Perioperative Outcomes of Single vs Multi-Port Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Single Institutional Experience

被引:0
|
作者
Thompson, James E. [1 ]
Stricker, Phillip D.
机构
[1] St Vincents Clin, Dept Urol, Sydney, NSW, Australia
来源
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY | 2020年 / 204卷 / 03期
关键词
minimally invasive surgical procedures; prostatectomy; prostatic neoplasms; robotic surgical procedures;
D O I
10.1097/JU.0000000000000811.01
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose:Surgical approach to radical prostatectomy has evolved due to advances in minimally invasive surgery, with most contemporary approaches involving the Si or Xi multi-port robotic systems. U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval of the single-port da Vinci® SP robotic platform has led to a few case series suggesting its safety and feasibility for robotic assisted radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer. However, there are no established data on perioperative outcomes comparing single-port to multi-port robotic approaches to robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.Materials and Methods:All patients who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy by 2 urological surgeons at our institution between October 2018 and June 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. The available preoperative clinical and demographic data, operative parameters and postoperative outcomes were collected and analyzed using the t-test, chi-square and Fisher exact statistical measures.Results:Overall 95 patients who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy at our institution were included in our study, with 47 single-port and 48 multi-port. Preoperative clinical parameters including age, body mass index, prior abdominal surgery and biopsy grade group were similar across the 2 groups. No differences in estimated blood loss (169.2±114.2 vs 157.7±125.4 ml, p=0.64), operative time (255.9±44.1 vs 274.7±50.4 minutes, p=0.06), length of hospitalization (1.1±0.5 vs 1.4±1.1 days, p=0.17), rate of perioperative inpatient Clavien-Dindo complications 2 or greater (4.3% vs 6.3% p=0.66) and rate of positive pathological margin (21.3% vs 27.1%, p=0.51) were noted comparing the single-port and multi-port approaches, respectively.Conclusions:The single-port robotic system allows a feasible approach to robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and has operative and perioperative outcomes comparable to those of the well accepted multi-port robotic approach. © 2020 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:495 / 495
页数:1
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes Between Single-Port and Multi-Port Robotic Adrenalectomy
    Fang, Andrew M.
    Fazendin, Jessica M.
    Rais-Bahrami, Soroush
    Porterfield, John R.
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2023, 89 (05) : 1668 - 1672
  • [12] ONCOLOGIC OUTCOMES OF SINGLE-PORT TRANSVESICAL AND MULTI-PORT TRANSPERITONEAL ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Nicolas, Soputro A.
    Tarik, Benidir
    Ethan, Ferguson L.
    Zaeem, Lone
    Roxana, Ramos-Carpinteyro
    Christopher, Weight J.
    Jihad, Kaouk H.
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2024, 42 : S17 - S17
  • [13] Re: A Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes between Single-Port and Multi-Port Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy
    Cadeddu, Jeffrey A.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 205 (02): : 610 - 611
  • [14] Comparison of outcomes between single-port and multi-port robotic radical nephrectomy
    Okhawere, Kennedy E.
    Razdan, Shirin
    Bamby, Jewel
    Saini, Indu
    Zuluaga, Laura
    Sauer, Ruben Calvo
    Soputro, Nicolas
    Eun, Daniel D.
    Bhandari, Akshay
    Hemal, Ashok K.
    Porter, James
    Abaza, Ronney
    Mansour, Ahmed
    Ahmed, Mutahar
    Crivellaro, Simone
    Pierorazio, Phillip M.
    Singla, Nirmish
    Kaouk, Jihad
    Stifelman, Michael D.
    Badani, Ketan K.
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2024, 18 (01)
  • [15] Single port robotic radical prostatectomy versus multi-port robotic radical prostatectomy: A human factor analysis during the initial learning curve
    Talamini, Susan
    Halgrimson, Whitney R.
    Dobbs, Ryan W.
    Morana, Carmelo
    Crivellaro, Simone
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2021, 17 (02):
  • [16] Comment on: “perioperative results of single-port vs multi-port robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy via peritoneal approach: a meta-analysis” by Lv, et al
    Jian-wei Yang
    Li Kunpeng-Li
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2023, 17 : 3049 - 3050
  • [17] A PROPENSITY MATCHED COMPARISON OF THE PERIOPERATIVE OUTCOMES BETWEEN SINGLE-PORT AND MULTI-PORT ROBOTIC ASSISTED PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY
    Okhawere, Kennedy E.
    Beksac, Alp Tuna
    Wilson, Michael
    Korn, Talia G.
    Meilika, Kirolos N.
    Harrison, Robert
    Morgantini, Luca
    Ahmed, Mutahar
    Mehrazin, Reza
    Abaza, Ronney
    Eun, Daniel D.
    Bhandari, Akshay
    Hemal, Ashok K.
    Porter, James
    Stifelman, Michael D.
    Kaouk, Jihad
    Crivellaro, Simone
    Badani, Ketan K.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 207 (05): : E398 - E399
  • [18] Comment on: "perioperative results of single-port vs multi-port robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy via peritoneal approach: a meta-analysis" by Lv, et al
    Yang, Jian-wei
    Yang, Li
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2023, 17 (06) : 3049 - 3050
  • [19] SINGLE-PORT EXTRAPERITONEAL VS TRANSPERITONEAL ROBOTIC-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: A MULTI-INSTITUTIONAL MATCHED-PAIR COMPARISON OF OUTCOMES
    Abou Zeinab, Mahmoud
    Ferguson, Ethan
    Kaviani, Aaron
    Beksac, Alp T.
    Moschovas, Marcio
    Morgantini, Luca
    Hemal, Sij
    Talamini, Susan
    Joseph, Jean
    Kim, Moses
    Crivellaro, Simone
    Patel, Vipul
    Nix, Jeffrey
    Kaouk, Jihad
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 207 (05): : E918 - E919
  • [20] Incidence of Incisional Hernias after Single-Port Versus Multi-Port Robotic Radical Prostatectomy
    Norton, J. Corbin
    Compher, Tyler
    Shumaker, Luke
    Burns, Zachary
    Nix, Jeffrey W.
    Parmar, Abhishek D.
    Rais-Bahrami, Soroush
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2025, 39 (01) : 2 - 9