Monitoring strategies for local landslide early warning systems

被引:177
作者
Pecoraro, Gaetano [1 ]
Calvello, Michele [1 ]
Piciullo, Luca [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Salerno, Dept Civil Engn, Fisciano, Italy
[2] Univ Milano Bicocca, Dept Earth & Environm Sci, Milan, Italy
[3] Norwegian Geotech Inst NGI, Ulleval Stad, N-0806 Oslo, Norway
关键词
LEWS; Landslide models; Warning models; Warning systems; Risk management; 18; MARCH; 2007; FAILURE FORECAST; RAINFALL; PREDICTION; DESIGN; RELIABILITY; PERFORMANCE; RESERVOIR; SENSORS; RUAPEHU;
D O I
10.1007/s10346-018-1068-z
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
The main aim of this study is the description and the analysis of the monitoring strategies implemented within local landslide early warning systems (Lo-LEWS) operational all around the world. Relevant information on 29 Lo-LEWS have been retrieved from peer-reviewed articles published in scientific journals and proceedings of technical conferences, books, reports, and institutional web pages. The first part of the paper describes the characteristics of these early warning systems considering their different components. The main characteristics of each system are summarized using tables with the aim of providing easily accessible information for technicians, experts, and stakeholders involved in the design and operation of Lo-LEWSs. The second part of the paper describes the monitoring networks adopted within the considered systems. Monitoring strategies are classified in terms of monitored activities and methods detailing the parameters and instruments adopted. The latter are classified as a function of the type of landslide being monitored. The discussion focuses on issues relevant for early warning, including appropriateness of the measurements, redundancy of monitoring methods, data analysis, and performance. Moreover, a description of the most used monitoring parameters and instruments for issuing warnings is presented.
引用
收藏
页码:213 / 231
页数:19
相关论文
共 81 条
[1]  
Andrea Giuliani, 2010, American Journal of Environmental Sciences, V6, P516, DOI 10.3844/ajessp.2010.516.522
[2]   Lava flow hazard prediction and monitoring with UAS: a case study from the 2014–2015 Pāhoa lava flow crisis, Hawai‘i [J].
Turner N.R. ;
Perroy R.L. ;
Hon K. .
Journal of Applied Volcanology, 6 (1)
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Nat. Hazards Rev., DOI DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2000)1:2(119)
[4]  
[Anonymous], LANDSLIDE HAZARD RIS
[5]   On the use of seismic detectors as monitoring and warning systems for debris flows [J].
Arattano, M .
NATURAL HAZARDS, 1999, 20 (2-3) :197-213
[6]   Systems and sensors for debris-flow monitoring and warning [J].
Arattano, Massimo ;
Marchi, Lorenzo .
SENSORS, 2008, 8 (04) :2436-2452
[7]   A debris-flow alarm system for the Alpine Illgraben catchment: design and performance [J].
Badoux, Alexandre ;
Graf, Christoph ;
Rhyner, Jakob ;
Kuntner, Richard ;
McArdell, Brian W. .
NATURAL HAZARDS, 2009, 49 (03) :517-539
[8]   Application and reliability of techniques for landslide site investigation, monitoring and early warning - outcomes from a questionnaire study [J].
Baron, I. ;
Supper, R. .
NATURAL HAZARDS AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2013, 13 (12) :3157-3168
[9]  
Blikra L.H., 2013, Italian Journal of Engineering Geology and Environment, V6, P307, DOI DOI 10.4408/IJEGE2013.06.B-28
[10]  
Broccolato M, 2010, CONFERENCE PRESENTAT