Is letrozole superior to clomiphene for ovarian stimulation prior to intrauterine insemination?

被引:0
作者
Khanna, Shalini C. C. [1 ]
Kumar, Ashok [1 ]
Joy, Susan G. G. [1 ]
Tanwar, Renu [1 ]
Sharma, Shashi [2 ]
Prasad, Sudha [1 ]
机构
[1] Maulana Azad Med Coll, IVF & Reprod Biol Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, New Delhi 110002, India
[2] Inst Cytol & Prevent Oncol, Sect 39, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India
关键词
Clomiphene citrate; Letrozole; Ovulation induction; Intrauterine insemination; ENDOMETRIAL THICKNESS; AROMATASE INHIBITORS; OVULATION INDUCTION; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; INFERTILE WOMEN; PREGNANCY RATE; CITRATE; EFFICACY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy of letrozole with clomiphene citrate for ovarian stimulation prior to intrauterine insemination.MethodsA total of 272 patients underwent 362 cycles of stimulation prior to IUI from January 2009 to May 2011. One hundred and twenty-six patients (170 cycles) received letrozole 5 mg and 146 patients (192 cycles) received clomiphene citrate 100 mg for 5 days starting on day 3 of the cycle. Intrauterine insemination was done 36 +/- 4 h after hCG injection in 99 patients (131 cycles) in the letrozole group and 115 patients (136 cycles) in the clomiphene group. The number of mature follicles and serum E2 levels was monitored on the day of hCG. Endometrial thickness was noted on the day of hCG and IUI as well. The pregnancy rate, the miscarriage rate, and other parameters were evaluated only for patients who underwent IUI.ResultsThe mean number of mature follicles was significantly more in the clomiphene group (1.66 +/- 1.69 vs. 1.41 +/- 1.53) than in the letrozole group. No significant difference in endometrial thickness on the day of hCG administration was found; however, endometrial thickness was statistically significantly higher in the clomiphene group on the day of IUI (9.28 +/- 1.43 vs. 8.77 +/- 1.34). Serum E-2 levels on the day of hCG were statistically significantly higher in the clomiphene group (501.09 +/- 2.45 vs. 214.79 +/- 2.43 pg/ml). Pregnancy rate was 9.2 %/cycle and 12.12 %/patient in the letrozole group, and 8.1 %/cycle and 9.5 %/cycle in the clomiphene group; these differences were not statistically significant.ConclusionThis study found no superiority of letrozole over clomiphene when used for ovarian stimulation and IUI.
引用
收藏
页码:571 / 575
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [42] Recombinant FSH versus clomiphene citrate for ovarian stimulation in couples with unexplained infertility and male subfertility undergoing intrauterine insemination: a randomized trial
    Berker, Bulent
    Kahraman, Korhan
    Taskin, Salih
    Sukur, Yavuz Emre
    Sonmezer, Murat
    Atabekoglu, Cem Somer
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2011, 284 (06) : 1561 - 1566
  • [43] Ovarian reserve markers in unexplained infertility patients treated with clomiphene citrate during intrauterine insemination
    Oner, Gokalp
    Ulug, Pasa
    Elmali, Ferhan
    ARCHIVES OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2015, 11 (06) : 1250 - 1254
  • [44] Prospective randomized trial comparing efficacy of letrozole step-up protocol with letrozole plus gonadotropins for controlled ovarian stimulation and intrauterine insemination in patients with unexplained infertility
    Kaur, Japleen
    Suri, Vanita
    Gainder, Shalini
    Arora, Aashima
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2019, 300 (06) : 1767 - 1771
  • [45] A triple-blind, randomized, controlled trial, comparing combined letrozole and clomiphene versus only letrozole for ovulation induction in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome
    Panda, Soumya Ranjan
    Sharmila, Vijayan
    Kalidoss, Vinoth Kumar
    Hota, Smrutismita
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2023, 161 (01) : 63 - 70
  • [46] The SUPER study: protocol for a randomised controlled trial comparing follicle-stimulating hormone and clomiphene citrate for ovarian stimulation in intrauterine insemination
    Danhof, N. A.
    van Wely, M.
    Koks, C. A. M.
    Gianotten, J.
    de Bruin, J. P.
    Cohlen, B. J.
    van der Ham, D. P.
    Klijn, N. F.
    van Hooff, M. H. A.
    Broekmans, F. J. M.
    Fleischer, K.
    Janssen, C. A. H.
    van Weert, J. M. Rijn
    van Disseldorp, J.
    Twisk, M.
    Traas, M.
    Verberg, M. F. G.
    Pelinck, M. J.
    Visser, J.
    Perquin, D. A. M.
    Boks, D. E. S.
    Verhoeve, H. R.
    van Heteren, C. F.
    Mol, B. W. J.
    Repping, S.
    van der Veen, F.
    Mochtar, M. H.
    BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (05):
  • [47] Recombinant FSH versus clomiphene citrate for ovarian stimulation in couples with unexplained infertility and male subfertility undergoing intrauterine insemination: a randomized trial
    Bulent Berker
    Korhan Kahraman
    Salih Taskin
    Yavuz Emre Sukur
    Murat Sonmezer
    Cem Somer Atabekoglu
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2011, 284 : 1561 - 1566
  • [48] Controlled ovarian stimulation and intrauterine insemination: an actual therapy?
    Martins Almeida, Joana Palmira
    Pinelo, Sueli
    Serra, Helena
    Barbosa, Antonio
    Felgueira, Eduarda
    Pires, Ilda
    Tavares, Angelina
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE GINECOLOGIA E OBSTETRICIA, 2011, 33 (11): : 341 - 347
  • [49] Use of letrozole versus clomiphene citrate combined with gonadotropins in patients with clomiphene resistant polycystic ovarian syndrome: A comparative study
    Foroozanfard, Fatemeh
    Mahdian, Mehrdad
    Mousavi, Gholamabbas
    Pejmanmanesh, Mansoureh
    Soleimani, Alireza
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2011, 27 (05) : 967 - 970
  • [50] Gonadotrophin ovarian stimulation and intrauterine insemination for unexplained infertility
    Balasch, J
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2004, 9 (06) : 664 - 672