Minimal-access colorectal surgery is associated with fewer adhesion-related admissions than open surgery

被引:37
作者
Kennelly, R. P. [1 ]
Rogers, A. C. [1 ]
Winter, D. C. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] St Vincents Univ Hosp, Ctr Colorectal Dis, Dublin 4, Ireland
[2] St Vincents Univ Hosp, Univ Coll Dublin, Sch Med, Dublin 4, Ireland
关键词
LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; INCISIONAL HERNIA; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; COLON-CANCER; INTESTINAL-OBSTRUCTION; OPEN COLECTOMY; TERM OUTCOMES; CLASICC TRIAL; FOLLOW-UP; RESECTION;
D O I
10.1002/bjs.9001
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: This study aimed to describe national intermediate-term admission rates for incisional hernia or clinically apparent adhesions following colorectal surgery, and to compare rates following laparoscopic and open approaches. Methods: Patients undergoing primary colorectal resection between 2002 and 2008 were included from the Hospital Episode Statistics database. Subsequent inpatient admissions were extracted for up to 3 years after the initial operation or to the end of the study period. Outcomes examined were admissions with a diagnosis of, or operative interventions for, incisional hernia or adhesions. Results: A total of 187 148 patients were included between 2002 and 2008, with median follow-up of 31.8 (interquartile range 13.135.3) months. Some 8885 (4.7 per cent) of these patients were admitted with a diagnosis of, or underwent a repair of, an incisional hernia. In multiple regression analysis, use of laparoscopy was not a predictor of operative intervention for incisional hernia (odds ratio 1.09, 95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) 0.99 to 1.21; P = 0.083). Some 15 125 (8.1 per cent) of the patients were admitted with a diagnosis of adhesions or had a procedure for division of adhesions. Overall, 3.5 per cent (6637 of 187 148) of patients underwent adhesiolysis. Patients selected for a laparoscopic procedure had lower rates of admission for adhesions (6.3 per cent (692 of 11 013) for laparoscopic versus 8.2 per cent (14 433 of 176 135) for open surgery; P < 0.001) and reintervention for adhesions (2.8 per cent (305 of 11 013) versus 3.6 per cent (6325 of 176 135) respectively; P < 0.001) than those undergoing an open procedure. In multiple regression analysis, patients selected for a laparoscopic procedure had lower subsequent intervention rates for adhesions (odds ratio 0.80, 95 per cent c.i. 0.71 to 0.90; P < 0.001). Discussion: Patients undergoing colorectal resection who are selected for the laparoscopic approach have a lower risk of developing clinically significant adhesions. Copyright (c) 2012 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:160 / 166
页数:7
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Incisional hernia after open versus laparoscopic sigmoid resection [J].
Andersen, Lars Peter Holst ;
Klein, Mads ;
Gogenur, Ismail ;
Rosenberg, Jacob .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2008, 22 (09) :2026-2029
[2]   Impact of adhesions in colorectal surgery [J].
Bhardwaj, R. ;
Parker, M. C. .
COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2007, 9 :45-53
[3]  
Bonjer HJ, 2009, LANCET ONCOL, V10, P44, DOI 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70310-3
[4]   Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer:: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial [J].
Bonjer, HJ ;
Haglind, E ;
Jeekel, I ;
Kazemier, G ;
Páhlman, L ;
Hop, WCJ ;
Veldkamp, R ;
Kuhry, E ;
Haglind, E ;
Pahlman, L ;
Cuesta, MA ;
Msika, S ;
Morino, M ;
Lacy, A ;
Jeekel, I .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2005, 6 (07) :477-484
[5]   Laparoscopic vs. open colectomy in cancer patients:: Long-term complications, quality of life, and survival [J].
Braga, M ;
Frasson, M ;
Vignali, A ;
Zuliani, W ;
Civelli, V ;
Di Carlo, V .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2005, 48 (12) :2217-2223
[6]   Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery - A randomized trial on short-term outcome [J].
Braga, M ;
Vignali, A ;
Gianotti, L ;
Zuliani, W ;
Radaelli, G ;
Gruarin, P ;
Dellabona, P ;
Di Carlo, V .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2002, 236 (06) :759-766
[7]  
Burger JWA, 2004, ANN SURG, V240, P578
[8]   Variation in reoperation after colorectal surgery in England as an indicator of surgical performance: retrospective analysis of Hospital Episode Statistics [J].
Burns, Elaine M. ;
Bottle, Alex ;
Aylin, Paul ;
Darzi, Ara ;
Nicholls, R. John ;
Faiz, Omar .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 343
[9]   DEPRIVATION - EXPLAINING DIFFERENCES IN MORTALITY BETWEEN SCOTLAND AND ENGLAND AND WALES [J].
CARSTAIRS, V ;
MORRIS, R .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1989, 299 (6704) :886-889
[10]   A NEW METHOD OF CLASSIFYING PROGNOSTIC CO-MORBIDITY IN LONGITUDINAL-STUDIES - DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION [J].
CHARLSON, ME ;
POMPEI, P ;
ALES, KL ;
MACKENZIE, CR .
JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1987, 40 (05) :373-383