Perioperative Outcomes of Single vs Multi-Port Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Single Institutional Experience

被引:46
|
作者
Saidian, Ava [1 ]
Fang, Andrew M. [1 ]
Hakim, Ornin [2 ]
Magi-Galluzzi, Cristina [3 ]
Nix, Jeffrey W. [1 ,4 ]
Rais-Bahrami, Soroush [1 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Sch Med, Dept Urol, Birmingham, AL USA
[2] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Sch Med, Birmingham, AL USA
[3] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Pathol, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[4] UAB, ONeal Comprehens Canc Ctr, Birmingham, AL USA
[5] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Radiol, Birmingham, AL USA
关键词
prostatic neoplasms; prostatectomy; robotic surgical procedures; minimally invasive surgical procedures;
D O I
10.1097/JU.0000000000000811
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Surgical approach to radical prostatectomy has evolved due to advances in minimally invasive surgery, with most contemporary approaches involving the Si or Xi multi-port robotic systems. U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval of the single-port da Vinci (R) SP robotic platform has led to a few case series suggesting its safety and feasibility for robotic assisted radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer. However, there are no established data on perioperative outcomes comparing single-port to multi-port robotic approaches to robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Materials and Methods: All patients who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy by 2 urological surgeons at our institution between October 2018 and June 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. The available preoperative clinical and demographic data, operative parameters and postoperative outcomes were collected and analyzed using the t-test, chi-square and Fisher exact statistical measures. Results: Overall 95 patients who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy at our institution were included in our study, with 47 single-port and 48 multi-port. Preoperative clinical parameters including age, body mass index, prior abdominal surgery and biopsy grade group were similar across the 2 groups. No differences in estimated blood loss (169.2 +/- 114.2 vs 157.7 +/- 125.4 ml, p=0.64), operative time (255.9 +/- 44.1 vs 274.7 +/- 50.4 minutes, p=0.06), length of hospitalization (1.1 +/- 0.5 vs 1.4 +/- 1.1 days, p=0.17), rate of perioperative inpatient Clavien-Dindo complications 2 or greater (4.3% vs 6.3% p=0.66) and rate of positive pathological margin (21.3% vs 27.1%, p=0.51) were noted comparing the single-port and multi-port approaches, respectively. Conclusions: The single-port robotic system allows a feasible approach to robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and has operative and perioperative outcomes comparable to those of the well accepted multi-port robotic approach.
引用
收藏
页码:490 / 495
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy with the Senhance® robotic platform: single center experience
    Raimundas Venckus
    Marius Jasenas
    Titas Telksnys
    Martynas Venckus
    Vinsas Janusonis
    Audrius Dulskas
    Narimantas E. Samalavicius
    World Journal of Urology, 2021, 39 : 4305 - 4310
  • [12] Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy with the Senhance® robotic platform: single center experience
    Venckus, Raimundas
    Jasenas, Marius
    Telksnys, Titas
    Venckus, Martynas
    Janusonis, Vinsas
    Dulskas, Audrius
    Samalavicius, Narimantas E.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 39 (12) : 4305 - 4310
  • [13] Single Port Transvesical Robot Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Ramos, Roxana
    Soputro, Nicolas
    Pedraza, Adriana M.
    Chavali, Jaya S.
    Mikesell, Carter
    Kaouk, Jihad
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2025, 39 : S39 - S46
  • [14] A direct comparison of robotic assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A single institution experience
    Rozet, Francois
    Jaffe, Jamison
    Braud, Guillaume
    Harmon, Justin
    Cathelineau, Xavier
    Barret, Eric
    Vallancien, Guy
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 178 (02) : 478 - 482
  • [15] Salvage Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: A Single Institution, 5-Year Experience
    Kaffenberger, Samuel D.
    Keegan, Kirk A.
    Bansal, Neil K.
    Morgan, Todd M.
    Tang, Dominic H.
    Barocas, Daniel A.
    Penson, David F.
    Davis, Rodney
    Clark, Peter E.
    Chang, Sam S.
    Cookson, Michael S.
    Herrell, S. Duke
    Smith, Joseph A., Jr.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 189 (02) : 507 - 513
  • [16] Effect of Prior Focal Therapy on Perioperative, Oncologic and Functional Outcomes of Salvage Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Nunes-Silva, Igor
    Barret, Eric
    Srougi, Victor
    Baghdadi, Mohammed
    Capogrosso, Paolo
    Garcia-Barreras, Silvia
    Kanso, Solange
    Tourinho-Barbosa, Rafael
    Carneiro, Arie
    Sanchez-Salas, Rafael
    Rozet, Francois
    Galiano, Marc
    Cathelineau, Xavier
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 198 (05) : 1069 - 1075
  • [17] Impact of prior abdominal surgery on the outcomes after robotic - assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: single center experience
    Kishimoto, Nozomu
    Takao, Tetsuya
    Yamamichi, Gaku
    Okusa, Takuya
    Taniguchi, Ayumu
    Tsutahara, Koichi
    Tanigawa, Go
    Yamaguchi, Seiji
    INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL, 2016, 42 (05): : 918 - 924
  • [18] Single-port robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with the da Vinci SP system: A single surgeon's experience
    Kim, Kwang Hyun
    Song, Wan
    Yoon, Hana
    Lee, Dong Hyeon
    INVESTIGATIVE AND CLINICAL UROLOGY, 2020, 61 (02) : 173 - 179
  • [19] Initial Experience with Single-Port Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy: Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes Between Single-Port and Conventional Multiport Approaches
    Gross, James T.
    Vetter, Joel M.
    Sands, Kenneth G.
    Palka, Joshua K.
    Bhayani, Sam B.
    Figenshau, Robert S.
    Kim, Eric H.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2021, 35 (08) : 1177 - 1183
  • [20] Open vs. robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: A single surgeon and pathologist comparison of pathologic and oncologic outcomes
    Masterson, Timothy A.
    Cheng, Liang
    Boris, Ronald S.
    Koch, Michael O.
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2013, 31 (07) : 1043 - 1048