Perioperative Outcomes of Single vs Multi-Port Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Single Institutional Experience

被引:46
|
作者
Saidian, Ava [1 ]
Fang, Andrew M. [1 ]
Hakim, Ornin [2 ]
Magi-Galluzzi, Cristina [3 ]
Nix, Jeffrey W. [1 ,4 ]
Rais-Bahrami, Soroush [1 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Sch Med, Dept Urol, Birmingham, AL USA
[2] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Sch Med, Birmingham, AL USA
[3] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Pathol, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[4] UAB, ONeal Comprehens Canc Ctr, Birmingham, AL USA
[5] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Radiol, Birmingham, AL USA
关键词
prostatic neoplasms; prostatectomy; robotic surgical procedures; minimally invasive surgical procedures;
D O I
10.1097/JU.0000000000000811
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Surgical approach to radical prostatectomy has evolved due to advances in minimally invasive surgery, with most contemporary approaches involving the Si or Xi multi-port robotic systems. U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval of the single-port da Vinci (R) SP robotic platform has led to a few case series suggesting its safety and feasibility for robotic assisted radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer. However, there are no established data on perioperative outcomes comparing single-port to multi-port robotic approaches to robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Materials and Methods: All patients who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy by 2 urological surgeons at our institution between October 2018 and June 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. The available preoperative clinical and demographic data, operative parameters and postoperative outcomes were collected and analyzed using the t-test, chi-square and Fisher exact statistical measures. Results: Overall 95 patients who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy at our institution were included in our study, with 47 single-port and 48 multi-port. Preoperative clinical parameters including age, body mass index, prior abdominal surgery and biopsy grade group were similar across the 2 groups. No differences in estimated blood loss (169.2 +/- 114.2 vs 157.7 +/- 125.4 ml, p=0.64), operative time (255.9 +/- 44.1 vs 274.7 +/- 50.4 minutes, p=0.06), length of hospitalization (1.1 +/- 0.5 vs 1.4 +/- 1.1 days, p=0.17), rate of perioperative inpatient Clavien-Dindo complications 2 or greater (4.3% vs 6.3% p=0.66) and rate of positive pathological margin (21.3% vs 27.1%, p=0.51) were noted comparing the single-port and multi-port approaches, respectively. Conclusions: The single-port robotic system allows a feasible approach to robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and has operative and perioperative outcomes comparable to those of the well accepted multi-port robotic approach.
引用
收藏
页码:490 / 495
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Extraperitoneal versus Transperitoneal Single Port Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: A Comparative Analysis of Perioperative Outcomes
    Chen, I-Hsuan Alan
    Sooriakumaran, Prasanna
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 203 (06) : 1140 - 1140
  • [2] Single port robotic radical prostatectomy versus multi-port robotic radical prostatectomy: A human factor analysis during the initial learning curve
    Talamini, Susan
    Halgrimson, Whitney R.
    Dobbs, Ryan W.
    Morana, Carmelo
    Crivellaro, Simone
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2021, 17 (02)
  • [3] Minimally invasive cytoreductive radical prostatectomy, exploring the safety and feasibility of a single-port or multi-port robotic platform
    Daniel J. Lama
    Kyle Thomas
    Simone L. Vernez
    Oluwatimilehin Okunowo
    Clayton S. Lau
    Bertram E. Yuh
    BMC Urology, 24
  • [4] Minimally invasive cytoreductive radical prostatectomy, exploring the safety and feasibility of a single-port or multi-port robotic platform
    Lama, Daniel J.
    Thomas, Kyle
    Vernez, Simone L.
    Okunowo, Oluwatimilehin
    Lau, Clayton S.
    Yuh, Bertram E.
    BMC UROLOGY, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [5] Patient surgical satisfaction after da Vinci® single-port and multi-port robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: propensity score-matched analysis
    Jonathan Noël
    Marcio Covas Moschovas
    Marco Sandri
    Seetharam Bhat
    Travis Rogers
    Sunil Reddy
    Cathy Corder
    Vipul Patel
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2022, 16 : 473 - 481
  • [6] Single-port versus multi-port: will “one for all” ever become a new standard for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy?
    Riccardo Bertolo
    Chiara Cipriani
    Juan Garisto
    Pierluigi Bove
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2021, 15 : 143 - 145
  • [7] One-Year Clinical Experience of Single-Port and Multi-Port Robotic Thyroid Surgery in a Single Institution
    Lee, Sun Min
    Hwang, Hilal
    Shin, Myung Ho
    Yi, Jin Wook
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (18)
  • [8] Single-port versus multi-port: will "one for all" ever become a new standard for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy?
    Bertolo, Riccardo
    Cipriani, Chiara
    Garisto, Juan
    Bove, Pierluigi
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2021, 15 (01) : 143 - 145
  • [9] Patient surgical satisfaction after da Vinci(R) single-port and multi-port robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: propensity score-matched analysis
    Noel, Jonathan
    Moschovas, Marcio Covas
    Sandri, Marco
    Bhat, Seetharam
    Rogers, Travis
    Reddy, Sunil
    Corder, Cathy
    Patel, Vipul
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2022, 16 (02) : 473 - 481
  • [10] Single port robotic radical prostatectomy: a systematic review
    Lai, Andrew
    Dobbs, Ryan W.
    Talamini, Susan
    Halgrimson, Whitney R.
    Wilson, Jessica O.
    Vigneswaran, Hari T.
    Crivellaro, Simone
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2020, 9 (02) : 898 - 905