23
  • [7] The contribution of benchmarking to quality improvement in healthcare. A systematic literature review
    Willmington, Claire
    Belardi, Paolo
    Murante, Anna Maria
    Vainieri, Milena
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [8] Quality Requirements in Large-Scale Distributed Agile Projects - A Systematic Literature Review
    Alsaqaf, Wasim
    Daneva, Maya
    Wieringa, Roel
    REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING: FOUNDATION FOR SOFTWARE QUALITY, REFSQ 2017, 2017, 10153 : 219 - 234
  • [9] Comparing Methods for Large-Scale Agile Software Development: A Systematic Literature Review
    Edison, Henry
    Wang, Xiaofeng
    Conboy, Kieran
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 2022, 48 (08) : 2709 - 2731
  • [10] The contribution of benchmarking to quality improvement in healthcare. A systematic literature review
    Claire Willmington
    Paolo Belardi
    Anna Maria Murante
    Milena Vainieri
    BMC Health Services Research, 22