Response to Open Peer Commentaries on "A Broader Understanding of Moral Distress"

被引：0

作者：

Campbell, Stephen M. ^{[1
]}

Ulrich, Connie M. ^{[2
]}

Grady, Christine ^{[3
]}

机构：

[1] Bentley Univ, Waltham, MA USA

[2] Univ Penn, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA

[3] NIH, Bldg 10, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA

来源：

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS | 2016年 / 16卷 / 12期

关键词：

decision making; medicine; moral theory; professional ethics; professional-patient relationship;

D O I：

10.1080/15265161.2016.1248579

中图分类号：

B82 [伦理学（道德学）];

学科分类号：

摘要：

On the traditional view, moral distress arises only in cases where an individual believes she knows the morally right thing to do but fails to perform that action due to various constraints. We seek to motivate a broader understanding of moral distress. We begin by presenting six types of distress that fall outside the bounds of the traditional definition and explaining why they should be recognized as forms of moral distress. We then propose and defend a new and more expansive definition of moral distress and examine how it can enable the development of a taxonomy of moral distress.

引用

页码：W1 / W3

页数：3

共 14 条

[1] Understanding Moral Distress Through the Lens of Social Reflective Equilibrium [J].